# Bessent launches Trump accounts and defends the president's crypto gains > Introduction: a historic launch amid a media storm - Author: Maxime Marquette - Publisher: MadMax (https://mad-max.co) - Section: Note - Published: 2026-07-03 - Canonical URL: https://mad-max.co/en/article/billet-bessent-lance-les-comptes-trump-et-defend-les-gains-crypto-du-president ## Introduction: a historic launch amid a media storm ### Six million accounts already opened before the big day U.S. **Treasury Secretary** **Scott Bessent** gave an exclusive interview to **CBS News** on **July 2, 2026**, two days before the official launch of the **Trump Accounts**, savings accounts for American children. According to him, more than **six million accounts** have already been opened, out of roughly **70 million eligible children** nationwide. Starting **July 4, 2026**, the **250th anniversary** of the United States, the federal government will begin depositing **$1,000** into the accounts of children born between **January 1, 2025**, and **December 31, 2028**. ### A new mechanism for stock donations **Bessent** also announced that wealthy shareholders, foundations, and corporations will now be able to donate **shares of stock** directly to children's accounts, an administrative addition meant to facilitate the **philanthropic** generosity already observed since the program's launch. This measure adds to the landmark **$6.25 billion** contribution announced by **Dell Technologies** founder **Michael Dell** and his wife **Susan Dell**, intended for children who do not receive the initial **$1,000** deposit. ## A crypto story looming over the entire interview ### $1.4 billion in gains that are hard to ignore **Bessent's** interview came at a particular moment: the recent disclosure of **$1.4 billion** in **cryptocurrency gains** for President **Donald Trump**, a revelation that immediately raised questions about possible **conflicts of interest** at the top of the U.S. government. Asked directly about this sensitive topic, the Treasury Secretary brushed off the criticism, declaring: **"I don't think there's an appearance problem,"** a line that convinced neither independent commentators nor **Democratic opposition lawmakers**. ### A defense that raises questions about Treasury's independence This unconditional defense of the president's personal financial interests, coming from the administration's top economic official, illustrates a troubling closeness between **Trump's** private finances and the institutions meant to provide independent oversight of those same matters. The fact that this defense came at the exact moment of the launch of a **social program** presented as benefiting all American children creates an ethical contrast that **Bessent** made no attempt to address directly. ## Inflation and gas prices, a blind spot he owns ### "We're going to get through it," Bessent promises Asked about the lasting economic impact of the conflict with **Iran** on American families' purchasing power, **Bessent** struck a reassuring but vague tone, saying: **"We're going to get to the other side of all this, inflation** is going to come back down." He also floated a possible return of **gas prices** to around **$3** a gallon in several states. This promise, made with no precise timeline or concrete mechanism, contrasts with the numerical precision the same **Bessent** uses when discussing decades-long **growth** projections for the **Trump accounts**. ### A double standard on the precision of numbers This rhetorical asymmetry, in which promises about children's savings are quantified down to the dollar over fifty years while questions about immediate inflation remain deliberately vague, speaks volumes about the current American administration's communication priorities. Families struggling today to pay their grocery bills have little use for projections stretching to 2076; they need concrete answers about the immediate cost of living. ## The detailed financial mechanics of the Trump accounts ### Automatic investment in American stock markets The **Trump Accounts**, also known as **530A** accounts under the U.S. **tax code**, work like individual retirement accounts for children. The funds are automatically invested in an index fund tracking the **S&P 500**, with management fees capped at **0.10%** per year, a limit designed to protect small savers. According to official projections published on **TrumpAccounts.gov**, the initial $1,000 deposit could grow to roughly **$243,000** by age **55** with no additional contributions, assuming a historical average annual return of more than **10%**. ### Capped contributions, but multiple sources Beyond the initial deposit from the **U.S. Treasury**, families, **employers**, and charitable organizations can collectively contribute up to **$5,000** per year per child, a cap that will adjust for inflation after 2027. Several major companies, including **Uber**, **Intel**, and **IBM**, have already announced plans to contribute to their employees' accounts. This diversity of funding sources is, on a technical level, one of the program's strongest features, even though it structurally favors children whose parents have access to generous employers or philanthropic networks. ## Financial literacy, the program's other bet ### Fifteen learning modules for families new to the stock market The **U.S. Treasury** has developed fifteen learning modules available on **trumpeconomy.gov**, designed to introduce families who have never invested in the stock market to the basics of **financial markets**. According to **Bessent**, roughly **38%** of American households currently hold no investments in the **stock markets**. This educational dimension, often overshadowed by debates about the president's personal gains, is nonetheless one of the strongest arguments the administration has offered to justify the scale of this unprecedented social program. ### A bet on shifting economic mindsets **Bessent** presents this educational component as a real-time learning opportunity, with families able to check their child's account balance directly from their cellphone, an approach that banks on ongoing engagement rather than a single deposit forgotten for **eighteen years**. Whether this educational strategy will actually transform the long-term savings habits of millions of American families, or remain a symbolic gesture with no lasting impact on their real financial behavior, remains to be seen. ## Criticism flying despite the official enthusiasm ### A program its critics call inequitable Several economists and **Democratic** lawmakers have criticized the **Trump Accounts** program, pointing out that wealthier families, able to contribute the annual maximum of **$5,000**, will reap a disproportionate benefit compared with low-income families who can only count on the government's initial deposit. **Bessent** firmly rejected this criticism, calling some critics **"out of touch"** with the reality of American families who, in his view, will all benefit from a financial boost they would never have received otherwise. ### A debate that goes beyond a purely technical question This debate over the program's structural fairness reflects a broader tension in current American economic policy: how to reconcile a stated desire to reduce inequality with a mechanism that, by design, further benefits those who already have the means to contribute more. This tension will not disappear once the program simply launches on **July 4**; it will continue to fuel American public debate over **social** and fiscal justice for years to come. ## Comparison with foreign savings programs ### An American model inspired by foreign precedents The concept of a state-funded savings account from birth is not a purely American invention: several Western countries, including the **United Kingdom** with its former **Child Trust Fund** program, experimented with similar mechanisms before abandoning them for lack of sustained long-term funding. The **United States**, however, stands out for the scale of private funding mobilized alongside the initial government deposit, a hybrid approach between philanthropy and public policy that has no direct equivalent elsewhere in the Western world. ### A lesson to draw from past failures The British experience with the **Child Trust Fund**, abandoned in **2011** for budgetary reasons, offers an important lesson: without sustained political commitment over several decades, even the best-designed child savings programs risk collapsing at the first change in government or budget priorities. Nothing at this stage guarantees that the **Trump Accounts** will politically survive a potential change of administration in **Washington**, adding another layer of uncertainty to the promise of savings at eighteen or **fifty-five**. ## The geopolitical dimension of an unapologetic popular capitalism ### A deliberate contrast with rival economic models The **Trump** administration readily presents the **Trump Accounts** as proof of the superiority of the American capitalist model over state-directed economies in **China** or **Russia**, a program that would connect its youngest citizens directly to financial markets from birth rather than keeping them at arm's length from capitalism. This ideological dimension, rarely spelled out publicly by **Bessent** himself, nonetheless comes through in his recurring description of the program as the **"greatest merger in history"** between **Wall Street** and **Main Street**. ### A bet on long-term economic loyalty By financially tying millions of young **Americans** to the stock markets from birth, the administration also hopes to create an entire generation of citizens with a direct financial stake in the continued prosperity of **American capitalism**, a very long-term political strategy that goes well beyond the sole goal of individual savings. This ideological ambition, however bold, offers no guarantee that American financial markets will see the same sustained growth over the next fifty years as they did over the past half-century. ## Conclusion: a double-edged symbol for Trump's America ### A technical success hard to separate from the crypto controversy The launch of the **Trump Accounts** on the very day of the American **250th anniversary** is, on a strictly technical level, a notable **logistical achievement** for the **Trump** administration, with millions of families already enrolled before payments even officially began. But this achievement remains inseparable, in media coverage as in the public mind, from the awkward defense **Bessent** had to give regarding the president's personal **cryptocurrency** gains, a reminder that even the most popular social policies cannot entirely escape the shadow of this administration's ethical controversies. ### The real test still lies ahead The true test of this program will not play out in the coming days of celebration, but over the decades ahead, when the first beneficiaries turn eighteen and discover whether this promise of intergenerational savings truly held up against the ups and downs of financial markets. **By Maxime Marquette, columnist** ## Columnist's transparency note ### Editorial stance I am not a journalist but a **columnist and analyst**. My expertise lies in observing and analysing the geopolitical, economic and strategic dynamics that shape our world. My work is to take political strategies apart, to understand global economic movements, to put the decisions of international actors in context and to offer analytical perspectives on the changes that are redefining our societies. I do not claim the cold objectivity of traditional journalism, which stops at reporting facts. **I claim analytical clarity**, rigorous interpretation and a deep understanding of the complex issues that concern us all. My role is to give meaning to the facts, to place them in their historical and strategic context, and to offer a critical reading of events. ### Method and sources This text keeps the basic distinction between **verified facts and interpretive analysis**. The rule never changes: a factual claim is published only when a verifiable source supports it, and the sources this article actually used are listed under **Sources**, never here. **Primary source families** used by the publication, when the story has them: official statements from governments and international institutions, public statements by political leaders, reports from intergovernmental organisations, dispatches from recognised international news agencies. **Secondary source families**: specialised publications, internationally recognised news media, analyses from established research institutions, reports from industry organisations. When an article cites statistical, economic or geopolitical data, it comes from the institutions that produce it (intergovernmental organisations, central banks, national statistics offices), and the exact institution is named under **Sources**. ### Nature of the analysis The analyses, interpretations and perspectives in the analytical sections of this article are a **critical, contextual synthesis** based on the information available, the trends observed and the expert comments cited in the sources consulted. My role is to interpret these facts, to set them in the context of today's geopolitical and economic dynamics, and to give them a coherent meaning within the larger story of the changes shaping our time. These analyses reflect expertise built through continuous observation of international affairs and an understanding of the strategic mechanisms that drive global actors. This article describes a documented state of affairs on its publication date, not a prediction: later developments may shift its outlook. No update is promised in advance; when an article is corrected or completed, the change is dated in the text. ## Sources ### Primary sources - [Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Trump accounts — CBS News, July 3, 2026](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyyMC6x5NW0) - [Bessent on Trump's crypto earnings: "I don't think there's an appearance problem" — CBS News, July 2, 2026](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/scott-bessent-trump-crypto-earnings-trump-accounts-inflation/) ### Secondary sources - [Trump Accounts for kids launch July 4: What parents need to know — CNBC, July 1, 2026](https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/01/trump-accounts-launch-july-4.html) - Trump Accounts launch July 4, giving newborns $1,000 — ABC News, July 2, 2026 - [Trump accounts sign up more than 5 million kids: Treasury — CNBC, April 15, 2026](https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/15/trump-accounts.html) - [Treasury Announces the Launch of the Trump Accounts App — U.S. Department of the Treasury, June 8, 2026](https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0508) --- Source: Maxime Marquette, MadMax. When citing, name the author and link https://mad-max.co/en/article/billet-bessent-lance-les-comptes-trump-et-defend-les-gains-crypto-du-president