Skip to content
The ColumnNote· No. 3407

More Than 100 Russian Banks Now Under Western Sanctions

The accumulation of successive sanctions packages adopted by the European Union since 2022 has now pushed the number of Russian banks targeted

Premium reading
MadMax
Key takeaways
  1. The accumulation of successive sanctions packages adopted by the European Union since 2022 has now pushed the number of Russian banks targeted
  2. Introduction: a symbolic threshold crossed quietly
  3. A hundred financial institutions, a number that carries weight
Transparency

Facts, quotes, and cited links remain in the body. Interpretations are framed as analysis or opinion according to the format.

Introduction: a symbolic threshold crossed quietly

A hundred financial institutions, a number that carries weight

The accumulation of successive sanctions packages adopted by the European Union since 2022 has now pushed the number of Russian banks targeted by Western restrictions past one hundred, according to information relayed by United24 Media on July 6, 2026. This threshold, reached as the 21st sanctions package is being prepared, represents more than half of all Russian financial institutions connected to international markets.

This round number is not just a bookkeeping symbol: it reflects a methodical, cumulative severing of the Russian banking system from Western financial networks, a process built patiently, package after package, since the invasion of Ukraine began. What started as a handful of targeted measures against a few state-owned giants has, four years later, become a systemic architecture of exclusion touching more than half of the institutions Moscow once relied on to trade with the outside world.

The new package adds nearly 90 banks

The 21st package, currently under negotiation, would add nearly 90 additional banks to the existing list, a major escalation also accompanied by new restrictions targeting cryptocurrencies, drone production and certain oil traders. Negotiators in Brussels describe this package as one of the most technically complex yet, since it must also account for the workarounds Russian institutions have already built into earlier rounds of sanctions.

A hundred banks is more than a symbolic figure: it means the entire architecture of the Russian financial system is being drained dry, one blocked transaction at a time. We too often underestimate the real scope of this quiet banking war.

The backdrop of an alarming intelligence report

A banking crisis described as explosive

This sanctions escalation comes as an intelligence report from a European state, revealed by Reuters on July 6, 2026, warns that Russia risks a banking crisis described as "explosive," a financial system that, according to the document, masks growing structural vulnerability behind a facade of apparent stability.

The report notes, in particular, that roughly 10% of Russian corporate loans are now considered troubled, while more than 500,000 Russians filed for personal bankruptcy in 2025, a roughly one-third increase from the year before. Analysts who reviewed the document say these figures point to a slow-burning erosion of household and corporate solvency that the Kremlin has so far managed largely through statistical framing rather than structural reform.

A fragility the Russian central bank downplays

The deputy governor of the Russian central bank, Filipp Gabunia, rejected this alarming diagnosis, insisting that banks' capital buffer remains at its highest level in three years, a reassuring narrative that stands in sharp contrast to the findings of the European intelligence report.

I find this contrast between Russia's official narrative and Western intelligence reports telling. One of the two is lying, or at least exaggerating, and recent history with Russian economic crises makes me trust data from the ground far more than the Kremlin's talking points.

Enforcement that has historically proven hard to guarantee

The absence of a single central authority in Europe

Despite this striking figure of more than a hundred sanctioned banks, Europe has often struggled to enforce its sanctions uniformly across its 27 member states, lacking a single central authority able to guarantee consistent application across every national jurisdiction.

This administrative fragmentation creates gaps that certain financial actors, Russian or third-party, exploit to keep processing transactions involving theoretically sanctioned banks, a reality that tempers the immediate effectiveness of this symbolic hundred-institution milestone. Compliance officers at several European banks have privately acknowledged that monitoring capacity varies wildly from one member state to another, leaving determined intermediaries room to maneuver.

A challenge Brussels is trying to fix

In light of this, several European officials are pushing to strengthen control and coordination mechanisms among national financial authorities, in order to close these structural gaps that limit the real impact of the banking sanctions already adopted.

I will remain skeptical until I see genuinely uniform enforcement of these sanctions across all twenty-seven European capitals. The headline ambition only matters as much as its concrete implementation on the banking front.

The cumulative effect on Russia's war economy

Institutions cut off from international markets

Sanctioned banks lose access to international payment systems dominated by Western currencies, a constraint that considerably complicates Russian commercial transactions with foreign partners, even with countries not aligned with Western sanctions such as China and India.

This gradual exclusion is forcing Moscow to develop alternative payment systems, often less efficient and more costly, an added burden for an economy already strained by four years of war against Ukraine. Russian exporters increasingly report delays of several weeks in settling payments with partners abroad, a friction cost that eats directly into margins already squeezed by wartime spending.

VTB, a warning sign from the banking sector itself

VTB, Russia's second-largest bank, plans to increase its financial reserves to guard against potential loan losses, a defensive move that betrays very real unease within Russia's own banking sector, despite the reassuring narrative from official monetary authorities.

Watching an institution as central as VTB quietly brace for the worst often says more than any official statement. Russian bankers themselves don't seem fully convinced by the Kremlin's narrative of resilience.

The American counterpoint complicating coordination

Washington eased certain restrictions

While Europe tightens its banking arsenal, the United States, under President Donald Trump, eased certain economic sanctions, notably a temporary waiver that allowed the sale of Russian oil before it expired in mid-June 2026, a divergence that complicates the overall coherence of Western pressure.

This transatlantic asymmetry potentially hands the Kremlin occasional financial breathing room, precisely as Brussels tries to tighten the vice further on the Russian banking system.

Consistency praised on the military front

It must nonetheless be acknowledged that the Trump administration continues to support arms deliveries to Ukraine, an essential distinction between its sometimes lenient economic policy toward Moscow and its firmer stance on military support for Kyiv.

I refuse the easy caricature on this issue: Trump is neither an unconditional ally of Putin nor a flawless defender of Ukraine. On the economy, I criticize him firmly. On weapons delivered to Kyiv, I honestly credit him with a consistency that deserves to be acknowledged.

China and Asia, a lasting safety net

A market largely ignoring Western sanctions

Several economic analysts point out that Asia continues largely to ignore Western sanctions, with China remaining a major trade and financial partner for sanctioned Russian banks, a safety net that partially offsets the impact of European measures.

As long as these Asian trade channels stay open, the effect of the hundred sanctioned banks will necessarily remain partial, even if every additional institution added to the list further narrows the Kremlin's financial room to maneuver in Western markets.

Growing dependency on Beijing

This deepening dependency on China is gradually turning Russia into the junior partner of an economic axis dominated by Beijing, an asymmetric relationship whose geopolitical consequences reach far beyond the current banking file alone.

I say it often: China, far more than Western sanctions themselves, will determine Russia's real long-term economic resilience. It is a relationship of dependency whose strategic price Moscow does not yet seem to fully grasp.

What this means for Ukraine's war effort

Pressure that must stay constant

For Ukraine and its Western allies, crossing the symbolic threshold of a hundred sanctioned banks is an encouraging signal, but one that should not lead to any letup in vigilance, as long as the Russian financial system retains workarounds via Asia and the oil shadow fleet.

Ukrainian officials regularly point out that every financial institution cut off from Western markets represents an added constraint on the Kremlin's ability to fund its military operations against Ukraine.

A quiet economic victory still to be consolidated

This buildup of banking sanctions, while less dramatic than a military victory on the ground, could eventually weigh significantly on the Kremlin's strategic calculations about continuing its aggression against Ukraine.

A war economy collapsing from within would be the quietest and most decisive victory of this conflict. It may well be in bank balance sheets, rather than on the battlefield, that part of this war's outcome will be decided.

The role of Western insurers and regulators

Insurers, an often-overlooked link in deterrence

Beyond banks alone, Western insurers play a key role in the real effectiveness of these sanctions, since most of the world's major maritime and financial insurance companies remain based in Europe and the United Kingdom, giving them considerable deterrent power over transactions involving sanctioned Russian banks.

Strengthening coordination between financial regulators and insurers could close some of the current gaps in the system, notably by imposing stricter compliance requirements on any transaction passing, even indirectly, through a theoretically sanctioned Russian institution.

Transatlantic cooperation still a work in progress

Transatlantic cooperation on this file remains a work in progress, with differing approaches between Washington and Brussels sometimes complicating the consistent implementation of these financial control mechanisms worldwide, a gap Russian intermediaries have exploited with methodical consistency since the conflict began.

I think the West will eventually need to go after insurers who turn a blind eye to certain dubious transactions as well. It is often there, in the financial paperwork rather than in political announcements, that real long-term deterrence plays out.

Conclusion: a symbolic threshold, not a victory won

A hundred banks, a milestone, not an endpoint

Crossing the threshold of a hundred sanctioned Russian banks marks a significant milestone in the economic war the West is waging against the Kremlin, but it in no way represents a victory already won as long as substantial workarounds remain open via Asia and parallel maritime networks.

Consistency remains the key to success

Only sustained economic pressure, combined with strengthened transatlantic coordination and continued military support for Ukraine, will turn this symbolic milestone into a genuine diplomatic lever capable of weighing on the Kremlin's decisions.

I close with deliberate caution: I firmly believe in the cumulative power of these banking sanctions, but I refuse to give in to easy euphoria over a round number. A hundred sanctioned banks alone do not guarantee the end of this war.

By Maxime Marquette, columnist

Columnist's transparency note

Who I am and my acknowledged biases

I sign this opinion piece as an engaged columnist, in favor of maximum economic pressure on Russia for as long as its aggression against Ukraine continues. I regard banking sanctions, despite their documented flaws, as a legitimate and necessary tool.

What I don't know, and my method

I do not claim to know the exact scale of the real impact of these sanctions on undeclared Russian financial flows. This analysis relies exclusively on verifiable sources and public reports, without invention or speculation presented as certainty.

Sources

Primary sources

Ukrainian Ministry of Defense — official statements, July 2026

United24 Media — New EU sanctions set to cut off over half of Russia's international banks, July 6, 2026

Army Inform — coverage of the economic war, July 2026

Secondary sources

Reuters — War threatens Russian banking crisis, European intelligence report says, July 6, 2026

Foreign Policy — economic and geopolitical analysis, 2026

The Guardian International — coverage of European sanctions, 2026

Get the geopolitics analyses

Conflicts, powers, alliances: the MadMax thread without the noise.

Cite this article

Maxime Marquette (2026). More Than 100 Russian Banks Now Under Western Sanctions. MadMax. https://mad-max.co/en/article/plus-de-100-banques-russes-desormais-sous-sanctions-occidentales

How does this piece make you feel?
MM
Maxime Marquette
Independent columnist

Maxime Marquette writes most of the analyses and columns published on MadMax — geopolitics, technology, and current events, no filler.

The Newsletter

Enjoyed this piece? Get the next one.

One chronicle a week, straight to your inbox. No noise.

Comments

0 / 2000

Be the first to weigh in.

This article was generated with AI assistance, under human supervision.

Note4 reads1881 words8 min read