# Brussels launches five joint defense projects ahead of NATO summit > On Friday, July 3, 2026, the European Commission proposed five major cross-border defense projects, opening the door to dedicated European funding, according - Author: Maxime Marquette - Publisher: MadMax (https://mad-max.co) - Section: Analysis - Published: 2026-07-07 - Canonical URL: https://mad-max.co/en/article/bruxelles-lance-cinq-projets-de-defense-communs-avant-le-sommet-de-l-otan ## Key takeaways - The five projects cover drones and counter-drone systems, maritime and seabed defense, space, air and missile defense, and reinforcing security on the eastern flank (Eastern Flank Watch). - The projects fall under the European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP), which has a 1.5 billion euro envelope; the Commission has allocated 325 million euros to launch them. - Projects must drive innovation, strengthen the defense industrial base, and reduce market fragmentation. Ukraine takes part in four of the five projects. - Commissioner Andrius Kubilius cited a combined funding ambition of about 190 billion euros by 2036. - The author argues the projects are a credibility test, given the recent cancellation of the Franco-German fighter program and the fact that only 24% of 2025 defense investment was collaborative, according to the European Defence Agency. ## Introduction: five projects to pull Europe out of military fragmentation ### An announcement timed carefully days before the Ankara summit On **Friday, July 3, 2026**, the **European Commission** proposed five major cross-border defense projects, opening the door to dedicated European funding, according to **Reuters**. The announcement comes just days before the **NATO** summit in **Ankara**, a timing that is no diplomatic accident. The five projects cover drones and counter-drone systems, maritime and seabed defense, space, air and missile defense, and reinforcing security on Europe's eastern flank, according to **Euronews**. Together, they represent a **structured attempt** to end decades of scattered, uncoordinated military procurement among **member states**. ### A context of accelerated European rearmament This initiative fits into a broader movement of **European rearmament**, as the Union's **defense budgets** jumped from **288 billion euros in 2023 to 381 billion euros in 2025**. It also comes shortly after last month's cancellation of the Franco-German next-generation fighter program, the **Future Combat Air System**, a failure that illustrates the persistent difficulties of European military-industrial cooperation. It is precisely this **chronic fragmentation** that the Commission is trying to correct with these five projects, by offering a joint funding framework for systems that most European countries could not develop alone. *After the failure of the Franco-German fighter, Europe needs concrete proof that continental military cooperation can still work. These five projects are a credibility test, not just a press release.* ## The legal and financial framework of the EDIP program ### A still-modest budget against the stated ambition These projects fall under the **European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP)**, which has an overall envelope of **1.5 billion euros**, according to **Adnkronos**. The Commission has allocated **325 million euros**, roughly **372 million dollars**, to support the setup and rollout of these European projects of common interest, according to **Reuters**. This amount remains modest compared with the combined funding ambition cited for the 2036 horizon, but it is above all **seed funding** meant to structure cooperation rather than to finance the full **weapons systems** targeted. ### Precise criteria to qualify as a project of common interest To be designated a European defense project of common interest, a project must meet three cumulative criteria: drive **innovation**, strengthen the competitiveness of Europe's defense industrial base, and reduce market fragmentation, according to **Reuters**. These criteria are explicitly meant to avoid repeating competing, redundant programs among member countries. The Commission, through **Henna Virkkunen**, commissioner for tech sovereignty, security, and democracy, summarized the goal this way: "there is a real need to move faster, to produce together, and to invest in security, and that is exactly what we are doing," according to **Euronews**. *325 million euros for five major industrial projects is a cautious start. Europe now has to prove that this seed funding will turn into real financial commitment, not a promise that evaporates at the next budget cycle.* ## The drone and counter-drone project, the largest of the five ### Twenty-six member states, plus Norway and Ukraine The **drone and counter-drone systems** project brings together **26 European Union countries**, along with **Norway** and **Ukraine**, according to **Reuters**. It is the largest of the five projects by number of participants, reflecting the perceived urgency in the face of mounting drone incursions that have hit several European countries in recent months. This near-universal participation reflects a shared realization: the drone threat, whether used for reconnaissance or direct attack, does not respect national borders and demands a **pooled technological response** rather than twenty-seven scattered national ones. ### Ukrainian experience as the project's central asset **Ukraine's** inclusion in this project is not symbolic: Kyiv today holds the most intensive **combat experience** in the world in drone warfare, acquired at a steep cost since 2022 against waves of Russian **Shahed** drones and the electronic **jamming systems** deployed by Moscow. Pairing this Ukrainian expertise with **European industrial capacity** could considerably shorten the **development cycle** for counter-drone systems that are genuinely combat-tested, rather than designed purely in a lab. *Including Ukraine in this project isn't a charitable gesture, it's a smart strategic decision. No European lab has the combat experience Kyiv has paid for in blood since 2022.* ## Eastern Flank Watch, thirteen countries against the Russian threat ### A project centered on the countries most exposed to Russia The project named **Eastern Flank Watch** brings together **thirteen** European Union countries, along with **Norway** and **Ukraine**, according to **Reuters**. It aims to strengthen detection and response capacity along Europe's eastern border, from **Finland** to **Bulgaria**, according to **Euronews**. This geographic scope is no accident: it corresponds precisely to the strategic front line most exposed to potential Russian aggression or provocation, including the Baltic states, Poland and Romania, all confronted with repeated incidents involving drones or unidentified aerial incursions. ### A direct response to recent drone incursions A series of drone incursions recently reignited questions about the ability of the **nine countries** on this eastern flank to deter and respond to potential threats, according to **Euronews**. This project seeks precisely to fill that capability gap through a **pooled surveillance** architecture. Without a common, interoperable early-warning system, each isolated incident will continue to be handled country by country, with uneven response times and technological standards that directly benefit anyone looking to test the limits of European vigilance. *Thirteen countries finally coordinating their vigilance on the eastern flank is exactly the kind of concrete response the surge in Russian drone incursions had long demanded.* ## Maritime and seabed defense, a blind spot neglected for too long ### Protecting undersea cables and critical infrastructure The third project focuses on **maritime and seabed defense**, an area long underfunded despite a rise in suspicious incidents affecting **undersea communication cables** and gas pipelines in the Baltic and North Seas in recent years. The vulnerability of this undersea infrastructure, on which a considerable share of Europe's internet traffic and energy flows depend, constitutes a **strategic weak point** that hostile actors have already exploited, making this project particularly urgent. ### Necessary coordination among national navies Historically, surveillance of European seabeds relied on scattered national capabilities, often redundant in some areas and entirely absent in others, an imbalance this joint project explicitly seeks to correct by pooling **sensors** and surveillance platforms. This greater coordination among national navies would also help reduce the **unit costs** of undersea detection equipment, an area where Europe has historically lagged behind Russian capabilities in **undersea hybrid warfare**. *It took several suspicious cable-cutting incidents for Europe to finally take the vulnerability of its seabeds seriously. Better late than never, but that delay has a cost.* ## Space defense, Europe's new strategic frontier ### A worrying dependence on non-European actors The fourth project concerns **space defense**, an area where Europe remains largely dependent on American capabilities and, to a lesser extent, other international partners for **satellite surveillance** and secure military communications. This strategic dependence exposes the European Union to real **geopolitical risks**, particularly in the event of a partial disengagement or a reorientation of **American priorities**, a scenario several defense analysts consider increasingly plausible. ### Building credible European space autonomy Developing a genuinely European defense space capability, including reconnaissance satellites, secure communication systems, and orbital threat-tracking capacity, is an indispensable long-term investment for any real **strategic autonomy**. Without this space autonomy, Europe would remain structurally dependent on third parties for functions as critical as **satellite intelligence** in times of crisis, a vulnerability incompatible with the stated ambition of strategic sovereignty. *A Europe that talks about strategic sovereignty without an autonomous space capability is telling itself a story. This space project may be the longest-term of the five, but it's also the most fundamental.* ## Air and missile defense, the lesson learned from Ukraine ### A fifth project directly inspired by the ongoing war The fifth project covers **air and missile defense as well as early warning**, according to **Reuters**. This choice is no accident: the war in **Ukraine** has dramatically demonstrated the critical importance, and the scarcity, of modern missile defense systems like the **Patriot**, whose shortage has directly affected Kyiv's ability to intercept Russian strikes in recent weeks. Here, the European Union is drawing a **direct lesson** from the Ukrainian conflict: without **sufficient interceptor stockpiles** and industrial production capable of keeping pace with wartime demand, even the best missile defense systems become ineffective against massive, repeated attacks. ### Anticipating rather than reacting to a growing ballistic threat This project aims to build European production and stockpiling capacity that would prevent the Union from finding itself, in the event of a major crisis, in the same critical shortage now affecting Ukraine on the missile-defense front. Early warning, an essential component of this project, would also allow faster detection of ballistic or cruise missile launches, reducing the **reaction time** needed to activate **European defensive systems**. *Had Europe learned this lesson as early as 2022, the Patriot shortage now hitting Ukraine might have been anticipated instead of discovered in the panic of a night under bombardment.* ## Ukraine's special role in four of the five projects ### An integration that goes beyond diplomatic symbolism **Ukraine** participates in four of the five announced projects, according to **Euronews** and **Adnkronos**. This massive integration of a non-EU country into strategic defense industrial projects shows just how much Kyiv is now seen as an essential **technological partner** rather than simply a recipient of military aid. This shift marks a **paradigm change**: Ukraine is no longer only the country receiving Western equipment, it is becoming the country transferring unique **combat expertise**, forged in adversity, into Europe's own defense industries. ### A winning bet for collective European security Integrating Ukraine into these joint projects also strengthens the overall strategic coherence: the systems developed will be directly tested and validated in the most demanding operational context currently available in Europe, that of the **Ukrainian front** itself. This bet on Ukrainian integration nonetheless carries **real practical challenges**, particularly around sharing sensitive technologies and protecting **military intellectual property**, issues the Commission will need to clarify in the coming months. *Making Ukraine a full industrial partner, not just a recipient of aid, is finally recognizing what Kyiv has demonstrated since 2022: a capacity for innovation under pressure that few European countries can match.* ## The long-term budget ambition, 190 billion euros by 2036 ### A figure that measures the real scale of ambition European Defence Commissioner **Andrius Kubilius** said these five projects represent a combined funding ambition of roughly **190 billion euros by 2036**, adding that they "will play a key role in strengthening member states' capabilities and will help keep Europe and Europeans safe," according to **Euronews**. This figure of 190 billion euros, compared with the Commission's **initial funding** of 325 million euros, illustrates the considerable gap between the current **institutional seed stage** and the real industrial ambition that will have to be financed largely by **member states** and the private sector. ### The challenge of turning ambition into firm budget commitments The recent history of European defense cooperation, marked by the failure of the Franco-German **next-generation fighter** program, calls for legitimate caution about the Union's ability to turn these numerical ambitions into **concrete achievements** delivered on the **announced timelines**. The difference between this new EDIP framework and past attempts will lie in the Commission's ability to maintain continuous pressure on **member states** to convert statements of intent into **firm contracts** and verifiable production schedules. *190 billion euros over ten years is an impressive figure on paper. But Europe has already learned, with the Franco-German fighter fiasco, that big numbers never guarantee big achievements.* ## The failure of the Franco-German fighter, a still-fresh lesson ### A flagship project abandoned last month The Franco-German **next-generation fighter** program, the **Future Combat Air System**, led notably by **Dassault** and **Airbus**, was abandoned last month, according to **Euronews**. This failure, coming just weeks before the announcement of the five new European projects, illustrates the persistent fragility of military-industrial cooperation between major European powers. **Industrial and political tensions** between the French and German partners over **division of labor** and technological control of the program ultimately doomed a project that, at its launch, had been presented as the future pillar of European combat aviation. ### What this failure demands in vigilance for the five new projects This recent failure calls for **particular vigilance** regarding the **governance** of the five new projects announced by the Commission: without a clear mechanism for dividing industrial responsibilities and resolving disputes between partners, the risk of repeating the Franco-German fighter scenario remains real. The structural difference this time lies in the European Commission's **direct involvement** as financial and institutional **coordinator**, a role Paris and Berlin had not entrusted to **Brussels** during the fighter program, which was left to purely bilateral negotiation. *The failure of the Franco-German fighter is not a simple industrial accident, it's a clear warning: without strong institutional arbitration, even the best European intentions eventually collapse under the weight of national egos.* ## The parallel financial support from the European Investment Bank ### A record loan granted to Airbus last week **European Investment Bank** president **Nadia Calviño** announced last week a **record loan** of **3 billion euros** for **Airbus**, a move that shows how Europe "is strengthening its capacity and its **strategic autonomy**," according to **Euronews**. This loan, separate from the five defense projects announced by the Commission, nonetheless illustrates a **convergence of European financial initiatives** all aimed at the same goal: reducing Europe's industrial and technological dependence on external suppliers in critical strategic sectors. ### A financial mobilization that goes beyond the EDIP framework alone This parallel financial mobilization, combining Commission funds, European Investment Bank loans, and expected contributions from **member states** themselves, is shaping a more complex but potentially more resilient European defense **funding architecture** than in the past. The multiplication of these complementary **funding channels** could, if well coordinated, reduce the vulnerability of the entire system to the failure or delay of a single financial instrument, a **direct lesson** drawn from the sector's recurring budgetary difficulties. *A 3-billion-euro loan to Airbus the same week as the announcement of the five defense projects is not a calendar coincidence, it's a deliberate communications strategy to project an image of total European mobilization.* ## The 3.5% of GDP target, a goal spearheaded by Washington ### American pressure now shaping the European agenda The new defense spending target of **3.5% of GDP by 2035** for **NATO** members is described as a commitment pushed first and foremost by U.S. President **Donald Trump**, according to **Euronews**. This **American pressure**, though sometimes perceived as blunt in its phrasing, has had the merit of accelerating a European rearmament debate that had been dragging on for years. The announcement of the five joint European defense projects fits directly into this dynamic: it allows the European Union to show, just days before the **Ankara summit**, that it takes seriously the expectations of its main transatlantic ally on **burden-sharing**. ### Trump, a demanding but necessary ally for Western firmness While **Trump's** method of pressuring his European allies draws legitimate diplomatic criticism, the net effect of that pressure, namely a real acceleration of **European rearmament** against Russia, directly serves the West's **collective security** interests. This dynamic illustrates an uncomfortable but real truth: Europe needed insistent outside pressure to accelerate a **defense cooperation** it should, in theory, have built on its own initiative long ago. *Whether European chancelleries like it or not, Trump's pressure on burden-sharing has produced more concrete results in a few months than years of European summits on rearmament.* ## What chronic coordination delays actually cost Europe ### Only 24% of defense investment made jointly According to a finding from the **European Defence Agency** cited by **Euronews**, only **24% of the defense investment** made by **member states** in 2025 was done collaboratively, a proportion described as "unevenly distributed" depending on the country and capability area concerned. This figure reflects a persistent reality: the **vast majority of European countries** continue to buy their military equipment largely on their own, rather than through joint purchases that could otherwise reduce unit costs and increase interoperability between allied forces. ### Desynchronized acquisition cycles that limit economies of scale The European Defence Agency also notes that **acquisition and replacement cycles** for military equipment remain largely desynchronized between member countries, which considerably limits opportunities for joint investment and large-scale production. Correcting this structural desynchronization is a far more complex **governance** challenge than simply funding new joint projects: it means changing national procurement habits deeply entrenched for decades within every European defense apparatus. *Twenty-four percent of joint investment after years of talk about European defense unity is a number that should embarrass European capitals more than it currently does.* ## What China and Russia are watching in this European mobilization ### A signal of resolve that does not go unnoticed in Moscow For **Moscow**, the coordinated announcement of five major European defense projects, explicitly involving **Ukraine** in four of them, sends a **clear signal** that Europe does not intend to ease its structural support for Kyiv, regardless of how the conflict on the ground evolves in the short term. This long-term signal matters more than the precise amount of **initial funding**: it tells Russian military planners that Europe's **defense industry** is now organizing to sustain a prolonged war and deterrence effort, rather than a one-off aid package destined to fade. ### China, an attentive observer of an industrial precedent **China**, for its part, is closely watching Europe's ability to structure an effective multinational defense industrial cooperation, a **model** that could eventually be invoked by other **regional blocs** facing similar security challenges against authoritarian powers. The success or failure of these five European projects will therefore carry a resonance that goes well beyond the continent, serving as a **full-scale test** of the viability of multinational **defense cooperation** against **shared strategic adversaries**. *China isn't just watching the funding figures, it's assessing whether Western democracies are still capable of cooperating effectively against a common threat. These five projects are also a credibility test aimed at Beijing.* ## Conclusion: a credibility test for European strategic autonomy ### Foundations laid, but nothing guaranteed yet These five joint European defense projects lay real institutional and financial foundations, but their success will depend entirely on **member states'** ability to turn these announcements into firm industrial contracts, honored **production schedules**, and funding actually disbursed in the years ahead. ### An opportunity Europe can no longer afford to miss Facing the convergence of threats posed by Russia, China, Iran and North Korea, Europe can no longer afford the failure of another major **defense cooperation** initiative. The Franco-German fighter precedent is a reminder that institutional ambition alone never guarantees industrial success. *This analysis ends on a simple conviction: every institutional brick matters in building genuine European strategic autonomy, even if the road remains long and littered with past failures.* **By Maxime Marquette, columnist** ## Columnist's transparency note ### Editorial stance I am not a journalist but a **columnist and analyst**. My expertise lies in observing and analysing the geopolitical, economic and strategic dynamics that shape our world. My work is to take political strategies apart, to understand global economic movements, to put the decisions of international actors in context and to offer analytical perspectives on the changes that are redefining our societies. I do not claim the cold objectivity of traditional journalism, which stops at reporting facts. **I claim analytical clarity**, rigorous interpretation and a deep understanding of the complex issues that concern us all. My role is to give meaning to the facts, to place them in their historical and strategic context, and to offer a critical reading of events. ### Method and sources This text keeps the basic distinction between **verified facts and interpretive analysis**. The rule never changes: a factual claim is published only when a verifiable source supports it, and the sources this article actually used are listed under **Sources**, never here. **Primary source families** used by the publication, when the story has them: official statements from governments and international institutions, public statements by political leaders, reports from intergovernmental organisations, dispatches from recognised international news agencies. **Secondary source families**: specialised publications, internationally recognised news media, analyses from established research institutions, reports from industry organisations. When an article cites statistical, economic or geopolitical data, it comes from the institutions that produce it (intergovernmental organisations, central banks, national statistics offices), and the exact institution is named under **Sources**. ### Nature of the analysis The analyses, interpretations and perspectives in the analytical sections of this article are a **critical, contextual synthesis** based on the information available, the trends observed and the expert comments cited in the sources consulted. My role is to interpret these facts, to set them in the context of today's geopolitical and economic dynamics, and to give them a coherent meaning within the larger story of the changes shaping our time. These analyses reflect expertise built through continuous observation of international affairs and an understanding of the strategic mechanisms that drive global actors. This article describes a documented state of affairs on its publication date, not a prediction: later developments may shift its outlook. No update is promised in advance; when an article is corrected or completed, the change is dated in the text. ## Sources ### Primary sources - European Commission — EDIP: Forging Europe's Defence, 2026 - Reuters — EU Commission proposes five major cross-border defence projects, July 3, 2026 - Euronews — European Commission attempts to spur EU defence teamwork with five new major projects, July 3, 2026 ### Secondary sources - Adnkronos — EU launches 5 common defense projects, from drones to missiles, July 3, 2026 - CNBC — Europe defense stocks rearmament, July 1, 2026 - Foreign Policy — analyses of European strategic autonomy, 2026 --- Source: Maxime Marquette, MadMax. When citing, name the author and link https://mad-max.co/en/article/bruxelles-lance-cinq-projets-de-defense-communs-avant-le-sommet-de-l-otan