# NARRATIVE: Four years after Olenivka, the families are still waiting for a courtroom

> July 28, 2026 marks the fourth anniversary of the explosion that destroyed a barracks at the Volnovakha Penal Colony No. 120 in occupied Donetsk , where Ukrainian prisoners of war who had defended Mariupol and the…

- Author: Maxime Marquette
- Publisher: MadMax (https://mad-max.co)
- Section: Reportage
- Published: 2026-07-29
- Canonical URL: https://mad-max.co/en/article/narrative-four-years-after-olenivka-the-families-are-still-waiting-for-a-courtro

### An anniversary marked by a canceled gathering

**July 28, 2026** marks the **fourth anniversary** of the explosion that destroyed a barracks at the **Volnovakha Penal Colony No. 120** in occupied **Donetsk**, where Ukrainian prisoners of war who had defended **Mariupol** and the **Azovstal** plant were held, according to reports published by **Kyiv Post**, **UNN**, **United24 Media** and **mezha.net** on that date.

A **commemorative event** planned on **Independence Square** in Kyiv was **canceled for security reasons**, due to the threat of massive Russian air strikes, according to the **1st Azov Corps** of Ukraine's National Guard and the **Association of Families of Azovstal Defenders**. *Even gathering to mourn the dead of Olenivka became, four years later, a risk Kyiv could no longer take.*

### What this date means for Ukrainian families

For the **families of Azovstal defenders**, this fourth anniversary marks not only the memory of a tragedy, but also the persistence of a wait: for a **courtroom** that would formally establish responsibility for this explosion, four years after the fact.

This **wait** fits within a broader Ukrainian push for the creation of a **Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression**, a demand formally carried by Ukraine's **Foreign Ministry** on the occasion of this anniversary.

## What happened on the night of July 28 to 29, 2022

### The explosion that destroyed the barracks

On the night of **July 28 to 29, 2022**, an explosion destroyed a barracks at the **Volnovakha Penal Colony No. 120**, located in occupied Donetsk, where hundreds of Ukrainian prisoners of war were held, mostly **Mariupol defenders** captured after the fall of the **Azovstal** plant.

According to the **recognized toll** reported by several sources, including **Kyiv Post**, at least **50 to 53 Ukrainian prisoners of war** were killed that night, and between **70 and 130 others** were wounded, the exact figures varying slightly depending on the source consulted. *A barracks full of men who had already survived the war's hardest siege became, that night, a death trap.*

### Russian responsibility confirmed despite an initially disputed account

Russia initially attributed this explosion to a **Ukrainian HIMARS strike**, a version that **independent investigations** have since largely contradicted. An **Associated Press** investigation and a **United Nations** assessment confirmed **Russian responsibility** for this explosion, contradicting the Kremlin's initial account.

This **confirmation**, obtained by **independent bodies** outside the conflict, remains a central piece of the case Ukraine continues to bring before the international community four years after the fact.

## President Zelensky's words for this anniversary

### "An absolute evil that cannot help but kill"

Ukrainian President **Volodymyr Zelensky**, in a message posted on **Telegram** for this anniversary, said: "On the night of July 28-29, the Russians killed our people in Olenivka — brutally, treacherously, and with absolute cynicism. More than **50 Ukrainian prisoners of war** died, more than **100 were wounded**. This is a state that has complete contempt for life, an absolute evil that cannot help but kill. We must always remember who we are dealing with."

This **presidential statement**, picked up by several Ukrainian media outlets for the anniversary, fits a **continuity of official commemoration** that has never wavered since **2022** on the question of Russian responsibility for this tragedy. *Four years later, the president's words have lost none of their edge. The anger, for its part, has never had time to cool.*

### A reminder of how many prisoners have been freed since 2022

**Volodymyr Zelensky** also confirmed, in that same statement, that **9,613 people** have been recovered from Russian captivity since the war began, a figure that illustrates the scale of the ongoing prisoner-exchange work led by Ukraine, despite tragedies like Olenivka.

This figure of **9,613 people freed** is a **Ukrainian presidential claim**, reported here with its full attribution, without a separate independent confirmation available in the fact file consulted for this narrative.

## What Ukrainian military intelligence said

### "The largest terrorist attack against Ukrainian prisoners"

**Lieutenant General Oleg Ivashchenko**, head of Ukraine's **Main Intelligence Directorate** (GUR), said for this anniversary: "In the colony where the defenders of Mariupol were held, the Russians committed the largest terrorist attack against Ukrainian prisoners. More than **50 Ukrainian defenders** died, and **130 were wounded**."

This statement from Ukraine's **top military intelligence official** cites a wounded toll slightly higher than the one given by **President Zelensky**, a variation that illustrates the persistent difficulty of establishing a single, definitive human toll four years after the fact.

### Why this legal framing matters

The term "**terrorist attack**" used by **Lieutenant General Ivashchenko** fits a **deliberate legal framing strategy** pursued by Ukrainian authorities, who seek to establish this tragedy as a deliberate **war crime** rather than an accidental incident, with an eye toward a possible future proceeding before an international body.

This legal framing, if one day confirmed by a **competent international tribunal**, would carry direct consequences for the **individual criminal responsibility** of the Russian commanders who ran this penal colony at the time of the explosion.

## The surviving prisoners still held in Russia

### 46 severely wounded without adequate medical care

According to a report relayed by **UNN**, at least **46 severely wounded Ukrainian prisoners of war**, direct survivors of the Olenivka explosion, remain **held in Russia** **without access to adequate medical care**, under the threat of **fabricated trials**, according to information available for this anniversary.

This situation, if confirmed in its exact scale, would constitute a **continuing violation** of the **basic rights** of prisoners of war, four years after an explosion that already left them in a state of extreme physical vulnerability. *Surviving the explosion was not enough. They have had to survive, every day since, the absence of care.*

### 38 former Olenivka detainees prosecuted or convicted in Russia

According to a report from the **Media Initiative for Human Rights** (MIHR) published on **July 28, 2026**, at least **38 former detainees** of Olenivka's "**Barracks 200**" have been convicted or are currently facing criminal prosecution in Russia, a situation also confirmed by a separate report describing the opening of a trial targeting survivors of the Olenivka tragedy who belong to the Azov regiment.

This figure of **38 people** prosecuted or convicted illustrates the persistence of a **Russian judicial strategy** aimed at the very survivors of the explosion, rather than any acknowledgment of responsibility toward the victims.

## Ukraine's push for a special tribunal

### The Foreign Ministry demands greater international pressure

Ukraine's **Foreign Ministry** published, for this anniversary, a statement calling for **intensified international pressure** on Russia and greater support for the creation of a **Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression**, an international judicial mechanism distinct from the International Criminal Court.

This demand fits a long-running **Ukrainian diplomatic strategy** that seeks to establish a legal framework capable of judging not only individual war crimes, but also Russia's political and military decision to launch the full-scale invasion in **February 2022**.

### Why Olenivka remains a central symbol of this demand

The **Olenivka** explosion holds a central symbolic place in Ukraine's advocacy for a special tribunal, precisely because **Russian responsibility** there was confirmed by independent bodies — the **Associated Press** and the **United Nations** — unlike other cases where attribution remains more contested.

This **confirmed-case status** makes Olenivka particularly useful in Ukraine's **international advocacy strategy**, with each anniversary becoming an occasion to remind still-hesitant Western partners of this precedent. *A confirmed case is worth, in front of diplomats, more than ten unproven accusations.*

## The decision to cancel the Kyiv gathering

### A threat of massive Russian strikes behind the cancellation

The commemorative event originally planned on **Independence Square** in Kyiv to mark this fourth anniversary was **canceled**, according to the **1st Azov Corps** of Ukraine's National Guard and the **Association of Families of Azovstal Defenders**, due to a specific threat of **massive Russian air strikes** that day.

This cancellation decision illustrates the persistence of the **security risk** weighing on the **Ukrainian capital**, even for a purely civilian and symbolic commemorative event, four years after the start of the full-scale invasion.

### What this cancellation says about daily life in Ukraine in 2026

The fact that a gathering meant to honor the memory of **dead prisoners of war** itself had to be **canceled** out of fear of a new Russian attack illustrates, in particularly stark terms, the continuity of danger that shapes Ukrainian daily life, even in moments set aside for collective mourning.

This reality contrasts with the image of a conflict that, in some Western narratives, might seem to have stabilized or slowed after several years; the need to cancel a commemoration for security reasons is a reminder that the threat remains, in **2026**, fully active. *You do not cancel a gathering for the dead out of excessive caution. You cancel it because death is still circling.*

## What the Azovstal defenders' families are demanding

### A recognition that goes beyond symbolic commemoration

For the **Association of Families of Azovstal Defenders**, the **annual commemoration** of Olenivka is only one step among others in a broader demand: a **formal judicial recognition** of Russian responsibility, paired with real criminal consequences for the identified perpetrators.

This demand remains, four years after the fact, largely **unmet on the international judicial front**, despite the factual confirmation of Russian responsibility by recognized independent bodies.

### Still waiting for a trial that never comes

No **binding international judicial proceeding** has, to date, resulted in a **formal conviction** of Russian officials specifically for the Olenivka explosion, despite the converging conclusions of the **Associated Press** and the **United Nations** on Russian responsibility.

This absence of a trial remains, for the families concerned, the main source of frustration voiced at every anniversary, four consecutive years after a tragedy whose responsibility is, factually, no longer seriously in dispute. *Knowing who killed is not enough. The families are still waiting for someone to pay for it in front of a judge.*

## The broader context of Ukrainian prisoners of war in 2026

### A file that goes beyond the Olenivka case alone

The situation of the **38 former Olenivka detainees** now prosecuted or convicted in Russia fits within a broader file on the treatment of Ukrainian prisoners of war, which remains one of the most documented humanitarian friction points of the conflict since **2022**.

**Prisoner exchanges**, including the cumulative figure of **9,613 people freed** cited by President Zelensky, continue in parallel with these contested Russian judicial cases, illustrating the coexistence of two opposing dynamics: negotiated release on one side, criminal prosecution on the other.

### Why this duality complicates humanitarian diplomacy

This coexistence between **prisoner exchanges** and **Russian prosecutions** targeting some former detainees complicates Ukrainian humanitarian diplomacy, which must negotiate releases while simultaneously documenting alleged violations of the rights of prisoners already in custody.

This diplomatic complexity has not, to date, halted either the exchange negotiations or the ongoing documentation of violations; both processes continue in parallel, according to information available for this narrative.

## What this anniversary reveals about Ukrainian war memory

### A commemoration that structures the national calendar

The **Olenivka** anniversary now fits within a **calendar of commemorations** that structures **collective Ukrainian memory** of the conflict, alongside other significant dates tied to the siege of **Mariupol** and the resistance at **Azovstal** in 2022.

This structuring of memory plays a political and social role that goes beyond the judicial framework alone: it keeps alive, in Ukrainian and international public opinion, the pressure needed to keep demanding justice four years after the fact.

### The media's role in carrying this memory forward

Coverage of this anniversary by several outlets — **Kyiv Post**, **UNN**, **United24 Media**, **mezha.net** — illustrates the **continued role** of Ukrainian and international press in carrying this memory forward, four consecutive years after the initial tragedy. *Without a press that repeats, every year, what happened, forgetting would eventually finish the work that justice has not yet done.*

This repeated media coverage also serves as a direct counterweight to the initial, largely discredited Russian account, which had tried to attribute the explosion to Ukraine itself.

## What this case means for Ukraine's Western allies

### A reference case in the push for a special tribunal

For Ukraine's **Western partners** weighing the merits of creating a **Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression**, the Olenivka file offers a **concrete reference** already partly confirmed by independent bodies, making it a weighty argument in ongoing diplomatic discussions.

This kind of case, where responsibility is established but no criminal consequence has yet followed, illustrates precisely the jurisdictional gap that creating such a special tribunal would aim to fill for the full range of crimes committed during this war. *A confirmed fact with no court to judge it remains an unfinished justice, year after year.*

### Continued pressure through existing diplomatic channels

In the absence of an **already operational special tribunal**, Ukraine keeps bringing this case before **existing diplomatic channels**, notably through repeated statements at bodies like the **United Nations Security Council**, where the treatment of prisoners of war remains a regularly raised issue.

This **continued diplomatic pressure**, although it has not yet led to a **dedicated judicial mechanism**, keeps the Olenivka case alive on the international agenda four years after the fact.

## What might come next

### Possible scenarios for the 46 wounded still detained

The fate of the **46 severely wounded prisoners of war** still held in Russia without adequate medical access is, at this stage, the most immediate **humanitarian emergency** tied to the Olenivka case, one that could shift through future prisoner-exchange negotiations.

No **precise timeline** for a possible release of this specific group appears in the sources available for this narrative, leaving their situation in prolonged uncertainty four years after the explosion that wounded them. *Some Olenivka survivors are still waiting, right now, for the release that others have already received.*

### Persistent uncertainty over a dedicated judicial mechanism

The actual creation of a **Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression**, demanded again by Ukraine's Foreign Ministry for this anniversary, largely depends on the political support of Ukraine's Western partners, support that has not, to date, produced the formal creation of this mechanism.

This **persistent uncertainty** illustrates the difficulty, for Ukraine, of turning a **confirmed factual responsibility** into a concrete judicial consequence, a gap that runs through the entire story of this anniversary.

## What canceling the Kyiv event changes for future commemorations

### A precedent that could affect other commemorations

The **cancellation** of the **Independence Square** gathering for security reasons sets a precedent that could apply to other Ukrainian war commemorations, should the threat of **massive Russian air strikes** continue to loom over large public gatherings in the months ahead.

This precedent illustrates a growing tension between the need for **public collective memory** and the imperative of **physical safety** for civilians gathered together, a tension that has not, to date, found a stable resolution in Ukraine.

### The alternative forms of commemoration adopted instead

In the absence of a physical gathering on **Independence Square**, this anniversary's commemoration relied mainly on **official statements** — those of **Volodymyr Zelensky** and **Lieutenant General Oleg Ivashchenko** — along with coverage from several Ukrainian and international media outlets.

This dematerialized form of commemoration, if it becomes the norm for future anniversaries, would durably change how Ukraine publicly honors the memory of its prisoners of war who died in captivity. *A gathering can be canceled. The memory it was meant to carry cannot.*

## What this case teaches about wartime justice in general

### A textbook case for international criminal accountability

The **Olenivka** case offers, for **specialists in international criminal law**, a case study in the persistent gap between establishing factual responsibility and translating it into real judicial consequence, a gap that touches many other files from this war.

This gap between **established fact** and **justice delivered** shapes much of the current international debate over the need for new judicial mechanisms, like the **Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression** demanded by Kyiv.

### Why this case will remain under watch in the years ahead

As long as no **concrete criminal consequence** has been handed down against **identified officials** for the Olenivka explosion, this case will keep being cited by Ukraine and its supporters as a central argument in the push for more effective international justice against war crimes. *A case that stays open four years after the fact ends up becoming, against its will, a permanent symbol.*

Four years after the explosion that destroyed a barracks at the **Olenivka** colony, killing at least **50 to 53 Ukrainian prisoners of war** and wounding between **70 and 130 others**, Russian responsibility remains confirmed by the **Associated Press** and the **United Nations**, but no court has yet handed down a conviction.

**What is established**: the destruction of the barracks on the night of July 28 to 29, 2022, Russian responsibility confirmed by independent bodies, and the cancellation of Kyiv's commemorative gathering out of fear of new strikes. **What remains unresolved**: the creation of a special tribunal and the fate of the 46 wounded still held in Russia. *Olenivka remains a case settled on the facts and unsettled on justice. That dissonance, precisely, is what the families have carried for four years.*

Ukraine's **Foreign Ministry** keeps demanding greater international pressure, while **38 former Olenivka detainees** now face prosecution inside Russia itself. *The alleged executioners have never appeared in court. The survivors, instead, appear before Russian ones.*

This fourth anniversary, marked by a security cancellation rather than a public gathering, is a reminder that Olenivka's memory stays alive precisely because its justice still does not. *Remembering every year, for lack of being able to judge, is the only justice Ukraine can still render to Olenivka.*

**By Maxime Marquette, columnist**

## Columnist's transparency note

### Editorial stance

I am not a journalist but a **columnist and analyst**. My expertise lies in observing and analysing the geopolitical, economic and strategic dynamics that shape our world. My work is to take political strategies apart, to understand global economic movements, to put the decisions of international actors in context and to offer analytical perspectives on the changes that are redefining our societies.

I do not claim the cold objectivity of traditional journalism, which stops at reporting facts. **I claim analytical clarity**, rigorous interpretation and a deep understanding of the complex issues that concern us all. My role is to give meaning to the facts, to place them in their historical and strategic context, and to offer a critical reading of events.

### Method and sources

This text keeps the basic distinction between **verified facts and interpretive analysis**. The rule never changes: a factual claim is published only when a verifiable source supports it, and the sources this article actually used are listed under **Sources**, never here.

**Primary source families** used by the publication, when the story has them: official statements from governments and international institutions, public statements by political leaders, reports from intergovernmental organisations, dispatches from recognised international news agencies.

**Secondary source families**: specialised publications, internationally recognised news media, analyses from established research institutions, reports from industry organisations.

When an article cites statistical, economic or geopolitical data, it comes from the institutions that produce it (intergovernmental organisations, central banks, national statistics offices), and the exact institution is named under **Sources**.

### Nature of the analysis

The analyses, interpretations and perspectives in the analytical sections of this article are a **critical, contextual synthesis** based on the information available, the trends observed and the expert comments cited in the sources consulted.

My role is to interpret these facts, to set them in the context of today's geopolitical and economic dynamics, and to give them a coherent meaning within the larger story of the changes shaping our time. These analyses reflect expertise built through continuous observation of international affairs and an understanding of the strategic mechanisms that drive global actors.

This article describes a documented state of affairs on its publication date, not a prediction: later developments may shift its outlook. No update is promised in advance; when an article is corrected or completed, the change is dated in the text.

## Sources

### Primary sources

- [Kyiv Post — Ukraine demands justice on the anniversary of Olenivka — July 28, 2026](https://www.kyivpost.com/post/81267)

- [mezha.net — Ukraine marks the anniversary of the Olenivka tragedy — July 28, 2026](https://mezha.net/eng/bukvy/a71999ef_ukraine_marks_olenivka/)

### Secondary sources

- [UNN — We will not forget any crime against our people, Zelenskyy says on the anniversary of the Olenivka tragedy — July 28, 2026](https://unn.ua/en/news/we-will-not-forget-any-crime-against-our-people-zelenskyy-on-the-anniversary-of-the-olenivka-tragedy)

- [United24 Media — Ukraine's drone campaign disrupts two key Russian Azov Sea ports — July 27, 2026](https://united24media.com/war-in-ukraine/ukraines-drone-campaign-disrupts-two-key-russian-azov-sea-ports-21110)

- [NV.ua — Terrorist attack in Olenivka: memorial event for fallen Azov fighters canceled on Maidan — July 28, 2026](https://english.nv.ua/nation/terrorist-attack-in-olenivka-memorial-event-for-fallen-azov-fighters-canceled-on-maidan-50627875.html)

- [Kyiv Post — Daily update from the Ukrainian General Staff — July 28, 2026](https://www.kyivpost.com/post/81270)

---

Source: Maxime Marquette, MadMax. When citing, name the author and link https://mad-max.co/en/article/narrative-four-years-after-olenivka-the-families-are-still-waiting-for-a-courtro