# Shanghai Bets 100 Million Yuan on the Quantum Race Against the West

> In early July 2026, Shanghai opened a zone dedicated to incubating the future industry of quantum computing in the Xuhui district, with

- Author: Maxime Marquette
- Publisher: MadMax (https://mad-max.co)
- Section: Reportage
- Published: 2026-07-06
- Canonical URL: https://mad-max.co/en/article/shanghai-mise-100-millions-de-yuans-sur-le-pari-quantique-face-a-l-occident

## Introduction: a city speeding up the quantum race

### A quiet launch loaded with meaning

In early July 2026, Shanghai opened a zone dedicated to incubating the future **industry** of **quantum** computing in the Xuhui district, with **funding** reaching up to **100 million** yuan, roughly **14.73 million** US dollars, earmarked for basic **research**. **Companies** that manage to bring a first product to market can receive up to an additional **20 million** yuan. This move, technical on its face, fits into a much broader national **strategy** that Beijing now openly acknowledges.

Twenty-six founding **companies** are already part of this incubation zone, according to reporting from **The Quantum Insider**. That figure, still modest, conceals a clear ambition: turning **Shanghai** into an unavoidable global hub for **quantum** computing, at a moment when **Western** governments sometimes struggle to coordinate their own efforts across federal agencies, universities, and private venture **capital**.

### Quantum, China's new national priority

This announcement did not come out of nowhere. China's **15th five-year plan**, covering 2026-2030, explicitly names **quantum** computing as a national **strategic** priority. A week before the Xuhui zone opened, **Shanghai** had also launched the **Zhangjiang Quantum Bay** in the Pudong district, bringing the total number of **quantum** players counted in the Shanghai metropolitan area alone to more than **60 companies**.

The **competition** is therefore not playing out only between countries: it is also playing out between **Chinese** cities, each trying to become the country's national nerve center for the sector. This internal rivalry, typical of the **Chinese** model of industrial development, acts as a formidable accelerator for the entire ecosystem.

*I will say it upfront: we need to stop underestimating this race. Every time the West shrugs off a seemingly technical Chinese announcement, it loses a little more ground in an arena that will determine military and economic power for the next decade.*

## Jiuzhang 4.0: China's technological showcase

### A photonic computer with staggering performance

The most striking symbol of this ambition remains **Jiuzhang 4.0**, a **photonic** **quantum** **computer** capable of manipulating up to **3,050 photons** at once. According to published data, the machine completes a Gaussian boson sampling calculation in roughly **25 microseconds**, a task Chinese researchers claim would take a classical supercomputer like **El Capitan**, currently one of the most powerful in the world, an astronomically long time.

**Chinese** scientists cite a speed-up factor somewhere between **10 to the power of 42 and 10 to the power of 54** compared with the best existing classical machine for this specific task. Those figures, staggering on paper, deserve some nuance: this is performance on one specific mathematical problem, not a universal **quantum** **computer** capable of replacing classical architectures across every use case.

### The limits of a spectacular feat

This is a crucial point Chinese messaging tends to downplay: Jiuzhang 4.0 is not a versatile tool. It excels at one narrow mathematical task, boson sampling, which has no immediate direct industrial application. The achievement's significance remains more symbolic and **scientific** than operational in the short term.

That does not diminish the value of the demonstration: it proves China's mastery of extremely high-precision **photonic** engineering, expertise that could eventually feed into other applications, from **cryptography** to advanced materials simulation.

*We should be honest enough to admit it: this technical feat is real, even if it does not immediately shift the global industrial balance. But the history of disruptive technologies shows that symbolic advantage often precedes operational advantage by just a few years.*

## The American and Western response

### American leadership still real, but fragile

According to a **report** cited by **ForkLog**, the **United States** still holds a **slight lead** over **China** in the global **quantum** race, largely thanks to the quality of its university labs and the maturity of its technology venture **capital** ecosystem. That lead, however, narrows every year as **Beijing** ramps up massive, coordinated public investment.

**China** is estimated to have invested somewhere between **15 and 16 billion** dollars in the **quantum** sector in recent years, an amount that far exceeds comparable public **commitments** in the **United States**. **Beijing** also reportedly claims nearly **60% of global patents** filed in the field, an indicator that, if confirmed, points to a worrying trajectory for Western **innovation**.

### Washington confronting its own bureaucratic slowness

A document presented to a US House of Representatives **committee** highlights coordination problems between federal agencies on **quantum** **funding**. Unlike the Chinese model, where the central state can quickly channel targeted funds into special economic zones, the American system remains fragmented across the Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation, the Pentagon, and various state initiatives.

This fragmentation, often presented as the necessary trade-off of a democratic, decentralized system, becomes a direct competitive disadvantage when a **strategic** adversary can mobilize colossal resources without the constraints of parliamentary debate or interagency rivalry.

*It is precisely this kind of institutional slowness that worries me most. The West does not have a talent problem or a scientific intelligence problem: it has a problem of collective execution speed, and quantum is fast becoming the starkest example of that organizational lag.*

## The hidden military stakes behind the civilian showcase

### Cryptography and national security on the front line

Behind the announcements of incubators and research grants lies a far more serious stake: the future **capacity** of a sufficiently powerful quantum computer to break the encryption systems currently protecting military, diplomatic, and financial communications. This is what is known as the **"harvest now, decrypt later"** scenario, where data encrypted today could be intercepted and decrypted tomorrow, once **quantum** **technology** matures enough.

This prospect explains why Western **security** agencies, particularly American ones, are actively pushing the migration to **post-quantum cryptography** standards, designed to withstand future quantum computing **capabilities**. The visible scientific competition thus conceals an equally crucial defensive race.

### A long-term strategic battleground

According to an **analysis** published by **Asia Times**, the cross-investments between Washington and Beijing in quantum now resemble a new technological arms race, in some ways comparable to the Cold War's space rivalry, but with much broader implications touching the civilian economy, **defense**, and intelligence.

Quantum computing is therefore not merely a matter for university labs: it is a question of national sovereignty that neither Washington nor Beijing can afford to lose, and Europe, often absent from this debate, **risks** becoming a spectator to a battle that will nonetheless determine its own digital future.

*I choose my words carefully: Europe must stop being a spectator in this race. Without massive, coordinated investment, the continent risks becoming dependent on technological choices made in Washington or Beijing, a strategic dependency we can no longer afford in 2026.*

## The role of Chinese private companies

### An incubation ecosystem modeled on special economic zones

The model Shanghai has adopted follows a recipe proven since the 1980s: create special economic zones offering subsidies, tax breaks, and dedicated infrastructure to quickly attract talent and capital. Applied to quantum, this model aims to turn a still largely experimental sector into a viable commercial **industry** within just a few years.

The **26 founding companies** in the Xuhui zone thus gain easier access to public **funding**, as well as geographic proximity to Shanghai's universities and **research** centers, a factor often underestimated in the success of technology clusters.

### Internal competition as an innovation engine

The coexistence of the Xuhui zone and Zhangjiang Quantum Bay illustrates a typically Chinese dynamic: encouraging competition between districts and municipalities to maximize the national collective effort. Rather than concentrating all efforts in a single hub, Beijing lets several urban centers compete for leadership, hoping this internal rivalry produces better overall results.

This approach, which may look redundant from the outside, has already proven itself in other strategic Chinese sectors, notably electric vehicles and solar panels, where the proliferation of local players eventually produced global champions capable of dominating international markets.

*We need to face reality: this Chinese method, however blunt and state-driven, has worked more than once. Denying its effectiveness out of ideological comfort would be the worst strategic mistake the West could make in the face of this new quantum challenge.*

## Expected economic ripple effects

### A market still embryonic but with strong potential

The global quantum computing **market** remains, in 2026, embryonic compared with classical technology giants. Yet analysts project exponential growth over the coming decade, driven by applications in pharmaceuticals, materials science, logistics, and financial modeling.

**Companies** that manage to patent the first viable commercial applications stand to gain a considerable competitive edge, much as pioneers of generative artificial intelligence have in recent years. Shanghai is clearly betting on this first-mover dynamic.

### The risks of a technological speculative bubble

Some Western analysts, however, warn of the **risk** of a speculative bubble forming around quantum, comparable to what artificial intelligence experienced at certain points. Spectacular raw performance announcements, like that of Jiuzhang 4.0, do not necessarily guarantee rapid commercial profitability or massive short-term industrial adoption.

This caution, legitimate on financial grounds, should not, however, serve as an excuse to slow Western public investment in basic **research**, because that is precisely the ground China is methodically conquering, subsidy after subsidy.

*I will say it plainly: financial caution must never become an excuse for strategic disengagement. One can doubt a technology's immediate profitability while still recognizing it will be decisive for tomorrow's power.*

## The battle for scientific talent

### A two-way brain drain

The quantum competition is also playing out on the field of human talent. China has significantly strengthened its universities and **research** centers to retain its best scientists, many of whom used to leave to study or work in the **United States**. At the same time, some Western researchers of Chinese origin are now choosing to return to China, drawn by generous funding and cutting-edge infrastructure.

This dynamic reverses the historical brain-drain pattern that long benefited American universities, a shift whose long-term **consequences** for Western scientific leadership remain hard to measure precisely, but which worries many academic officials in the **United States**.

### Western universities under pressure

Facing this competition, several American and European universities are calling for greater public **funding** to stay competitive, both in salaries and **research** equipment. The **risk**, flagged by several researchers, is a gradual erosion of Western scientific advantage if governments fail to keep pace with Chinese investment.

This battle for talent shows just how far the quantum competition extends beyond the purely technological realm: it touches the overall attractiveness of university systems and the **capacity** of Western democracies to retain their best scientific minds.

*Here is a subject we do not discuss enough: a nation's true wealth is its brains. If the West keeps underpaying and under-equipping its researchers, it will soon not need to worry about China, because it will have already lost the battle against itself.*

## What is at stake for Western tech companies

### Google, IBM, and America's quantum giants

In the **United States**, **companies** like **IBM** and **Google** remain global references in quantum **research**, with architectures based on superconducting qubits, a different approach from the photonic path favored by the Chinese teams behind Jiuzhang. This diversity of technical approaches shows that no scientific consensus yet exists on the best technological path toward a truly useful, large-scale quantum computer.

This technological uncertainty is itself an advantage for players able to fund several **research** paths in parallel, a **capability** that today really only the **United States** and China possess at this scale, leaving Europe in the position of a costly observer rather than a central player.

### Europe's structural lag in private investment

European venture **capital** remains, compared with its American or Chinese counterparts, notably more cautious about long-term investment in technologies whose commercial profitability remains uncertain. This financial caution, culturally embedded in the European ecosystem, slows the emergence of local champions capable of rivaling American giants or Chinese state-backed conglomerates.

Without a radical shift in this **investment** culture, Europe **risks** finding itself, within a decade, in the position of a mere consumer of quantum technologies developed elsewhere, a dependency that would carry considerable economic and security **consequences**.

*I will say this with all the frankness it deserves: Europe must break out of its chronic financial timidity. You do not build technological sovereignty with speeches about budgetary caution while strategic rivals invest tens of billions without hesitation.*

## The diplomatic dimension of the quantum race

### A new tool of technological soft power

Beyond its concrete applications, China's quantum power demonstration also serves as a diplomatic tool, meant to show the rest of the world that China is no longer just the planet's manufacturing workshop, but a first-rate scientific and technological power, capable of directly rivaling the **United States** in the most advanced fields of basic **research**.

This message is aimed as much at potential partners in the Global South, who might choose China over the West as a technology partner, as at Chinese citizens themselves, invited to see in these advances proof of the success of the development model championed by the Communist Party.

### Technology alliances as a new geopolitical stake

Facing this offensive, several Western voices are calling for strengthened technology alliances between democracies, modeled on what already exists in advanced semiconductors with American restrictions limiting Chinese access to the most sensitive technologies. Similar coordination could, according to some **experts**, slow China's progress in the quantum field.

But such coordination requires strong political will and mutual trust among Western allies, two ingredients not always guaranteed in the current geopolitical climate, marked by persistent trade **tensions** even between longstanding partners.

*This may be the most frustrating part of this story: we have the allies, we have the underlying technology, but we lack the collective political will to turn these assets into a coherent strategy against China.*

## What this means for Western national security

### A race that extends far beyond economics

It would be naive to reduce this quantum competition to a simple commercial rivalry between tech **companies**. The military implications, already noted above regarding cryptography, also extend to simulating new weapons materials, optimizing military supply chain logistics, and improving intelligence **capabilities** through massive data **analysis**.

Every Chinese quantum advance must therefore be analyzed not only from a scientific angle, but also in terms of its potential applications for strengthening the military and intelligence **capabilities** of a regime whose strategic intentions toward Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific **region** remain a legitimate source of concern for all Western democracies.

### The urgency of a coordinated response

Given this reality, several national **security** **experts** are calling for a better-coordinated Western response, combining increased public **funding**, intellectual property protection, and stronger cooperation between allied intelligence agencies. The absence of such coordination risks letting China consolidate a quantum advantage that would be difficult to close once established.

Time is short: unlike other technological fields where a gap can be closed quickly through disruptive **innovation**, quantum advances rely on **research** infrastructure that takes a long time to build, making any delay accumulated today particularly costly to make up tomorrow.

*I close this section with a personal conviction: Western national security over the next decade will be decided as much in quantum laboratories as on conventional theaters of operation. Ignoring that reality would be an unforgivable strategic negligence.*

## Coming pharmaceutical and industrial applications

### Molecular simulation, quantum's flagship promise

Among the most promising applications of quantum computing is molecular simulation, theoretically capable of dramatically accelerating the discovery of new drugs and new materials. Western and Chinese pharmaceutical **companies** are already investing in **research** partnerships with quantum labs, hoping to shave years off the usual timelines for developing new therapeutic molecules.

That promise, however, remains contingent on the arrival of quantum computers stable and powerful enough to handle complex molecular simulations, a technological threshold that neither Chinese nor Western teams have yet reliably and reproducibly reached at scale.

### The advanced materials industry lying in wait

Beyond pharmaceuticals, quantum simulation could also revolutionize the design of new materials for batteries, solar panels, or alloys used in aerospace and **defense**. China, already dominant in several critical materials supply chains, appears to be seeking to consolidate that advantage with the quantum tools developed in Shanghai and elsewhere.

For the West, also losing the advanced materials race to a China equipped with powerful quantum tools would represent a cumulative **strategic** disadvantage, adding to already-known dependencies in rare earths and semiconductors.

*This question of advanced materials strikes me as underestimated in public debate. We talk a great deal about computer chips and rare earths, but very little about the risk that China might also gain a decisive lead through quantum tools in designing tomorrow's materials.*

## Public funding compared across major powers

### Orders of magnitude that speak for themselves

Comparing public budgets allocated to quantum reveals a significant difference in method between the major powers. While China mobilizes tens of **billions** of dollars in a centralized fashion, American investments, though substantial, remain spread across multiple federal and state programs whose overall coordination remains imperfect, according to several industry analysts.

The **European Union**, for its part, has launched several joint **research** initiatives in quantum, but the amounts committed remain far below those mobilized by Washington or Beijing, an imbalance that fuels recurring criticism of Europe's lack of industrial ambition compared with the world's major technological powers.

### The role of private venture capital in the equation

In the **United States**, private venture **capital** plays a crucial complementary role, financing numerous promising quantum start-ups alongside federal public programs. This dynamic, difficult to replicate identically in China, where the state remains the central actor in **funding**, paradoxically stands as one of the main remaining American advantages in this global competition.

The American system's **capacity** to attract massive private capital, even without the same centralization as the Chinese model, could prove decisive if it manages to close the gaps in government coordination identified earlier in this piece.

*This may be the only genuine reason for optimism in this whole story: American venture capital remains a force China cannot fully replicate with its state-driven model. Washington still needs to learn to channel that force rather than let it stay scattered.*

## Reactions from the West's Asian allies

### Japan and South Korea are also accelerating

Faced with China's rise, several of the West's Asian allies, notably Japan and South Korea, have announced their own national quantum **research** programs, seeking not to fall behind in a **region** where technological rivalry with Beijing carries a particularly sensitive dimension for regional **security**.

These allied Asian initiatives could, if better coordinated with American and European efforts, form a credible technological counterweight to China's **strategy**, provided national industrial egos do not hinder cooperation that is nonetheless necessary.

### Taiwan, a key player despite itself

Taiwan, already central to global advanced semiconductor **production**, could also play a key role in manufacturing components needed for future Western quantum computers. This centrality further reinforces the island's **strategic** importance for the entire Western technological ecosystem, beyond the purely military considerations usually associated with Taiwan in geopolitical debate.

A major **crisis** over Taiwan would therefore have direct repercussions not only for classical semiconductors, but potentially also for the future supply chain of the Western quantum **industry**, an additional **risk** rarely mentioned in mainstream analyses of the subject.

*We too often forget that Taiwan is not only a military stake: it is also a quiet but essential pillar of the entire Western technology chain, quantum included. Its protection extends far beyond the usual classic strategic considerations.*

## The role of regulators and intellectual property

### Protecting innovation against the risk of industrial espionage

Protecting intellectual property is another quiet but crucial front in this quantum competition. Several Western governments have tightened their controls on foreign investment in sensitive quantum start-ups, seeking to prevent technologies funded by Western public money from ending up, through opaque buyouts or partnerships, in the hands of conglomerates linked to the Chinese state.

These control mechanisms, while useful, remain difficult to apply uniformly across allied countries, creating potential loopholes that determined actors could exploit to bypass restrictions imposed in one country by going through another, less regulated Western **market**.

### Toward a common Western doctrine on quantum

Several **experts** are calling for the development of a common Western doctrine on protecting sensitive quantum technologies, comparable to existing agreements on export controls for advanced semiconductors. Such a doctrine would require close coordination between the **United States**, the **European Union**, the United Kingdom, and key Asian allies, a complex diplomatic exercise but one increasingly seen as essential given the urgency of the situation.

Without this coordination, each Western country **risks** negotiating separately with Beijing, collectively weakening the leverage the West could otherwise build by acting in a united way against China's quantum **strategy**.

*I will say it one last time: without genuine Western coordination, every isolated technological victory will remain fragile. It is the unity of democracies, not their scattered efforts, that will determine whether the West keeps its lead over China in the coming decade.*

## Conclusion: a race that is just beginning

### A clear signal sent to the entire world

The launch of Shanghai's quantum incubation zone, modest on its face with its initial 100 **million** yuan in **funding**, should be understood as a much broader **strategic** signal: China intends to methodically build, city by city, **company** by company, a complete quantum ecosystem capable of durably rivaling the **United States**.

Jiuzhang 4.0, despite its limited immediate application, demonstrates impressive technical mastery that should not be dismissed out of comfort or excessive Western skepticism. The combination of massive public **funding**, internal competition between cities, and mobilization of scientific talent forms a recipe that has already proven itself in other Chinese industrial sectors.

### The real test will be the Western response

What remains to be seen is whether the **United States**, still slightly ahead according to some analyses, will manage to preserve that advantage against Chinese determination, and whether Europe will finally manage to move beyond its role as an observer to become a credible player in this major technological competition. The outcome of this quantum race could well determine the balance of technological and military power for decades to come.

*I close with a firm conviction: quantum is not a laboratory gadget reserved for scientists. It is a major strategic battlefield, and the West must engage with it with the same determination as China, or risk repeating tomorrow the same lag it has already experienced with semiconductors and rare earths.*

**By Maxime Marquette, columnist**

## Columnist's transparency note

### Editorial stance

I am not a journalist but a **columnist and analyst**. My expertise lies in observing and analysing the geopolitical, economic and strategic dynamics that shape our world. My work is to take political strategies apart, to understand global economic movements, to put the decisions of international actors in context and to offer analytical perspectives on the changes that are redefining our societies.

I do not claim the cold objectivity of traditional journalism, which stops at reporting facts. **I claim analytical clarity**, rigorous interpretation and a deep understanding of the complex issues that concern us all. My role is to give meaning to the facts, to place them in their historical and strategic context, and to offer a critical reading of events.

### Method and sources

This text keeps the basic distinction between **verified facts and interpretive analysis**. The rule never changes: a factual claim is published only when a verifiable source supports it, and the sources this article actually used are listed under **Sources**, never here.

**Primary source families** used by the publication, when the story has them: official statements from governments and international institutions, public statements by political leaders, reports from intergovernmental organisations, dispatches from recognised international news agencies.

**Secondary source families**: specialised publications, internationally recognised news media, analyses from established research institutions, reports from industry organisations.

When an article cites statistical, economic or geopolitical data, it comes from the institutions that produce it (intergovernmental organisations, central banks, national statistics offices), and the exact institution is named under **Sources**.

### Nature of the analysis

The analyses, interpretations and perspectives in the analytical sections of this article are a **critical, contextual synthesis** based on the information available, the trends observed and the expert comments cited in the sources consulted.

My role is to interpret these facts, to set them in the context of today's geopolitical and economic dynamics, and to give them a coherent meaning within the larger story of the changes shaping our time. These analyses reflect expertise built through continuous observation of international affairs and an understanding of the strategic mechanisms that drive global actors.

This article describes a documented state of affairs on its publication date, not a prediction: later developments may shift its outlook. No update is promised in advance; when an article is corrected or completed, the change is dated in the text.

## Sources

### Primary sources

- The Quantum Insider — Shanghai launches quantum computing hub — July 2, 2026

- Quantum Computing Report — Shanghai expands quantum foothold — July 5, 2026

- South China Morning Post — Tech — accessed July 2026

### Secondary sources

- Wikipedia — Jiuzhang (quantum computer)

- ForkLog — U.S. retains slight lead over China in quantum race — June 16, 2026

- Asia Times — US-China escalate quantum race — May 2026

- US House Committee Document — quantum funding hearing — January 22, 2026

---

Source: Maxime Marquette, MadMax. When citing, name the author and link https://mad-max.co/en/article/shanghai-mise-100-millions-de-yuans-sur-le-pari-quantique-face-a-l-occident