# DECODING: 16 Refineries in May — How Ukraine Burns Russia's War Machine

> Sixteen Russian refineries struck in a single month — May 2026. Among them, 8 of the 10 largest in Russia. This is

- Author: Maxime Marquette
- Publisher: MadMax (https://mad-max.co)
- Section: Analysis
- Published: 2026-06-26
- Canonical URL: https://mad-max.co/en/article/decryptage-16-raffineries-en-mai-comment-l-ukraine-brule-la-machine-de-guerre-ru

## Introduction: An Industrial Campaign Without Precedent

### The number that sums up a strategy

**Sixteen Russian refineries struck in a single month** — May 2026. Among them, **8 of the 10 largest in Russia**. This is not tactical opportunism. This is not a run of lucky shots. This is a **systematic campaign, planned, executed with growing precision** by Ukraine's long-range drone force. Ukrainian minister Fedorov called it the "logistics blockade" — a strategy of strangling the **Russian** war machine through its fuel supply.

To understand what striking **16 refineries in May 2026** means, one must understand the energy geography of Russia's war. **Russia** depends on refined fuels to operate its tanks, its aircraft, its supply trucks at the front. It also depends on petroleum exports to finance its war budget. And its refining infrastructure — dispersed across an immense territory but vulnerable to long-range drones — has become the Archimedean lever of Ukraine's offensive strategy.

### The Moscow refinery: a target both symbolic and practical

The **Moscow refinery** — with a **processing capacity exceeding 12 million tonnes of crude per year** — was struck by **Ukrainian** drones and is not expected to resume operations before **2027**, according to data from **Militarnyi** and the **Kyiv Independent**. This single installation represented a significant fraction of fuel production for the Moscow region — Russia's most populous. **Its shutdown is a first-order economic and military event.**

But the **Moscow** refinery is only one example. The **Tyumen** plant — with a capacity of **7.5 to 9 million tonnes per year** — was struck on June 20. The **Orenburg** gas plant — with an annual capacity of up to **45 billion cubic meters** — struck on the night of June 24. **Russia's only helium plant** at Orenburg — used notably in the missile industry — targeted by **Ukrainian** drones. Each strike adds to the previous ones in an accumulation of industrial damage that is beginning to produce measurable effects.

*Sixteen refineries in May. I reread that number and try to visualize what it represents in terms of planning, intelligence, execution. Each strike requires an identified target, a planned drone route, coordinated timing, resistance to enemy defenses. It is a war industry in itself. And Ukraine excels at it.*

## Decoding the Strategy: What Is the "Logistics Blockade"?

### The logic of energy strangulation

The "**logistics blockade**" strategy described by Ukrainian minister Fedorov is conceptually simple but operationally complex. It rests on one premise: **the Russian army runs on fuel**. Its **T-80** and **T-90** tanks consume hundreds of liters per day of operation. Its ground attack aircraft — **Su-25**, **Su-34** — fuel up before each sortie. Its logistics truck columns transport food, ammunition, and equipment while burning diesel. Deprive that army of fuel, and you progressively immobilize it.

The chain is direct: refining → distribution → army. Attacking refining upstream creates a cascade effect downstream. **If refineries produce less, military depots receive less supply, and operational units progressively run short on fuel.** This is not immediate — Russia holds strategic reserves, has alternative supply sources, and can import on an emergency basis. But reserves deplete, and alternatives carry their own costs and lead times.

### Two vectors of impact: military and economic

The campaign against refineries has two distinct but complementary vectors of impact. The first is **military**: reducing fuel availability for Russian armed forces at the front. The second is **economic**: reducing Russian oil revenues, which directly finance the war budget. A refinery that is offline cannot transform crude into exportable products — which reduces Russia's hard currency earnings.

These two vectors reinforce each other. **Less fuel for the army means reduced operational capacity. Less oil revenue means a constrained war budget.** Cumulated over several months of systematic campaigning, these effects can weigh significantly on Russia's ability to sustain its war effort at its current intensity. This is slow but continuous pressure — whose effects could manifest before the end of 2026.

*Energy strangulation through oil — this is paradoxically a strategy the Allies used against Nazi Germany in the final years of World War II, with devastating effects on the Luftwaffe. Military history is being rewritten in Ukraine with drones instead of bombers. The logic, however, remains the same.*

## 8 of the 10 Largest Refineries: A Planned Targeting Strategy

### What targeting the largest ones means

Striking **8 of Russia's 10 largest refineries in a single month** reveals an **intelligence and target planning capability** of very high quality. First, you must identify the 10 largest — in terms of processing capacity, military fuel output, and economic importance. Then you must assess their specific vulnerability: local air defenses, distance from Ukrainian drone bases, most sensitive structural points.

Prioritizing the **largest** installations rather than randomly selecting or targeting easier smaller sites reveals a strategy of **maximizing impact per strike**. Hitting the Moscow refinery (12 million tonnes) has far greater effect than hitting ten small 1-million-tonne installations. Ukraine understood this arithmetic and applied it methodically.

### The geographic progression: from the periphery to the heart

The geographic progression of the campaign is also revealing. The first Ukrainian drone strikes targeted installations near the border or in immediately adjacent regions. Progressively, the range extended: **Moscow**, **Tyumen** in western Siberia, **Orenburg** near Kazakhstan. **Deep Russia is no longer out of reach.**

This geographic expansion carries major strategic significance: it forces Russia to defend not a front zone, but the entirety of its industrial territory — a task that no **air defense** system can accomplish completely. Dispersing Russian defensive resources across a 17-million-square-kilometer territory is itself a sought-after strategic effect.

*From Moscow to Tyumen to Orenburg — the map of Ukrainian strikes expands with every passing week. There is something inexorable about this progression. Ukraine is not retreating — it is advancing deep into enemy territory, where no one expected it.*

## Russia's Fuel Shortage: Documented Effects

### Moscow under rationing

The effects of the refinery campaign are beginning to manifest in documented ways. According to **Euromaidan Press** and **United24 Media**, **fuel rationing** measures have been imposed in the Moscow region. **Rosneft has suspended bulk gasoline sales**. **Tatneft has imposed a cap of 20 to 30 liters per customer**. These restriction measures, even if they may seem minor, carry real economic and psychological weight for the Russian population.

The documented loss stands at **600,000 barrels per day of refining capacity** (Moscow + Taneco), according to United24 Media. To put that in context: Russia refines roughly 5 to 5.5 million barrels per day. Losing 600,000 barrels of daily capacity represents approximately **11% of national capacity** — a significant figure, even if Russia can partially compensate through other installations and imports.

### 53 regions under shortage in May 2026

The impact is geographically dispersed. In **May 2026**, Russian oil production reached its lowest level in a year, and **53 of Russia's 85 regions** experienced fuel shortages, according to Euronews. This regional spread is particularly important: it means the shortage is hitting not only industrial zones and major cities, but also provincial regions where many military units and logistics depots are based.

From the **53 regions under shortage**, it is reasonable to infer that military bases and logistics depots in those regions are also affected. This link is not directly documented in available open sources — Russia does not publish data on the shortage's impact on its military operations — but the operational logic strongly suggests it. **A military logistics depot situated in a region under civilian shortage cannot be immunized against those same supply pressures.**

*53 regions under shortage. That is two thirds of Russia. That number deserves to stop you. This is no longer a campaign against a handful of industrial installations — it is a disruption affecting the daily life of a significant fraction of the Russian population. The war is beginning to hurt where it counts politically.*

## The Orenburg Helium Plant: A Particularly Strategic Target

### Helium in the missile industry

Among all the targets struck, the **Orenburg helium plant** deserves special attention. It is the **only major helium plant in Russia**, and it plays a critical role in the **missile industry** — helium being used for cooling certain electronic components and for pressurizing missile fuel tanks. A disruption to helium production in Russia could have cascading effects on the manufacture of certain types of missiles.

This strike illustrates the sophistication of Ukrainian targeting. Identifying the **Orenburg** helium plant as a critical link in the missile production chain — not merely in general industry — requires a level of intelligence on Russian military supply chains that goes well beyond what outside observers would have anticipated. **Ukraine possesses a remarkably precise intelligence picture of Russian industrial vulnerabilities.**

### The simultaneity with the Orenburg gas plant

The night of **June 24** saw the simultaneous striking of both the **Orenburg gas plant** — annual capacity up to **45 billion cubic meters** — and the neighboring **helium plant**. This simultaneous double strike on the same industrial zone suggests advanced operational coordination and a determination to maximize impact on the Orenburg industrial complex in a single night of operations.

**Orenburg is a border region with Kazakhstan**, far from the Ukrainian front. Reaching targets there with long-range drones represents a considerable logistical and technical effort — but Ukraine accomplished it. **Russian strategic depth is now an operational fiction.**

*The Orenburg helium plant — I would never have guessed it would be among Ukraine's priority targets. This is exactly the kind of precise industrial targeting that reveals the quality of Ukrainian intelligence. Somewhere, analysts have mapped the vulnerabilities of Russia's missile industry down to the helium supply. That is precision work.*

## The WSJ and Ukraine's "New Air-Power Paradigm"

### What the Wall Street Journal understood

The **Wall Street Journal**, in its opinion article of June 24, 2026 titled **"Ukraine's New Air-Power Paradigm"**, documented and analyzed what Ukraine's drone campaign represents for global military doctrine. The central argument: Ukraine has developed a **low-cost, high-precision, long-range air power** that challenges traditional paradigms of air superiority.

Traditionally, offensive air power required expensive fighter-bombers, piloted by highly trained aviators, operating from secured bases. This model is enormously costly — accessible only to major powers. The Ukrainian model — locally produced long-range drones at relatively low cost, operated remotely, capable of striking targets thousands of kilometers away — **democratizes deep-strike capability**.

### The implications for global military doctrine

This democratization has profound implications for global military doctrine. If a mid-size power like Ukraine can strike Russian refineries in Tyumen and **Orenburg** with relatively cheap drones, **what other powers can do what to whom?** That is a question every general staff worldwide is now asking — and whose answers will restructure defense investments for the next decade.

The answer is not simple. Ukrainian drones are effective against fixed, lightly defended targets like refineries. They are less so against hardened military targets, heavily defended by anti-drone systems. But even with these nuances, the Ukrainian model has demonstrated a strategic effectiveness that no one can ignore anymore. **The war of 2026 has produced a new doctrinal manual that 21st-century militaries will have to absorb.**

*The Wall Street Journal analyzing the Ukrainian "new paradigm" of air power — that is in some ways the mainstream recognition of what military observers had known for months. This war doctrine made in Ukraine is going to be exported. The question is who will export it to whom, and with what effects.*

## Rostov and the Gukovo Fuel Depot

### The special forces operation in Gukovo

The strike on a **fuel depot in Rostov** — documented by Euromaidan Press as an "SSO operation in Gukovo" with "confirmation of a major fire" — illustrates an additional dimension of the Ukrainian campaign: the synergy between **long-range drones** and **special operations**. The **SSO** (Ukrainian Special Operations Forces) have the capacity to operate across the border for specific missions.

Gukovo is a city in the Rostov region, near the Ukrainian border. A fuel depot in that area directly supplies Russian forces operating in the southern sector of the Ukrainian front — notably in the **Zaporizhzhia** and **Kherson** sectors. Its destruction or degradation has a direct operational effect on the supply logistics of Russian units in that part of the front.

### The diversification of attack vectors

Ukraine is not limited to drones for targeting Russian energy infrastructure. It uses a combination of **long-range drones**, **cross-border special operations**, adapted **Neptune missiles**, and other vectors to maximize pressure on these targets. This diversification is intentional: it prevents Russia from concentrating its countermeasures on any single type of attack vector.

**An effective anti-drone defense does not protect against special operations. A reinforced perimeter security does not protect against high-altitude drones.** By diversifying attack vectors, Ukraine creates a multidimensional threat that forces Russian defenses into dispersed, less effective investments.

*The diversification of attack vectors is a lesson from asymmetric warfare that Ukraine applies with mastery. Never be predictable, never concentrate your effort on a single method. Those who must defend against you spend their time plugging gaps rather than planning.*

## Russia's Economic Crisis: Reading the Signals

### The Bank of Russia under pressure

The **Bank of Russia** cut its key rate to **14.25%** on June 20 — less than market expectations, according to Euronews. This decision, weaker than anticipated, signals a tension between two contradictory imperatives: **inflation** (which demands higher rates to contain it) and the **need to stimulate an economy under pressure**. The coexistence of fuel shortages, inflation, and the budgetary cost of the war creates an economic equation that the Bank of Russia is managing with increasing difficulty.

Russia's **military spending** now represents a very large fraction of GDP — estimated at roughly 8 to 10% according to analysts. This level of military spending in a context of **sanctions**, industrial shortages, and massive human losses creates structural inflationary pressures that the central bank cannot resolve through monetary policy alone.

### Russian fuel sold to India regardless

An apparent paradox complicates the picture: **Russian maritime oil exports to India** reached record levels even after the American waiver expired on June 17, according to The National News. This means that despite the refinery strikes, Russia continues to export crude oil — generating hard currency revenue.

This paradox is explained by the distinction between **exported crude oil** and **domestically available refined products**. Russia can sell its crude to India even if its refineries are damaged — because India refines it domestically. But the domestic shortage of refined products (gasoline, diesel) remains real, because Russian refineries can no longer convert as much crude into finished products. **It is this domestic shortage of refined products that is hitting the Russian economy and military logistics.**

*The paradox of Russian oil — exported as crude to India while Russian gas stations ration — is emblematic of the distortions of a war economy under sanctions. Putin can still sell his crude. But his soldiers at the front are short on diesel. That is a contradiction that will have to be paid for.*

## The Limits of the Campaign: What It Cannot Do Alone

### Russian resilience underestimated

It would be inaccurate to present the refinery campaign as a miracle solution. Russia has demonstrated an economic resilience under pressure that many observers underestimated in 2022. It has diversified its commercial partners, maintained a certain level of exports, found alternative suppliers for **sanctioned** components, and counted on **China** for part of its quiet economic support.

The effects of the refinery campaign are real — the **53 regions under shortage**, the **Moscow refinery offline**, the **600,000 barrels of lost capacity** — but they are not yet sufficient to trigger a collapse of the Russian war machine. They are degrading it progressively. This progressive degradation is useful — but it must be combined with other pressures to produce a decisive effect.

### What is missing for the strategy to be fully effective

For the "logistics blockade" strategy to deliver its maximum effects, several additional conditions must be met. The **pressure of sanctions** on Russian imports of components and technologies must be maintained — or even reinforced. **Western financial support** for Ukraine must allow the pace of strikes to be maintained by supplying sufficient quantities of the drones being used. And **diplomatic pressure** on countries enabling Russia to circumvent sanctions — notably China — must be intensified.

**The refinery campaign is only one component of a multidimensional pressure strategy.** It is necessary, it is effective, it deserves to be sustained. But it cannot compensate, on its own, for failures in other dimensions of pressure on Russia. **An integrated strategy is the only one that can produce the desired outcome.**

*I reject catastrophism as much as triumphalism. The refinery campaign is real and effective. It is not decisive on its own. The truth lies somewhere between "it changes everything" and "it changes nothing." Military reality is rarely as clean as the narratives that surround it.*

## Russian Reactions: Propaganda and Countermeasures

### Russian communication in the face of refinery strikes

The **Kremlin** and Russian state media have adopted several strategies in the face of the refinery strikes. First strategy: **minimization** — denying or understating the damage. Second strategy: **victimization** — presenting strikes on industrial installations as Ukrainian "terrorist acts" against "Russian civilians." Third strategy: **distraction** — highlighting Russian strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure as legitimate retaliation.

These three strategies are in tension with observable reality. The **documented fuel shortages in 53 regions** are hard to deny for residents queuing at gas stations. Framing strikes on military-industrial refineries as "terrorism" rings hollow against images of Russian bombs hitting Odessa markets or Mykolaiv schools. **Russian propaganda is running up against the reality of its own failures to protect its territory.**

### Russian defensive countermeasures

On the operational level, Russia has attempted several countermeasures. It reinforced air defense around oil installations closest to the border. It deployed **electronic jamming systems** to disrupt Ukrainian drone navigation. It hardened physical access to certain facilities. These measures have had some effect — a number of drones have been shot down or diverted — but they have not stopped the campaign.

Russia faces an **impossible resource dilemma**: simultaneously protecting the military front, the capital, the Kerch Bridge, and oil installations scattered across thousands of kilometers — this is more than its available air defense systems can cover. **Ukraine exploits this inability to achieve total coverage with remarkable regularity and precision.**

*Russian countermeasures interest me as much as Ukrainian strikes. Every new defense Russia improvises reveals a vulnerability it had not anticipated. And every countermeasure consumes resources that are lacking elsewhere. This is the game of accelerated mutual adaptation. And Ukraine is winning it, for now.*

## The Fuel Crisis and the Donetsk Front: The Connection

### Fuel and front-line logistics

The connection between Russian fuel shortages and the situation at the **Donetsk** front is not directly documented in available sources. Russia does not publish data on the state of its front-line logistics supply. But the operational logic suggests a real relationship. **An army on the offensive in Donetsk consumes fuel in large quantities**: for its tanks, armored personnel carriers, artillery and supply trucks, reconnaissance drones, and command post generators.

If rear fuel depots are receiving fewer deliveries due to refining and transport disruptions, front-line units could progressively be forced to **ration their motorized operations**. This is not yet visible in available data — the 56 daily engagements and the pressure on **Kostiantynivka** suggest Russia is maintaining its offensive capacity. But the pressure is accumulating, and it will eventually manifest.

### Time as an ally of the Ukrainian strategy

The "logistics blockade" strategy is designed to produce its effects over time. This is not a single decisive strike — it is an **accumulation of pressures** that progressively degrades the Russian war machine's capacity. Time is this strategy's ally — and its enemy too, if Ukraine lacks the resources to sustain the pace of strikes over the required duration.

This is why the question of Western support is inseparable from any evaluation of the refinery campaign. The drones used cost money to produce. Components come from partners. Operator training requires resources. **Without sustained Western financial and material support, the campaign's pace cannot be maintained.** A long-term strategy requires long-term funding.

*The "logistics blockade" strategy is brilliant on paper and effective in practice. But it has an Achilles heel: it demands time, and time costs resources that Ukraine does not have alone. That is where Western support ceases to be a political choice and becomes a strategic necessity.*

## The Future of the Campaign: Toward What Targets?

### Beyond oil: the arms industries

Ukraine's campaign against Russian industrial infrastructure is not limited to oil. The strike on the **VZPP-S in Voronezh** — a transistor factory for missiles — illustrates an additional dimension: **targeting the arms industries**. Other factories — ammunition, electronic components, optical equipment — are presumably on the list of potential targets.

The logical progression of the campaign moves toward a diversification of industrial targets: **everything that feeds the Russian war machine** is a legitimate target. **Steel mills** that produce armor steel, **chemical plants** that produce explosives, **navigation complexes** that produce guidance components — all could potentially appear on the targeting list. This diversification is both the logical evolution of the strategy and a growing challenge in terms of intelligence and planning.

### The constraints that will limit the campaign

The campaign has its constraints. Ukrainian drones can be shot down — and they are, in numbers. Russia is improving its anti-drone defenses. Some targets are too well protected to be reached. Ukrainian drone production is constrained by component availability. And diplomatic pressures from certain partners potentially limit the types of authorized targets.

These constraints are real. They do not call into question the campaign's overall effectiveness — they define its operational limits. **Ukraine works within these limits with creativity and effectiveness.** The campaign will continue, evolve, and adapt. And its cumulative effects on the Russian war-fighting capacity will keep accumulating.

*The refinery campaign is one of the most fascinating — and most under-covered — chapters of this war. It unfolds far from the front, in factories that most observers did not know how to locate on a map. And yet it may be just as important as the battles of Kostiantynivka. This is the invisible war that determines the visible war.*

## The Environmental and Ecological Dimension of the Refinery Strikes

### Fires that pollute Russian territory

Ukraine's campaign against refineries has an environmental dimension that strategic analyses rarely mention. **Refinery fires** produce massive emissions of pollutants — **sulfur dioxide**, **volatile hydrocarbons**, **soot** — that affect surrounding populations and contribute to air pollution over vast areas. The fires at the Moscow refinery, visible from tens of kilometers away, exposed millions of Moscow residents to elevated pollution levels.

This environmental reality is a documented collateral consequence of the strikes — neither sought nor targeted as such, but real. Under the logic of international humanitarian law, collateral environmental damage is weighed against military advantage. It falls to specialized legal scholars to evaluate that balance. What can be said here: **the pollution caused by fires at Ukrainian-struck Russian refineries remains incomparable to the pollution caused by Russian strikes on Ukrainian energy infrastructure** — decades of contamination in some cases.

### Contamination of occupied territories: a Russian legacy

In parallel, it is worth noting that the **Russian army in occupied Ukrainian territories** has left behind documented environmental contamination: **pierced fuel depots**, **abandoned ammunition**, **soils contaminated with heavy metals** from destroyed shells and tanks. Ukraine's post-war reconstruction will include a considerable **environmental remediation** dimension — an additional cost of the Russian war that reconstruction estimates rarely explicitly include.

These two dimensions — the pollution caused by Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries and the contamination of Ukrainian occupied territories by Russia — are part of a broader environmental picture of the war that deserves specific analysis. **The ecological dimension of the conflict**, often overlooked in favor of military and economic data, is nonetheless a lasting reality whose effects will be felt long after the fighting ends.

*I would not have spontaneously thought to include the environmental dimension in this analysis. But it demands inclusion when you look at images of burning refineries — those columns of black smoke rising tens of kilometers into the sky. War pollutes everything: the sky, the soil, the water, the minds. And that reckoning too will one day have to be presented to the Kremlin.*

## The Human and Social Impact of Fuel Shortages in Russia: What the Data Reveals

### 53 regions in shortage: a map of Russia's territorial fracture

When **53 Russian regions** simultaneously report fuel shortages, we are no longer talking about a localized logistics incident. We are talking about a **systemic fracture** in national distribution. The hardest-hit regions are those that depend most on road transport for basic food supply — meaning regions far from major urban centers, where alternatives to trucking are nonexistent.

Available data reports **price increases** at the pump of up to 40% in some regions, and **queues** at gas stations that are reminiscent of Soviet-era shortages. This is not a media anecdote — it is an economic distress signal that the Moscow government cannot indefinitely mask behind a narrative of national resilience.

### Rationing as an admission of industrial failure

The rationing decisions taken by **Rosneft and Tatneft** are not the prudent measures of a well-managed company. They are admissions that domestic production can no longer simultaneously cover internal demand and military needs. A **war economy** normally functions by **reducing civilian consumption** to support the military effort — which is exactly what is happening, but without Moscow having the honesty to publicly acknowledge it.

The **Moscow refinery offline until 2027** is the most striking symbol of this reality. The capital of a country that prides itself on being an energy superpower can no longer adequately supply its own region from its own refining infrastructure. This is an economic humiliation as much as a logistical constraint, and Ukraine inflicted it with surgical precision.

*I take no pleasure in images of queues at Russian gas stations. But when a regime finances its war with the oil revenues of its people while hiding the real sacrifices from them, it deserves for its people to finally see the truth of the consequences. This is the war coming home.*

## Conclusion: The Fire That Burns the System

### What 16 refineries in May 2026 represents

Sixteen refineries in May 2026 — including 8 of Russia's 10 largest — represent far more than a strike count. They represent a demonstration of strategic capability: Ukraine is capable of conducting a systematic industrial campaign against deep Russia, targeting the most important installations with precision, sustaining a pace of operations over several weeks and months.

This campaign has measurable effects: **53 Russian regions under fuel shortage**, **600,000 barrels of lost capacity**, **the Moscow refinery offline until 2027**. It fits within a coherent strategy of progressively strangling the Russian war machine. **It may not change the war overnight. But it is changing it — slowly, surely, irreversibly.**

### The imperative of sustained support

For this campaign to deliver its maximum effects, Ukraine needs time — and resources to hold that time. Drones cost resources. Operations cost lives. Target planning requires continuous intelligence. **Western support — financial, material, political — is the sine qua non condition for this strategy to continue.**

The message is simple: every euro of support for Ukraine is not merely a gesture of solidarity — it is an investment in a strategy that works, that is degrading Russia, and that can, with time and perseverance, change the course of this conflict. **Sixteen refineries in May. And June barely getting started.**

*Sixteen refineries in May. This is not a statistic to put in a table in an annual report. This is a strategy that is literally burning the Russian war machine. Slowly. Inexorably. One tank at a time. And that counts.*

**By Maxime Marquette, columnist**

## Columnist's transparency note

### Editorial stance

I am not a journalist but a **columnist and analyst**. My expertise lies in observing and analysing the geopolitical, economic and strategic dynamics that shape our world. My work is to take political strategies apart, to understand global economic movements, to put the decisions of international actors in context and to offer analytical perspectives on the changes that are redefining our societies.

I do not claim the cold objectivity of traditional journalism, which stops at reporting facts. **I claim analytical clarity**, rigorous interpretation and a deep understanding of the complex issues that concern us all. My role is to give meaning to the facts, to place them in their historical and strategic context, and to offer a critical reading of events.

### Method and sources

This text keeps the basic distinction between **verified facts and interpretive analysis**. The rule never changes: a factual claim is published only when a verifiable source supports it, and the sources this article actually used are listed under **Sources**, never here.

**Primary source families** used by the publication, when the story has them: official statements from governments and international institutions, public statements by political leaders, reports from intergovernmental organisations, dispatches from recognised international news agencies.

**Secondary source families**: specialised publications, internationally recognised news media, analyses from established research institutions, reports from industry organisations.

When an article cites statistical, economic or geopolitical data, it comes from the institutions that produce it (intergovernmental organisations, central banks, national statistics offices), and the exact institution is named under **Sources**.

### Nature of the analysis

The analyses, interpretations and perspectives in the analytical sections of this article are a **critical, contextual synthesis** based on the information available, the trends observed and the expert comments cited in the sources consulted.

My role is to interpret these facts, to set them in the context of today's geopolitical and economic dynamics, and to give them a coherent meaning within the larger story of the changes shaping our time. These analyses reflect expertise built through continuous observation of international affairs and an understanding of the strategic mechanisms that drive global actors.

This article describes a documented state of affairs on its publication date, not a prediction: later developments may shift its outlook. No update is promised in advance; when an article is corrected or completed, the change is dated in the text.

## Sources

### Primary sources

- [Euromaidan Press: Safe Moscow is gone — Ukrainian drones hit Russian capital's region for the third time in four days — June 19, 2026](https://euromaidanpress.com/2026/06/19/safe-moscow-is-gone-ukrainian-drones-hit-russian-capitals-region-for-the-third-time-in-four-days/)

- [Kyiv Independent: Crimea power plant struck, Orenburg plants hit by Ukrainian drones — June 23, 2026](https://kyivindependent.com/crimea-power-plant-reportedly-struck-by-ukrainian-drones-as-peninsula-faces-outages/)

- [Euromaidan Press: Russo-Ukrainian War Day 1578 — June 20, 2026](https://euromaidanpress.com/2026/06/20/russo-ukrainian-war-day-1578/)

### Secondary sources

- [United24 Media: Russia imposes fuel rationing in capital after repeated Ukrainian drone attacks on oil infrastructure — June 19, 2026](https://united24media.com/war/russia-imposes-fuel-rationing-in-capital-after-repeated-ukrainian-drone-attacks-on-oil-infrastructure-19995)

- [Wall Street Journal: Ukraine's New Air-Power Paradigm — June 24, 2026](https://www.wsj.com/opinion/ukraines-new-air-power-paradigm-6edf1ad1)

- [Euronews: Fuel crisis and war costs — Bank of Russia flags risks of faster inflation — June 20, 2026](https://www.euronews.com/business/2026/06/20/fuel-crisis-and-war-costs-bank-of-russia-flags-risks-of-faster-inflation)

- [Militarnyi: Moscow refinery unlikely to resume operations after drone strikes until 2027 — June 24, 2026](https://militarnyi.com/en/news/moscow-refinery-unlikely-to-resume-operations-after-drone-strikes-until-2027-reuters/)

- [Kyiv Independent: Moscow oil refinery unlikely to resume operations this year after Ukrainian drone attacks — June 24, 2026](https://kyivindependent.com/moscow-oil-refinery-unlikely-to-resume-operations-this-year-after-ukrainian-drone-attacks/)

---

Source: Maxime Marquette, MadMax. When citing, name the author and link https://mad-max.co/en/article/decryptage-16-raffineries-en-mai-comment-l-ukraine-brule-la-machine-de-guerre-ru