# The Russian army, a machine that sacrificed 1.4 million men > Introduction: the true face of Putin's army - Author: Maxime Marquette - Publisher: MadMax (https://mad-max.co) - Section: Profile - Published: 2026-07-03 - Canonical URL: https://mad-max.co/en/article/portrait-larmee-russe-une-machine-qui-a-sacrifie-14-million-dhommes ## Introduction: the true face of Putin's **army** ### A portrait drawn from numbers, not propaganda **Behind** the carefully choreographed military parades in **Moscow** lies a far darker reality: according to a **Center for Strategic and International Studies** study published on July 1, **2026**, the **Russian army** has suffered roughly 1.4 million **casualties**, including 450,000 killed, since the start of the **invasion** of **Ukraine** in February 2022. This cold, unforgiving numerical portrait reveals a military institution that has sacrificed its own men on a scale **Russia** had not seen since World War II, in a **war** that **Vladimir Putin** had presented as a mere special operation lasting a few weeks. ### An army devouring itself It is not just the **number** that **hits hardest**, but the **trajectory**: current **Russian** losses, between 30,000 and 34,000 per month according to **The New York Times**, now exceed the country's monthly recruitment capacity, estimated at about 27,000 men. An army losing more **soldiers** than it recruits is no longer an army gaining ground: it is an army methodically wearing itself down, month after month, with no sign its command intends to change **strategy**. ## The origins of a doctrine of mass sacrifice ### A Soviet legacy never abandoned Current **Russian** military doctrine draws directly on the Soviet legacy of mass **warfare**, where sheer numbers of soldiers and equipment were meant to always offset tactical and technological gaps against a better-equipped adversary. This approach, which had allowed the **Soviet Union** to defeat **Nazi Germany** at the cost of colossal losses, has proven catastrophically ill-suited against a **Ukraine** backed by Western precision technology and an innovative **drone** doctrine. ### A command that refuses to learn from its mistakes Four years after the invasion began, the **Russian** military command continues sending frontal assault waves against fortified **Ukrainian** positions, a tactic that produces massive losses for often negligible territorial gains. This persistence in error, documented by numerous **Western** military analysts, suggests either deep structural incompetence or calculated contempt for the lives of **Russian** soldiers, treated as a renewable resource rather than as individuals. ## Poor regions, the Kremlin's cannon fodder ### Recruitment that deliberately targets the most vulnerable Numerous journalistic investigations have documented since 2022 that **Russian** military recruitment disproportionately targets the country's **poorest** and most remote regions, from **Buryatia** to **Dagestan**, where enlistment bonuses represent a fortune otherwise unattainable. This unequal recruitment strategy largely spares major cities like **Moscow** and **St. Petersburg**, where the urban middle class, more inclined to challenge the government, remains largely shielded from this war's heaviest losses. ### A social injustice fueling silent resentment This geographic and social imbalance in the distribution of losses is creating growing resentment, though still largely suppressed by repression, in the peripheral regions bearing the disproportionate human weight of this **war**. This silent resentment could, over time, become a significant political fault line if the current pace of losses keeps worsening, as **CSIS** projections for **2026** and 2027 suggest. ## Mercenaries and prisoners, an army of convenience ### The desperate turn to inmates and foreigners Facing a growing shortage of volunteer recruits, the **Kremlin** has, since 2023, systematized the recruitment of **prisoners** directly from penal colonies, promising them amnesty in exchange for six months of service at the **front**, a practice that has fed a significant share of **Russian** troop numbers. More recently, converging reports point to the recruitment of foreign nationals, notably North Koreans and Central Asians, illustrating the scale of the demographic problem facing the **Russian** military apparatus. ### An army whose cohesion is fraying This heterogeneous makeup of today's **Russian** army, blending conscripts, contract soldiers, amnestied prisoners, and foreign mercenaries, poses cohesion and discipline challenges that did not exist in the more homogeneous army of the invasion's early days. Reports of desertion and insubordination, though difficult to independently verify, suggest this internal fragility could worsen if losses continue at the current pace. ## The hidden economic price behind the human losses ### Bonuses draining regional coffers Enlistment **bonuses** paid to new recruits, which have risen considerably to offset growing reluctance to enlist, now weigh heavily on **Russian** regional budgets, with several governors publicly admitting difficulty financing these incentives. This budgetary pressure, combined with the overall war effort, contributes to persistent inflation and economic strains that state propaganda increasingly struggles to hide from the **Russian** population. ### A war economy that cannot last indefinitely **Western** economists tracking the **Russian** economy agree that the current model, built on massive military spending financed by reserves and sanctioned oil revenues, is not sustainable indefinitely without painful structural reforms. This economic fragility, combined with the human hemorrhage documented by **CSIS**, paints the portrait of a country betting everything on a quick victory that, four years later, has still not materialized. ## Russian families, the silent victims of this slaughter ### A grief the regime seeks to muffle Behind every number in this study are hundreds of thousands of grieving **Russian** families, often forced to live their loss in a silence imposed by a regime that criminalizes any public criticism of the **war**, even in the form of grief expressed too openly. Makeshift cemeteries have sprung up in several **Russian** regions, filled with the graves of soldiers killed in **combat**, creating a funerary landscape that local authorities sometimes try to hide from visiting foreign delegations or independent journalists. ### Voices that are, timidly, starting to be heard Despite considerable legal risk, some mothers and wives of **Russian** soldiers have begun organizing limited protest movements, simply demanding information about their loved ones' fate or an end to repeated deployments without adequate rotation. These movements, still marginal and heavily monitored by **Russian** security services, could nonetheless signal broader social fractures to come. ## The historical comparison that should alarm the Kremlin ### Losses exceeding decades of combined **conflicts** According to data reported by **The New York Times**, cumulative **Russian** losses since 2022 now exceed four times the total American combat losses across all conflicts since World War II, a figure that gives a sense of the historic scale of this slaughter. They also exceed, according to the same study, roughly nine times the combined Soviet and **Russian** losses recorded since 1945, placing this **war** among the costliest in human life in modern **Russian** military history. ### A precedent the regime cannot afford to admit Publicly acknowledging the scale of these losses would mean, for the **Kremlin**, admitting the fundamental strategic failure of the 2022 invasion, a politically impossible admission for a regime that has built its entire legitimacy on the narrative of a necessary, winnable operation. It is this irreconcilable contradiction between the reality on the ground and the official narrative that explains the **Kremlin**'s determination to maintain a near-total blackout on its own casualty statistics. ## Consequences for Russia's future military power ### A generation of experienced fighters wiped out Beyond the raw number, the nature of these losses poses a major **structural** problem for the future of the **Russian** armed forces: many experienced **officers** and non-commissioned officers, trained before 2022, have been killed or severely wounded, depriving the army of leadership essential to passing on military expertise. This loss of skilled human capital could durably weaken the **Russian** army's operational effectiveness long after current fighting ends, a handicap that will take years, if not decades, to overcome. ### Rearmament that will take years Rebuilding a credible military force after such a human and material hemorrhage will require considerable investment and a rebuilding period that **Western** analysts estimate at at least a decade, a prospect that should, in theory, reassure **Russia**'s European neighbors. This reality reinforces the argument that sustained **Western** support for **Ukraine** today not only limits **Moscow**'s immediate territorial gains but also weakens its future capacity to threaten other European countries. ## What Beijing, Tehran, and Pyongyang are watching closely ### A lesson in caution for allied authoritarian regimes **China**, **Iran**, and **North Korea**, all linked to **Moscow** through strategic or military ties, are closely watching the scale of **Russian** losses as a warning about the real costs of a prolonged conflict against a nation backed by the **West**. For **Beijing** in particular, these figures could influence strategic calculations around a potential invasion scenario for **Taiwan**, where determined resistance, backed by Western technology, could inflict similar losses on the People's Liberation Army. ### An alliance that remains active despite the losses Despite these colossal losses, **North Korea** continues supplying munitions and, according to several reports, troops to **Russia**, while **Iran** maintains its deliveries of **Shahed** **drones**, illustrating the resilience of this authoritarian axis despite clear evidence of its catastrophic human cost. This persistence of the alliance, despite the damning figures, reveals how much these regimes view weakening the **West** as a strategic objective justifying massive human sacrifice, including that of their partners. ## Western allies facing this numerical reality ### A confirmation that should reinforce, not ease, support For Western capitals, this **CSIS** study should serve as further argument for maintaining, or even intensifying, military support for **Ukraine**, whose continued resistance keeps inflicting a major strategic cost on the **Russian** aggressor. Every additional weapons delivery, every air **defense** system supplied to **Kyiv**, directly helps sustain this loss imbalance which, over time, could force **Moscow** to reconsider the viability of its current strategy. ### The risk of a complacent reading of the numbers It would nonetheless be dangerous for the **West** to read these figures as a guarantee of imminent **Ukrainian** victory: **Russia**, despite its losses, retains a mobilization capacity and material resources allowing it to continue this **war** for a long time yet. It is precisely this capacity to endure despite enormous losses that should prompt the **West** toward strategic caution rather than premature optimism. ## The role of independent media in exposing these numbers ### Essential journalistic work against censorship The publication of this data by **The New York Times** and its analysis by **CSIS** illustrate the crucial importance of independent journalism and academic research in piercing the veil of systematic disinformation maintained by the **Russian** government over its own military losses. Without this methodical work of compilation and cross-verification, the true scale of this slaughter would remain largely invisible to the **Western** public, obscured by carefully staged official **Russian** narratives. ### A responsibility shared by all free media This investigation also underscores the responsibility of **Western** media to keep rigorously documenting this **war**, even four years in, despite the natural temptation of information fatigue toward a conflict that drags on. It is this constant journalistic vigilance that helps sustain the moral and political pressure needed to ensure support for **Ukraine** never weakens, regardless of how long the conflict lasts. ## A portrait that must remain etched in collective memory ### Beyond statistics, a lasting human tragedy This portrait of the **Russian** army, drawn through the unforgiving lens of **CSIS** figures, must be understood not as a mere accounting exercise, but as testimony to a human tragedy whose consequences will be felt in **Russia** for generations. Grieving families, regions emptied of their young men, entire villages marked by absence, constitute the silent, lasting legacy of a **war** decided by one man without any democratic consultation of his people. ### A history lesson that must never be forgotten In the decades to come, historians and researchers will revisit these figures to understand how a regime could sacrifice so many of its own citizens for an unjustifiable war of aggression, and this memory must be preserved today through rigorous journalism. It is this memory, built fact after fact, figure after figure, that will one day prevent any attempt to historically rewrite this period by a regime seeking to erase the traces of its own failure. ## Projections for the coming months of war ### A potential tipping point by the end of 2026 **CSIS** analysts project that if the current pace of **Russian** losses holds, **Moscow** could face, by the end of **2026**, a recruitment crisis severe enough to force a major strategic choice, between unpopular general mobilization and negotiating a ceasefire. Neither option is politically simple for **Vladimir Putin**, whose political survival largely depends on his ability to maintain the illusion of a **war** with no significant cost to the ordinary **Russian** population. ### A window of opportunity for Western diplomacy This potential fragility represents a window of opportunity that Western diplomacy should actively exploit, combining continued military pressure with cautious openness to negotiations that would guarantee **Ukraine**'s sovereignty and lasting security. It is this delicate balance between military firmness and diplomatic openness that could, in the coming months, turn this statistical slaughter into a genuine strategic turning point for the outcome of the **war**. ## The psychological impact on the morale of remaining Russian troops ### A weariness spreading through front-line units Accounts gathered by independent journalists from captured or deserting **Russian** soldiers describe sagging **morale** in many front-line units, facing insufficient rotation and constant losses among their comrades. This weariness, difficult to quantify precisely but broadly corroborated by several independent sources, contrasts sharply with the image of unshakable determination projected by **Russian** state propaganda. ### A command that compensates through coercion Facing this growing weariness, several reports describe increased use of internal **coercive** measures, including blocking units tasked with preventing unauthorized retreats, a practice reminiscent of the darkest methods of the Soviet army. This internal coercion, if confirmed on a large scale, would point to a far deeper morale crisis than the **Kremlin** is willing to admit publicly. ## Conclusion: a portrait that accuses more than it explains ### A regime judged by its own numbers This portrait of the **Russian** army, drawn from 1.4 million documented casualties, is not merely a military analysis: it is a silent indictment of a regime that chose a war of aggression over diplomacy, and that keeps paying its human price without ever publicly admitting it. Every number in this **CSIS** study tells an individual story of imposed sacrifice, of a broken family, of youth cut down, whose ultimate responsibility rests with one man in the **Kremlin** and those who continue to support him. ### A call to never look away Faced with such a toll, the **West**'s responsibility is not only to keep supporting **Ukraine** militarily, but also to keep alive, in public consciousness, the memory of what this **war** has truly cost, on both sides of the **front**. It is this vigilance of memory, as much as military vigilance, that will ensure such a tragedy is never trivialized or forgotten in the years following the end of the fighting. **By Maxime Marquette, columnist** ## Columnist's transparency note ### Editorial stance I am not a journalist but a **columnist and analyst**. My expertise lies in observing and analysing the geopolitical, economic and strategic dynamics that shape our world. My work is to take political strategies apart, to understand global economic movements, to put the decisions of international actors in context and to offer analytical perspectives on the changes that are redefining our societies. I do not claim the cold objectivity of traditional journalism, which stops at reporting facts. **I claim analytical clarity**, rigorous interpretation and a deep understanding of the complex issues that concern us all. My role is to give meaning to the facts, to place them in their historical and strategic context, and to offer a critical reading of events. ### Method and sources This text keeps the basic distinction between **verified facts and interpretive analysis**. The rule never changes: a factual claim is published only when a verifiable source supports it, and the sources this article actually used are listed under **Sources**, never here. **Primary source families** used by the publication, when the story has them: official statements from governments and international institutions, public statements by political leaders, reports from intergovernmental organisations, dispatches from recognised international news agencies. **Secondary source families**: specialised publications, internationally recognised news media, analyses from established research institutions, reports from industry organisations. When an article cites statistical, economic or geopolitical data, it comes from the institutions that produce it (intergovernmental organisations, central banks, national statistics offices), and the exact institution is named under **Sources**. ### Nature of the analysis The analyses, interpretations and perspectives in the analytical sections of this article are a **critical, contextual synthesis** based on the information available, the trends observed and the expert comments cited in the sources consulted. My role is to interpret these facts, to set them in the context of today's geopolitical and economic dynamics, and to give them a coherent meaning within the larger story of the changes shaping our time. These analyses reflect expertise built through continuous observation of international affairs and an understanding of the strategic mechanisms that drive global actors. This article describes a documented state of affairs on its publication date, not a prediction: later developments may shift its outlook. No update is promised in advance; when an article is corrected or completed, the change is dated in the text. ## Sources ### Primary sources - [Russia-Ukraine troop casualties study — The New York Times, July 1, 2026](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/01/us/politics/russia-ukraine-troop-casualties.html) - [Four Years Later: Russia's War on Ukraine — CSIS, official report](https://www.csis.org/programs/four-years-later-russias-war-ukraine) ### Secondary sources - [Study on Russian and Ukrainian military casualties — Charter97, July 1, 2026](https://charter97.org/en/news/2026/7/1/689758/) - [Ukraine war briefing: more than 2 million military casualties — The Guardian, July 2, 2026](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/02/ukraine-war-briefing-more-than-2-million-military-casualties-caused-by-russias-invasion-study-finds) - [Russia losing 8 troops for every 1 Ukraine soldier killed — New York Post, July 2, 2026](https://nypost.com/2026/07/02/world-news/russia-losing-8-troops-for-every-1-ukraine-solider-killed-report/) - [Casualties of the Russo-Ukrainian war — data compilation, accessed July 2026](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Russo-Ukrainian_war) --- Source: Maxime Marquette, MadMax. When citing, name the author and link https://mad-max.co/en/article/portrait-larmee-russe-une-machine-qui-a-sacrifie-14-million-dhommes