# ANALYSIS: Chinese Deterrence Puts Itself on Display in the Pacific, and the World Worries

> On July 6, 2026, a ballistic missile fired from a Chinese nuclear submarine flew over northern Luzon, in the Philippines, before splashing down in waters between Nauru and Tonga, according to data reported by USNI News…

- Author: Maxime Marquette
- Publisher: MadMax (https://mad-max.co)
- Section: Analysis
- Published: 2026-07-20
- Canonical URL: https://mad-max.co/en/article/analysis-chinese-deterrence-puts-itself-on-display-in-the-pacific-and-the-world

## Key takeaways

- The launch was reportedly only the third Chinese long-range missile test toward the Pacific, and it was meant in part to assess the JL-3 missile, with a range above 10,000 km.
- Japan sought transparency, Australia's Penny Wong called it destabilizing, and New Zealand's Winston Peters called it concerning and unwelcome.
- Defense News reports the test likely did not technically violate the Treaty of Rarotonga, since the warhead was a training dummy, though New Zealand said it ran against the treaty's object and intention.
- Beijing said the test was safe and professional, while state media Global Times took a more aggressive tone.
- The New York Times called Xi Jinping's claim of a fully operational nuclear triad exaggerated, and the Type 096 submarine is already in development.

## Introduction: one launch, one region, a new strategic reality

### A missile that crossed far more than an ocean

On **July 6, 2026**, a **ballistic missile** fired from a Chinese nuclear **submarine** flew over northern **Luzon**, in the **Philippines**, before splashing down in waters between **Nauru** and **Tonga**, according to data reported by **USNI News** and **The Diplomat**. This launch, only the third of its kind conducted by **China** toward the **Pacific** Ocean according to **The Diplomat**, immediately triggered reactions in several capitals across the region.

It was not the distance covered that struck observers most, but the strategic message this launch was clearly meant to send: **China** now holds a credible capability to strike distant targets from undersea platforms that are hard to detect, a capability that redefines the balance of **nuclear deterrence** across the entire **Indo-Pacific** region.

### A demonstration that fits an ambition for a complete triad

According to **Reuters**, this launch was meant in part to assess the real technical capabilities of the **JL-3** missile, with a range exceeding **10,000 kilometers** and capable of carrying multiple nuclear warheads, a weapon publicly unveiled for the first time at **Beijing**'s military parade in **September 2025**. That range would let **China** threaten North American targets, including **Guam** and **Hawaii**, without necessarily having to dangerously approach the American mainland.

This technical demonstration fits within the broader ambition voiced by **Xi Jinping** to give **China** a fully operational **nuclear triad**, combining land-based missiles, strategic bombers and ballistic-missile submarines, an ambition the **New York Times** nonetheless called exaggerated given its current state of concrete achievement.

*This launch is not just one more technical demonstration. It is a clear signal sent to the entire region: China wants the world to know it can now strike far, from the depths, and that this capability will only keep growing in the years ahead.*

## Regional reactions: a widely shared concern

### Japan, on the front line of regional concern

**Japan** was among the first countries to react officially, the Chinese launch having had an impact located outside its **exclusive economic zone**, but close enough to justify a one-day advance notification about a danger zone including part of its EEZ south of **Cape Shionomisaki**, according to **The Diplomat**. Japan's cabinet secretary-general, **Kihara Minoru**, called the lack of transparency surrounding this launch a matter of serious concern.

This Japanese reaction, measured but firm, reflects a broader concern shared by several regional democracies: **China** continues to strengthen its long-range strike capabilities without offering the transparency its neighbors consider necessary to maintain a minimal climate of regional trust.

### Australia and New Zealand, the most critical voices

Australia's foreign minister, **Penny Wong**, called this launch a "destabilizing" factor "for the region," according to **The Diplomat**. Her New Zealand counterpart, **Winston Peters**, was even more direct, describing the launch as a "concerning and unwelcome" development, while warning against any future normalization of this kind of test, stating that his region had "no interest in seeing China use the South Pacific as a testing ground for its missile capabilities."

These Australian and New Zealand reactions, among the most critical issued by governments in the region, reflect growing exasperation with tests that, while legally questionable rather than clearly illegal, are seen as a repeated affront to the strategic calm of the **South Pacific**.

*When Australia and New Zealand, two countries usually measured in their diplomatic statements, choose words this direct, it is a sign that regional patience with these repeated Chinese tests is seriously running out.*

## The South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone, a symbolic red line

### The Treaty of Rarotonga and its precise provisions

The Chinese launch affected waters close to **Nauru** and **Tuvalu**, two member states of the **South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone**, established by the **Treaty of Rarotonga** signed in **1986**, according to **Defense News**. That treaty bans the stationing and testing of nuclear weapons in the region, as well as any threat against member countries involving the use of such weapons.

Strictly on the legal level, this launch does not necessarily constitute a direct violation of the treaty, the missile's warhead being a training dummy with no real nuclear charge, according to available information. This technical distinction has not, however, been enough to ease the concerns expressed by several **Pacific** nations.

### A violation of the spirit, if not the letter, of the treaty

Several regional governments, including **New Zealand**, said this launch ran counter to the "object and intention" of the **Treaty of Rarotonga**, even if it did not technically violate its exact letter, according to **Defense News**. **Australia** expressed similar concerns, stressing that the spirit of regional denuclearization was being weakened by this kind of repeated military demonstration.

This distinction between technical violation and symbolic violation illustrates a recurring difficulty of international law: a treaty can remain legally respected while being, in practice, systematically sidestepped by tests that clearly betray its founding spirit, without ever crossing the red line strictly defined by its text.

*Respecting the letter of a treaty while trampling its spirit is exactly what Beijing is doing with this test. This legal hypocrisy should fool no one, least of all the Pacific nations that signed this treaty in good faith forty years ago.*

## The Chinese response: minimize and reassure

### Beijing invokes compliance with international norms

The spokesperson for **China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs**, **Mao Ning**, said the launch had been "conducted in a safe, standardized and professional manner throughout," urging other countries not to "over-interpret" this test, according to **Defense News**. She also indicated that **China** had provided several hours of advance notification before the launch.

This Chinese communication, which stresses compliance with international procedures and the non-threatening nature of the test, clearly seeks to defuse regional criticism without abandoning the show of force this launch objectively represented for military observers in the region.

### Chinese state media, more aggressive in tone

**Global Times**, Chinese state media, adopted a markedly more aggressive tone, claiming this test "will force outside powers and their followers to abandon their attempts to force Chinese concessions through maximum military pressure or preemptive strikes," according to **Reuters**. This language, far more martial than that of the **Ministry of Foreign Affairs**, reveals a domestic-politics dimension meant to project an image of strength to the Chinese public itself.

This contrast between measured official diplomatic communication and the markedly more aggressive tone of state media illustrates a two-tier communication strategy typical of the Chinese regime: reassure international interlocutors while feeding, internally, a nationalist narrative that reinforces the regime's legitimacy before its own population.

*Beijing plays on two registers at once: diplomatic restraint for abroad, martial pride for its domestic public. This double messaging should remind the West that reassuring Chinese statements never tell the whole story.*

## The JL-3's role in the global strategic equation

### A range that fundamentally changes the deterrence calculus

The **JL-3** missile, with a range exceeding **10,000 kilometers**, would let **China** threaten targets on the American mainland from undersea patrol areas much closer to its own coasts, reducing the exposure of its submarines to American and allied detection capabilities deployed in the western **Pacific**, according to analysis from **Reuters**.

This technical feature fundamentally transforms the American strategic calculus: U.S. naval and surveillance forces can no longer be content to monitor the immediate approaches to the mainland, but must now widen their vigilance zone to far larger maritime spaces, including significant portions of the South and Central **Pacific**.

### What Collin Koh observes about Chinese intentions

Analyst **Collin Koh**, of the **S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies** in **Singapore**, assessed, according to **Reuters**, that **China** is likely seeking to demonstrate that even if it cannot position itself to strike the American mainland, it could still target **Guam** and **Hawaii** from positions far more accessible to its current submarine fleet.

This expert assessment underscores that the **JL-3**'s range should not be read in isolation, but as part of a broader strategy aimed at methodically widening the range of American and allied targets **China** could threaten from patrol zones that are increasingly difficult for Western forces to monitor.

*Guam and Hawaii rather than the American mainland is no consolation, it is a brutal reminder that tens of thousands of American citizens and service members already live within range of this new Chinese capability.*

## Persistent doubts about Chinese operational reliability

### Purges within the Rocket Force, a worrying signal

Despite this technical demonstration, the **Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists** noted that the purges led by **Xi Jinping** within the command of the **Rocket Force**, the unit responsible for China's strategic missiles, make an actual transfer of real nuclear warheads to these platforms unlikely outside a major crisis scenario, according to information reported by **Reuters**.

These purges, which have hit several senior high-ranking officers in recent years, raise legitimate questions about the trust **Xi Jinping** himself places in his own nuclear chain of command, an uncertainty that complicates the Western assessment of the real operational readiness of China's undersea arsenal.

### A 2022 American report that had already anticipated this trajectory

A **Pentagon** report published in **2022** had already noted that **China** had begun conducting near-continuous deterrence patrols with its ballistic-missile submarines, a development that directly foreshadowed the demonstration observed in **July 2026**, according to **Reuters**. This continuity across successive American assessments confirms that the Chinese trajectory, while concerning, is not entirely unpredictable for Western intelligence services.

This relative predictability, while partially reassuring about the West's ability to anticipate future developments, in no way diminishes the gravity of the trajectory itself, which continues to bring **China** closer to a fully operational and militarily hard-to-contest undersea nuclear deterrent.

*The fact that Xi Jinping purges his own nuclear chain of command is not a reassuring detail, it is an additional cause for concern. A regime that does not trust its own nuclear generals is a regime whose intentions and internal stability deserve very close scrutiny.*

## Western surveillance: how America and its allies track these submarines

### A multilayer detection network already in place

The **United States** and its regional allies have a sophisticated surveillance network to track the movements of Chinese submarines, combining warships equipped with advanced sonars, fixed undersea sensor networks, and regular aerial patrols carried out by **P-8 Poseidon** aircraft, according to **Reuters**. This multilayer setup allows, with varying degrees of precision, tracking of the Chinese submarine fleet's movements in the region.

This surveillance network, developed and refined over decades during the **Cold War** and then adapted to new Asian strategic realities, nonetheless remains under pressure from the continuous expansion of the Chinese submarine fleet and the gradual improvement in acoustic stealth of its newest vessels.

### A technological race that will not end anytime soon

This competition between Western detection capabilities and Chinese undersea stealth capabilities constitutes, in itself, a crucial dimension of today's **undersea nuclear competition**, with every technological advance on one side triggering a technological response on the other, in a dynamic that recalls, in many respects, the undersea arms race of the **Cold War**.

This dynamic, documented by many naval security experts, suggests a continuous intensification of Western investment in undersea detection technologies, as the Chinese fleet keeps modernizing and gaining acoustic stealth over the years.

*This race between detection and undersea stealth will rarely make headlines, but it is shaping, in the shadow of the oceans, the balance of power that will determine the security of millions of people for decades.*

## Implications for Taiwan and the South China Sea

### A demonstration that weighs on the strait calculus

This demonstration of Chinese undersea capability cannot be separated from the broader context of persistent tensions around **Taiwan** and the **South China Sea**, where **Beijing** continues to assert territorial claims contested by several neighboring countries, notably the **Philippines** and **Vietnam**.

A **China** with a strengthened undersea nuclear deterrent could, in theory, feel more confident taking greater conventional risks in these contested areas, calculating that its overall strategic deterrent protects it against nuclear escalation in the event of a localized conventional confrontation.

### The link between strategic deterrence and regional assertiveness

This link between strengthened strategic nuclear deterrence and increased regional conventional military assertiveness is a concern documented by several defense think tanks, which believe **Beijing**'s growing strategic confidence could translate into a more aggressive posture in its non-nuclear territorial disputes with its immediate neighbors.

This dynamic, if confirmed in the months ahead, would justify heightened vigilance not only on the strictly nuclear level, but across the entire spectrum of regional tensions directly involving **Taiwan** and the countries bordering the **South China Sea**.

*A China more confident in its nuclear deterrent is not necessarily a China more cautious in its conventional territorial ambitions. It might be the opposite we should fear, and Taiwan knows this better than anyone.*

## Comparing Chinese, Russian and American capabilities

### Where China really stands in this three-way race

Despite the documented progress of its submarine fleet, **China** remains, according to most defense analysts, behind the far more established undersea capabilities of the **United States** and **Russia**, both powers holding decades of additional operational experience in continuous undersea nuclear deterrence.

This relative lag does not, however, stop the current Chinese trajectory from worrying Western planners, as the speed of Beijing's technical and operational progress far exceeds what has historically been observed among other emerging nuclear powers in recent decades.

### The Type 096, the next step already in preparation

According to **The Diplomat**, **China** is already developing the next generation of ballistic-missile submarines, designated **Type 096**, meant to succeed the six **Jin-class** submarines currently based on **Hainan** island. This development confirms that **Beijing** does not view its current capability as an endpoint, but as an intermediate step in a continuous modernization trajectory.

This anticipation of a new generation of submarines, potentially quieter and better armed, should prompt Western defense planners to invest now in tomorrow's detection technologies, rather than settling for adapting their current capabilities to Chinese platforms already in service.

*China never settles for catching up, it is already planning the next step while the West is still debating the previous one. This difference in pace should worry us more than the technical capability itself.*

## What this demonstration reveals about Beijing's chosen timing

### A date coincidence that does not seem accidental

According to **The Diplomat**, this launch took place two days after the **250th anniversary of American independence**, and only hours after the announcement of a mutual defense pact between **Australia** and **Fiji**. This double calendar coincidence, though not officially acknowledged by **Beijing** as intentional, has fueled speculation about a possible strategic message deliberately synchronized with these two symbolic events.

Without direct proof confirming a deliberate intent to synchronize, this double coincidence remains striking enough that several regional analysts interpret it as a calculated signal rather than a mere calendar accident devoid of symbolic weight.

### The Australia-Fiji pact, a context that illuminates the launch

The mutual defense pact between **Australia** and **Fiji**, announced just before the Chinese launch, illustrates a broader dynamic of strengthening Western security alliances in the South **Pacific**, a region where **Beijing** has, for several years, actively sought to expand its own network of bilateral agreements with small island nations.

This competition for influence, playing out as much on the diplomatic as the military field, further contextualizes the Chinese launch: beyond its strictly technical dimension, it fits within a broader struggle for influence over which power, Western or Chinese, will shape the future security architecture of the South **Pacific**.

*Two days after the American national holiday, hours after an Australia-Fiji pact: coincidence or message, the result is the same. Beijing knows exactly where and when to seize the world's attention, and that calendar precision should never be underestimated.*

## The debate over a complete nuclear triad, between ambition and reality

### What Xi Jinping publicly claims

According to the **New York Times**, **Xi Jinping** has expressed determination to give **China** a fully operational **nuclear triad**, combining land, air and undersea capabilities, an ambition that fits the Chinese regime's broader will to position itself as a nuclear power equal to the **United States** and **Russia** on the international stage.

This public claim, relayed by Chinese state media, targets a domestic audience as much as an international one, seeking to consolidate the regime's legitimacy by projecting an image of a fully mature and technologically accomplished nuclear power.

### Why the New York Times calls it exaggeration

The **New York Times**, however, called this claim of a fully operational **nuclear triad** an exaggeration, stressing that **China** remains far from having submarines capable of operating undetected at will anywhere in the world, a capability the **United States** and **Russia** took decades to develop and perfect.

This rigorous journalistic assessment recalls the importance of distinguishing official Chinese rhetoric from documented operational reality, a crucial distinction to avoid both dangerous underestimation and alarmist overestimation of China's real capabilities in this sensitive strategic domain.

*There is a difference between claiming a complete nuclear triad and actually possessing one that works reliably. The New York Times is right to point this out: Xi Jinping's rhetoric must never be mistaken for documented operational reality.*

### A collective voice beginning to be heard

Despite this structural asymmetry, small **Pacific** island nations are beginning to raise an increasingly assertive collective voice, notably through regional bodies like the **Pacific Islands Forum**, which has, in the past, expressed similar concerns about historical nuclear tests conducted in the region by other powers.

This collective mobilization, if it continues to strengthen, could form a modest but symbolically important diplomatic counterweight against great powers that continue to treat the South **Pacific** as a mere strategic testing ground rather than a region inhabited by fully sovereign nations.

*No one asked Nauru, Tonga or Tuvalu for their opinion before a Chinese missile splashed down in their waters. This indifference toward the sovereignty of small island nations should shock us far more than it currently does in international debate.*

## Next steps expected by defense analysts

### Increasingly frequent deterrence patrols

Defense analysts expect a gradual increase in Chinese deterrence patrols in the months and years ahead, as the **Jin-class** submarine fleet continues to accumulate operational experience, and as development of the **Type 096** continues toward a future deployment not yet precisely dated by available sources.

This increased patrol frequency, if confirmed, will force Western and allied forces to maintain a constant and costly level of vigilance, in a long-haul competition that, for now, shows no sign of slowing on either side of the **Pacific**.

### What the region will need to watch first

The next indicators to watch closely include the frequency of future similar Chinese tests toward the **Pacific**, the progress of **Type 096** development, as well as the concrete diplomatic and military response that South **Pacific** nations, particularly signatories of the **Treaty of Rarotonga**, choose to adopt in the face of this newly documented strategic reality.

This collective vigilance, if effectively structured in the months ahead, could constitute one of the region's most significant responses to a Chinese trajectory that continues to accelerate with no clear brake currently observable.

*Every new Chinese test toward the Pacific brings the region a little closer to a tipping point where normalization becomes irreversible. It is now, not in five years, that the collective response must begin to take shape.*

## What historical precedents of Chinese Pacific launches reveal

### Only a third launch, but a clear trajectory

This launch of **July 6, 2026** is, according to **The Diplomat**, only the third Chinese long-range missile test toward the **Pacific**, after a previous **ICBM** launch conducted in **September 2024** from a mobile launcher based on **Hainan** island. This relative rarity of this type of test underscores its exceptional rather than routine character, despite Chinese communication efforts to present it as normal training.

This trajectory, though made up of only three documented tests to date, traces a gradual acceleration in the frequency and sophistication of these demonstrations, each one providing new technical elements about the real state of progress of China's undersea nuclear program.

### Why this rarity makes every test more significant

Precisely because this type of test remains rare, every new occurrence carries disproportionate informational value for Western intelligence services, which must extract maximum technical and strategic insight from every documented launch, lacking a larger sample of comparable tests to refine their predictive models.

This rarity also imposes methodological caution on analysts: extrapolating definitive conclusions from only three documented tests carries risks of error that journalistic and analytical rigor must explicitly acknowledge, rather than yielding to hasty generalizations based on such a limited sample.

*Three documented tests are not a large sample, and I would rather admit the limits of what we can conclude from them than pretend to certainty the data does not support. That honesty is itself part of rigorous analysis.*

## What this displayed deterrence means for Canada and the West

### A threat that is no longer merely regional

Although this launch took place in the South **Pacific**, far from North American shores, the range of the **JL-3** missile and China's stated ambition for a complete **nuclear triad** directly concern all Western democracies, including **Canada**, whose strategic security remains closely tied to that of its American neighbor against any emerging nuclear threat.

This expanded geographic reality reminds us that today's **undersea nuclear competition** can no longer be seen as a strictly Asian issue, but as a global security file demanding sustained attention from all **NATO** members and their **Pacific** partners.

### Why Western indifference would be a costly mistake

Persistent Western indifference to this documented Chinese trajectory would risk letting **Beijing** gradually normalize an increasingly assertive nuclear posture, without encountering the diplomatic and strategic resistance needed to slow this dynamic before it becomes irreversible.

That is why rigorous coverage of this file, far from being an academic exercise reserved for defense specialists, directly concerns the future security of all Western democracies, including those that believe themselves geographically distant from the immediate epicenter of this strategic competition.

*The South Pacific may seem far from Mercier or Ottawa, but nuclear deterrence knows no border of indifference. What is happening beneath those distant waters will shape the security of the entire West, including our own.*

### What Western citizens should demand from their governments

Facing this documented trajectory, citizens of Western democracies should demand greater transparency from their governments about the concrete measures being considered to respond to this Chinese buildup, rather than settling for generic diplomatic statements that reassure no one about the substance of the file.

This democratic demand for transparency and accountability constitutes, ultimately, one of the best safeguards Western societies have against authoritarian regimes that, for their part, never provide equivalent accountability to their own population about their real strategic ambitions.

## Conclusion: a deterrence on display, a world that must respond

### What this launch revealed beyond its technical range

The Chinese launch of **July 6, 2026** revealed far more than a simple technical range capability: it revealed an openly stated strategic ambition, a two-tier communication between diplomatic restraint and domestic nationalist pride, and a geopolitical reality in which small **Pacific** nations continue to bear the consequences of decisions made by powers that never directly consult them.

This demonstration of Chinese **deterrence**, however concerning, still falls far short of the fully operational **nuclear triad** that **Xi Jinping** publicly claims, a crucial distinction that rigorous journalistic coverage of this file must never lose sight of.

### What the West must now collectively take on

Facing this documented trajectory, the **West** and its **Pacific** partners will need to collectively take on reinforced vigilance, greater transparency toward their own populations, and a diplomatic response that goes beyond simple statements of concern to translate into concrete measures of surveillance and proportionate deterrence.

Without this collective and sustained response, **China** will keep methodically pushing back the limits of what the region and the world consider acceptable, until this new strategic reality becomes as normalized as it is irreversible for decades to come.

**By Maxime Marquette, columnist**

## Columnist's transparency note

### Editorial stance

I am not a journalist but a **columnist and analyst**. My expertise lies in observing and analysing the geopolitical, economic and strategic dynamics that shape our world. My work is to take political strategies apart, to understand global economic movements, to put the decisions of international actors in context and to offer analytical perspectives on the changes that are redefining our societies.

I do not claim the cold objectivity of traditional journalism, which stops at reporting facts. **I claim analytical clarity**, rigorous interpretation and a deep understanding of the complex issues that concern us all. My role is to give meaning to the facts, to place them in their historical and strategic context, and to offer a critical reading of events.

### Method and sources

This text keeps the basic distinction between **verified facts and interpretive analysis**. The rule never changes: a factual claim is published only when a verifiable source supports it, and the sources this article actually used are listed under **Sources**, never here.

**Primary source families** used by the publication, when the story has them: official statements from governments and international institutions, public statements by political leaders, reports from intergovernmental organisations, dispatches from recognised international news agencies.

**Secondary source families**: specialised publications, internationally recognised news media, analyses from established research institutions, reports from industry organisations.

When an article cites statistical, economic or geopolitical data, it comes from the institutions that produce it (intergovernmental organisations, central banks, national statistics offices), and the exact institution is named under **Sources**.

### Nature of the analysis

The analyses, interpretations and perspectives in the analytical sections of this article are a **critical, contextual synthesis** based on the information available, the trends observed and the expert comments cited in the sources consulted.

My role is to interpret these facts, to set them in the context of today's geopolitical and economic dynamics, and to give them a coherent meaning within the larger story of the changes shaping our time. These analyses reflect expertise built through continuous observation of international affairs and an understanding of the strategic mechanisms that drive global actors.

This article describes a documented state of affairs on its publication date, not a prediction: later developments may shift its outlook. No update is promised in advance; when an article is corrected or completed, the change is dated in the text.

## Sources

### Primary sources

- [China's Pacific SLBM Test Signals a New Phase in Undersea Nuclear Competition — The Diplomat, July 7, 2026](https://thediplomat.com/2026/07/chinas-pacific-slbm-test-signals-a-new-phase-in-undersea-nuclear-competition/)

- [China Tests Submarine-launched Ballistic Missile, Kicks Off Annual Exercise With Russia — USNI News, July 6, 2026](https://news.usni.org/2026/07/06/china-tests-submarine-launched-ballistic-missile-kicks-off-annual-exercise-with-russia)

- [Missile test showcases sensitive Chinese submarine capabilities key to nuclear deterrent — Reuters, July 10, 2026](https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/missile-test-showcases-sensitive-chinese-submarine-capabilities-key-nuclear-2026-07-10/)

### Secondary sources

- [Chinese ballistic missile test is said to undermine nuclear weapons-free zone in South Pacific — Defense News, July 7, 2026](https://www.defensenews.com/global/asia-pacific/2026/07/07/chinese-ballistic-missile-test-is-said-to-undermine-nuclear-weapons-free-zone-in-south-pacific/)

- [Why China Fired a Long-Range Missile Into the Pacific — The New York Times, July 7, 2026](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/07/world/asia/china-missile-test-submarine-pacific.html)

- Regional coverage of the Chinese Pacific missile launch — Al Jazeera, July 7, 2026

---

Source: Maxime Marquette, MadMax. When citing, name the author and link https://mad-max.co/en/article/analysis-chinese-deterrence-puts-itself-on-display-in-the-pacific-and-the-world