PROFILE: Zelensky Approves 40 Days of Strikes — A Commander Who Chooses the Offensive

PROFILE: Zelensky Approves 40 Days of Strikes — A Commander Who Chooses the Offensive

Introduction: The President-in-Chief Who Chooses Attack

A 40-day decision that changes the dynamics

On June 25, 2026, President Volodymyr Zelensky approved a 40-day influence operations campaign conducted by the SBU (Security Service of Ukraine) against Russia, aimed at compelling Moscow to end the war. This is not a simple tactical decision — it is a strategic choice that defines Ukraine's posture in the complex diplomatic context of summer 2026: negotiate from strength, not from weakness.

The campaign targets oil refineries, military installations, and logistical infrastructure deep inside Russian strategic territory. Zelensky confirmed having recently struck two refineries in Ufa — 1,500 km from the front lines — and an oil depot in Krasnodar. These strikes, confirmed by geolocated images and reports from NewsUkraine RBC, illustrate a long-range strike capability that was unthinkable even two years ago.

The SBU as the armed arm of the offensive strategy

The SBU — Security Service of Ukraine — is not merely a counterintelligence agency. Under the leadership of Vasyl Maliuk, it has become one of the key actors in Ukrainian offensive operations, combining intelligence, sabotage, and deep drone strikes. The 40-day campaign represents the institutional formalization of this offensive capability — medium-term planning rather than a series of opportunistic actions.

For Zelensky, publicly approving this campaign is also a diplomatic message. As Witkoff and Kushner resume their diplomatic shuttles with Moscow, he signals that Ukraine is not prepared to passively await the outcome of negotiations. Military pressure and diplomatic pressure are not alternatives — they are complementary.

The Geography of the Strikes: 1,500 km From the Lines

Ufa and Krasnodar: hitting Russia's oil industry

The strikes on Ufa — capital of Bashkiria, 1,500 km from the Ukrainian front lines — represent one of the deepest documented Ukrainian strikes in this conflict. Ufa hosts several major oil refineries that supply not only the Russian civilian economy but also the war machine — aviation fuels, armored vehicle lubricants, missile propellants. Disrupting these capabilities is not a symbolic gesture — it is a direct blow to Russian military logistics.

Krasnodar, in southern Russia, is also a key logistical hub for supplies toward the Ukrainian front, notably via Crimea and the southern Donbas. Repeated strikes on its oil depots disrupt fuel flows to combat zones, directly affecting Russia's capacity to maintain operational tempo at the front.

Ukrainian drones: a military revolution underway

Ukraine's capacity to strike at 1,500 km rests on a drone industry built at impressive speed since 2022. The FP-5 Flamingo cruise missiles, FP-1 drones, AN-196 Liutyi platforms, and the new Bars turbofan drone-missile form an arsenal that has radically changed the nature of the conflict. Ukraine has invested massively in this industrial sector, with partial support from its allies for components and technology transfers.

According to The Guardian of June 26, 2026, June 2026 became the record month for Ukrainian long-range strikes against Russia, with at least 13 strikes on Russian defense industrial facilities in the month alone. Ukrainian drone swarms saturate Russian air defenses, which cannot intercept all projectiles simultaneously.

Zelensky's Strategy: Strike to Negotiate

The logic of offensive pressure

Zelensky's decision to approve the 40-day campaign precisely when peace negotiations are resuming is not a paradox — it is a coherent strategy. In any negotiation, the position of the party that abandons military pressure to "facilitate discussions" is weakened. Zelensky has clearly drawn the lesson from the spring 2022 experience, when Ukrainian restraint on bombing was not rewarded by Russian concessions during the Istanbul talks.

By maintaining and intensifying military pressure — including during periods of negotiations — Zelensky signals that Ukraine does not need a ceasefire to survive, that its offensive capabilities are growing, and that the cost of the war for Russia will continue to rise regardless of diplomatic outcomes. It is this logic that led Trump himself to acknowledge being "impressed" by the Ukrainian strikes.

Public approval as a diplomatic message

The public nature of the approval of the 40-day campaign is significant. Zelensky could have approved this operation without announcing it publicly — operational secrecy sometimes offers tactical advantage. The fact that he makes it a public announcement confirms that it is as much a diplomatic message as a military decision. He signals to Moscow, to Washington, to allies, and to his own population that Ukraine is on the offensive, determined, and not ready to make unilateral concessions.

The Portrait of a Man at War: Zelensky Since 2022

From actor to commander in chief

Volodymyr Zelensky was born in 1978 in Kryvyi Rih, an industrial city in central Ukraine. His career as an actor and television producer culminated in the role of a teacher who accidentally becomes president in the series "Servant of the People." Life sometimes has a remarkable sense of irony: in 2019, he was actually elected President of Ukraine. In 2022, he had to become that character — the leader who refuses to flee in the face of an invasion.

The phrase — "I don't need a ride, I need ammunition" — spoken on the night of February 24, 2022 when he was offered evacuation, crystallized something. This was not rhetoric — it was an existential choice. And that choice transformed not only the war but the man himself. The Zelensky of June 2026 is harder, more strategic, more experienced in the inner workings of international diplomacy than the man who refused evacuation four years earlier.

The invisible scars and assumed vulnerability

Leading a country at war for more than four years leaves marks. Zelensky has lost friends and colleagues to Russian bombs. He lives under permanent protection, sleeping only a few hours a night according to some accounts. He simultaneously negotiates with Trump, Macron, Scholz, Modi, and dozens of other leaders, while managing military operations, humanitarian supplies, and economic pressure on his country.

Despite all this, in his public appearances, Zelensky maintains a presence and energy that commands respect. There is in this resistance something that goes beyond politics and strategy — something more deeply human, touching on the question of what one does in the face of existential adversity. It is this quality that earns him admiration well beyond the circles of security analysts.

The 40 Days as an Operational Test

Priority targets according to open sources

The targets of the 40-day campaign reflect a coherent operational doctrine: striking the capabilities that directly fuel the Russian war machine. Oil refineries and fuel depots deprive Russian armor and aviation of combustible. Ammunition and weapons factories reduce the artillery shell supplies that feed Russian artillery — still Moscow's preferred weapon. Railway and road logistical nodes disrupt troop rotations and materiel resupply.

The ISW (Institute for the Study of War) documented, in its campaign assessments of June 26, 27, and 28, 2026, that Ukrainian strikes caused measurable disruptions in Russian logistics. Repairs to struck facilities take time and resources — resources that the Russian war economy, already under pressure, struggles to mobilize rapidly.

The resistance of Russian air defenses

Russia has adapted its air defenses to Ukrainian drone attacks, with notable improvements in detection and interception. It declared having shot down 992 drones and 4 Flamingo missiles in 24 hours on June 18th. These figures, likely inflated for propaganda purposes, nevertheless indicate an air defense that has gained experience. But Ukraine adapts too — by saturating defenses with simultaneous waves, varying altitudes and trajectories, using decoys that exhaust interceptor missiles.

The Psychological and Economic Impact on Russia

Fires visible 15 km from the Kremlin

The image of a refinery in flames 15 km from the Kremlin — the fires at the Gazprom Neft refinery in Kapotnya on June 18, 2026 — had an undeniable psychological impact on Moscow's population. The war, which the Putin government had presented as a distant conflict in the Donbas, is now visible from the windows of Moscow apartments. This reality undermines the official Russian narrative and creates domestic pressure that the Kremlin cannot completely ignore.

On the economic level, repeated strikes on Russian refineries have measurable effects. Reduced refining capacity translates into localized fuel shortages in certain regions, rising pump prices, and supply difficulties for industry. These effects are modulated by supply reorganization — Russia can import refined fuels from other countries — but they carry a real cost.

The morale of Russian troops facing pressure

Deep strikes also have an effect on the morale of Russian troops at the front. Knowing that their country is being struck 1,500 km from the front line, that weapons factories are burning, that oil refineries are on fire — this narrative, circulating despite censorship via Telegram channels and informal networks — erodes the conviction that Russia is "winning" a war at an acceptable cost.

Allies Watch Closely

Washington impressed, Moscow worried

According to Semafor of June 23, 2026, the pro-Ukrainian tone of recent American statements has "worried Moscow." This concern is partly the result of the Ukrainian strikes' impact on American perception of the conflict. Defense Secretary Hegseth acknowledged that the United States had "learned a great deal" from Ukrainian drone operations. Sources close to the White House, cited by Le Monde, confirm that the strikes have "humanized" the conflict for Trump.

This evolution in American perception is an indirect diplomatic success of the Ukrainian strike campaign. By demonstrating its offensive capability, Ukraine has convinced its primary financial backer of its viability as a partner and its determination to fight. This is precisely what Zelensky sought to prove.

European allies and support for long-range strikes

The G7 in Évian confirmed that allies commit to providing Ukraine with licenses to manufacture interceptor missiles and long-range weapons systems on its territory. This decision strengthens Ukrainian industrial capacity to maintain and accelerate the strike campaign. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz confirmed that licenses would also cover the production of deep strike capabilities — a strong signal of support for Ukraine's offensive strategy.

Synthesis: The Long-Term Stakes of This Decision

The lasting institutional impact

Beyond the immediate documented effects, the long-term reach of this decision deserves particular attention. The legal precedents established in June 2026 will structure political debates and legal battles for years to come. Every future administration — from whatever political direction — will now have this legally validated framework at its disposal. Rolling it back will be difficult, not only politically but also legally.

Civic institutions, rights defense organizations, and progressive political forces will need to integrate this new reality into their strategy. Challenging these policies in court will become increasingly difficult. The battleground shifts toward Congress, toward the states, and toward public opinion — arenas where persuasion and citizen mobilization still matter.

The erosion of norms as a cumulative process

What makes this episode particularly significant is that it is part of a series of decisions that, taken together, sketch a deep transformation of American norms. No single decision represents a radical and visible break. But the accumulation of these decisions — on TPS, metering, denaturalization, accelerated deportation policies — constitutes a structural transformation that long-term observers cannot ignore.

The erosion of norms is always a cumulative process. It happens gradually, incrementally, in a saturated media environment that makes it difficult to maintain focus on underlying trends. This is precisely the kind of analysis this columnist strives to provide — resisting the pressure of the daily news cycle to maintain the long-term perspective.

Conclusion: The Commander Who Refuses the Defensive

40 days to change the dynamics

The 40-day campaign approved by Zelensky on June 25, 2026 is not a guarantee of victory. Wars are not won in 40 days, especially not wars like this one, with its intertwined human, economic, diplomatic, and military dimensions. But it represents something important: a head of state who refuses to be locked into the logic of passive defense, who maintains pressure on his adversary even during peace talks, who bets on his country's offensive capability rather than on the goodwill of negotiators.

It is this offensive bet that has transformed the arc of the conflict in 2026. That has impressed Trump. That has worried Moscow. And that has convinced allies that Ukraine deserves their continued support.

The portrait of a man who chose his side

Zelensky is a man who made a choice in 2022 and has not deviated from it since. That choice — stay, resist, fight — has defined his presidency, his country, and a portion of contemporary history. The portrait history will retain of him depends greatly on the outcome of the conflict. But even with that outcome uncertain, his determination in June 2026 — to strike at 1,500 km, to approve 40 days of offensive operations, to negotiate from strength — is that of a man who has fully embraced his role in history.

By Maxime Marquette, columnist

Columnist's transparency note

My declared pro-Ukrainian commitment

I am deeply pro-Ukrainian — this bias informs every aspect of this profile. I believe that Ukraine is defending not only its sovereignty but values that matter to the entire international democratic community. This profile of Zelensky is written with admiration, which can introduce blind spots that I must acknowledge. I strive to balance this admiration with factual rigor — everything mentioned in this article is based on documented facts.

What I don't know

I have no direct knowledge of Zelensky's personality, his private deliberations, or his personal life during wartime. This profile is based entirely on his public statements, documented decisions, and secondary journalistic sources. It is partial in the etymological sense — it chooses to highlight certain aspects of his personality at the expense of others.

Sources

Primary sources

NewsUkraine RBC — Zelensky approves a 40-day influence operation — June 25, 2026

The Guardian — Zelensky and the 40-day campaign against Russia — June 26, 2026

Meduza — Zelensky announces the SBU influence operation — June 25, 2026

Secondary sources

ISW — Russian offensive campaign assessment — June 26, 2026

ISW — Russian offensive campaign assessment — June 28, 2026

The Independent — Zelensky, Putin, and the war in Ukraine — June 2026