# ANALYSIS: Georgia, Arizona — Trump's Endorsement Machine Stalls in the Republican Primaries

> For years, a Trump endorsement was a guaranteed win in any Republican primary. The June 2026 primary season is changing that calculus — a MAGA candidate loses by 19 points in Arizona, and Georgia isn't as easy as it should be.

- Author: Maxime Marquette
- Publisher: MadMax (https://mad-max.co)
- Section: Analysis
- Published: 2026-06-20
- Canonical URL: https://mad-max.co/en/article/analyse-georgie-arizona-la-machine-dendossement-de-trump-grippe-dans-les-primaires-repub

## Introduction: The First Cracks in MAGA's Invincibility

### Trump's Republican invincibility: myth or reality?

For years, American politics operated on a simple axiom: in a Republican primary, a Donald Trump endorsement is a guarantee of victory. Those he blesses win. Those he curses lose. His grip on the conservative electorate seemed absolute, his power over the primary machinery unstoppable. The June 2026 primary season is seriously challenging that certainty. **In Arizona, a MAGA candidate loses by 19 points.** In Georgia, Trump's late endorsement of Representative **Mike Collins** over **Derek Dooley** creates a complex, uncertain dynamic — far from the effortless dominance of previous years.

These results do not mean Trump is politically finished — far from it. They mean something more nuanced and perhaps more important for the Republican Party's future: **monolithic MAGA is beginning to fracture under the combined pressure of a diversifying voter base, an administration accumulating controversies, and an independent electorate that remembers broken promises.** The Trump endorsement machine still has power. But it is no longer infallible.

### Context: 2026, a decisive midterm year

The June 2026 primaries unfold in an especially charged political environment. Trump's national approval is at historically low levels, particularly in swing states like Arizona. **His net approval rating in Arizona stands at -17 in the latest polls,** according to Noble Predictive Insights — and his economic approval is even worse, at -27. These numbers, in a state Trump won by 5 points in 2024, illustrate rapid political deterioration.

The 2026 midterm season is critical for the Republican house. Multiple Senate seats, dozens of governorships, and hundreds of House seats are at stake. In this context, primaries are not just a test of loyalty to Trump — they are a test of electoral viability in November. And some Republicans are beginning to decouple those two equations.

*I watch these results with particular interest because they illustrate something I have been sensing for months: MAGA as a politically coherent movement is fragmenting. Not exploding — fragmenting. Fault lines are appearing between unconditional loyalists and electoral pragmatists. This is the beginning of a realignment whose effects will be measured in electoral cycles, not weeks.*

## Georgia's Collins-Dooley Race: The Endorsement That No Longer Guarantees Anything

### Collins, the near-perfect MAGA archetype

Representative **Mike Collins** is, in the current American political taxonomy, a near-perfect specimen of the MAGA candidate. Since his first congressional campaign in 2022, he has aligned himself unreservedly with Trump — repeating Trump's unsupported claims about the 2020 elections, voting consistently in the president's direction, co-sponsoring the **Laken Riley Act** mandating detention of immigrants accused of certain offenses, and publicly identifying as "a MAGA defender from the very beginning." His profile matches point for point what the Trump apparatus seeks in a Republican senator from Georgia.

Trump, in his endorsement posted on a Sunday morning in mid-June, described Collins as someone who had been "with him from the very start" and called him a "true, fighting W-A-R-R-I-O-R." For Collins, that endorsement was the political lifeline he had hoped for to pull ahead of Dooley in a final sprint before the following Tuesday's runoff.

### Dooley, the challenge from outside MAGA

**Derek Dooley**, a former football coach backed by outgoing Governor **Brian Kemp**, represents a radically different political profile. A first-time candidate, he admitted not having voted for nearly two decades — an explosive revelation in a Republican primary where electoral loyalty is a credibility test. His campaign rests on the argument that a candidate less associated with MAGA's most extreme positions would have better odds against Democratic Senator **Jon Ossoff** in November, in one of the most closely watched Senate races of the midterm season.

The relationship between Kemp and Trump is itself laden with history. Kemp had refused to participate in Trump's attempts to overturn Georgia's 2020 electoral results — a decision that earned him Trump's fury and a failed attempt to eliminate him in the 2022 gubernatorial primary. Dooley's endorsement by Kemp is therefore also, in subtext, a test of Kemp's enduring influence and Georgia's established Republican network against the MAGA movement.

*Georgia best illustrates the Republican dilemma of 2026: choose candidates most loyal to Trump, or choose candidates most capable of winning in November in an increasingly competitive state. These two objectives are diverging. And the Republican Party has not yet resolved that tension.*

## Arizona: The 19-Point Loss That Shattered Certainties

### The result that shocked Washington

If Georgia illustrates the complexity of MAGA dynamics, Arizona is a far more direct political earthquake. In a contest held around June 17, 2026, a Trump- and MAGA-backed candidate **lost by 19 points** — a margin that turned what had been billed as a competitive race into a crushing defeat. American press headlines were blunt: "Trump MAGA Republicans Lose Shock Election in Arizona by 19 Points." The surprise was total; political commentators were left scrambling.

Arizona is a state Trump believed he had firmly recaptured in 2024, after losing it to Joe Biden in 2020. His 5-point victory there in the 2024 presidential race suggested MAGA had consolidated a lead. But 2026 polling tells a different story. **Trump's approval rating in Arizona is now a net -17,** with a particularly marked collapse among independents (-39 net points), moderates, women, and young voters. These are precisely the electoral segments that decide races in a state as competitive as Arizona.

### The data that explain the defeat

Noble Predictive Insights' Arizona numbers from May 2026 are telling: only **27% of independents approve of Trump** in the state, versus 66% who disapprove. Among moderates, 24% approve, 71% disapprove. Among women, 37% approve, 60% disapprove. These statistics create a brutal electoral arithmetic: in a state where independents represent a significant share of the electorate, a candidate firmly tied to the Trump 2026 brand starts with a considerable structural handicap.

The collapse in Trump's approval among Arizona independents reflects, in particular, economic disappointment. His promises to lower prices, control inflation, and make America rich again — all of these run into an economic reality that, for many Arizonans, remains difficult. Trump's economic approval in the state stands at **-27 net** — a catastrophic figure that translates directly at the ballot box when candidates perceived as too Trumpy find themselves exposed.

*A 19-point loss is not a slap. It is a knockout. When a MAGA-branded candidate loses by that margin in Arizona — a state Trump had won — that deserves to be taken very seriously. It means the Trump brand is deteriorating in crucial electoral segments, and the 2026 primaries could be the opening act of a deeper political realignment.*

## The "YOLO Caucus" Phenomenon: Senators Who Are No Longer Afraid

### Tillis, Cornyn, Cassidy: the revolt of the outgoing

While primary results are being scrutinized at the state level, a distinct but related dynamic is developing in the United States Senate. An informal group of Republican senators — dubbed by American media the **"YOLO Caucus"** ("You Only Live Once") — is beginning to openly defy Trump, precisely because they no longer need to submit to Trump's electoral judgment. Senators **Thom Tillis** of North Carolina, **John Cornyn** of Texas, and **Bill Cassidy** of Louisiana — all outgoing or at the end of their political run — have voted against presidential positions or refused to bend to White House pressure on significant matters.

These "YOLO senators" represent something important: the re-emergence of a form of Republican independence that had seemed to disappear under Trump's total dominance of the party. They are no longer afraid of adverse endorsement threats or Trumpist primary campaigns — either because they are not seeking re-election, or because they have calculated that the Trump brand is sufficiently weakened to survive their opposition. That calculation itself is a major political signal.

### Trump versus his own Senate

The tension between Trump and the Republican Senate goes beyond the YOLO senators. The president has actively sabotaged even Republican nominations — the Clayton and Pulte nominations, blocked or delayed by rebel senators — and frustrations within the Republican Senate caucus are well documented. Trump wants a Senate that marches in lockstep. Several senators are reminding him that they have their own constituencies, their own priorities, and their own electorates to answer to.

This internal tension within the Republican Party is structural and deep. Trump transformed the GOP into the MAGA party. But MAGA is not a complete governance system — it is a protest and identity movement that works well for mobilizing a base but less well for managing the complex legislative coalitions that a divided Senate demands. The "Republican civil war" playing out in Washington between the executive and its congressional allies is one of the factors explaining surprising primary results: when the national party is in disarray, local results become unpredictable.

*The "YOLO Caucus" amuses and concerns me in equal measure. It amuses me because it proves that even in Trump's Republican Party, there remain individuals who prefer their own judgment to conformity. It concerns me because this rebellion remains fragmented, without a coherent political alternative, without an emerging leader capable of redefining American conservatism for the post-Trump era.*

## The Map of Trump's 2026 Endorsements: A Mixed Record

### The wins that confirm

It would be inaccurate to conclude from these results that the Trump endorsement machine is broken. It still works — selectively, in certain configurations. In **Texas**, Attorney General **Ken Paxton**, backed by Trump, defeated Senator **John Cornyn** in a recent primary runoff — a significant victory for the hard MAGA line over the Texas Republican establishment. In **Indiana**, several state senators were unseated by Trump-aligned challengers. In **Kentucky**, Representative **Thomas Massie** — a libertarian Republican frequently at odds with Trump — was beaten in his primary by a more loyal opponent.

These victories show that in deeply Republican states, with a very homogeneous and conservative primary electorate, the Trump endorsement remains decisive. The MAGA machinery works where the base is pure, the district deep red, and independents absent or scarce. That is not negligible — it still covers the majority of national Republican primaries. But it is increasingly untrue in competitive states, where general elections are won precisely with the voters that MAGA repels.

### The losses that raise questions

But Arizona at -19, Georgia's trends less comfortable than hoped, **Iowa** where Trump-endorsed Representative **Randy Feenstra** was defeated in his primary by a MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) rather than MAGA candidate — these signals constitute a troubling pattern for the Trump apparatus. They indicate that in certain segments of the Republican electorate, the Trump brand is becoming a liability rather than an asset.

The context of these defeats is not incidental: the controversy over the Iran deal is dividing the Republican camp, the economy worries the middle class despite the promises, scandals like the award of public contracts to Republican donors (the Reflecting Pool cleaning contract revealed by the New York Times) reinforce an image of a corrupt administration, and the standard MAGA message — immigration, electoral fraud, anti-elites — is beginning to meet fatigue in some segments of the conservative electorate.

*What strikes me in the Paxton wins and the Arizona losses is the geography. Deep-red Texas MAGA: Trump wins. Arizona swing state: Trump loses. This correlation between a state's competitiveness and MAGA primary performance is a structural trend, not an accident. And it bodes poorly for the November generals.*

## Jon Ossoff and Georgia: The Democratic Stakes in the Fall

### The most vulnerable Democratic senator

The Georgia Republican primary — Collins versus Dooley — takes on its full significance when placed in broader context: **Jon Ossoff** is the only Democratic senator facing voters in 2026 in a state Trump won in 2024. His vulnerability is structural. Georgia Republicans know it and have good reason to believe a strong candidate can beat him.

Republicans **have not won a Senate election in Georgia since 2016.** Both Senators Ossoff and Warnock were elected under exceptional circumstances in 2021 and have been confirmed since. But Georgia in 2026, with Trump leading the federal government and a mobilized Republican base, offers a real opportunity. The question is which Republican candidate maximizes that opportunity: Collins, the pure MAGA candidate who galvanizes the base but frightens independents? Or Dooley, the Kemp-backed outsider who could attract more moderates but lacks partisan coherence?

### The Collins argument: mobilize the base to win

Collins' theory of victory rests on maximum mobilization of the Republican base, using themes like the **Laken Riley Act** — illegal immigration and crime — to motivate conservative voters. Collins believes that in a Senate race, it is the base that decides, not moderates, and that Ossoff is vulnerable on immigration. Ossoff himself ultimately supported the Laken Riley Act after initially voting against it — a flip-flop that weakens him with his own Democratic base.

This strategy is coherent on paper. But it assumes the Arizona 2026 signal is not a national one. If the MAGA brand deteriorates sufficiently in states like Georgia — which flipped Democratic in 2020 and whose demographics are rapidly diversifying — then Collins' bet on pure base mobilization could be a losing bet in November, even if he wins the primary.

*Ossoff is harder to beat than he appears. He is intellectually solid, he raises phenomenal sums, and he has survived hostile conditions since 2017. Collins must prove he can appeal beyond Georgia's MAGA base. The Laken Riley Act alone will not be enough in a state as diverse as metropolitan Atlanta Georgia.*

## The Structural Factors Behind MAGA's Erosion in 2026

### The economy: the barometer that doesn't lie

The Arizona Public Opinion Pulse survey from May 2026 is explicit: Trump's **net economic approval in Arizona is -27.** That number is brutal. It means that in a state that was supposed to be a model of Trumpian success — economic returns, employment, cheap energy — the majority of residents believe the economy is heading in the wrong direction under Trump. Inflation, energy costs (despite the recent drop linked to the Iran deal), mortgage interest rates, housing prices — these daily realities erode the administration's political capital more surely than any scandal.

Trump had built much of his image on his supposed economic competence. In 2024, the electorate trusted him on the economy more than Biden. By 2026, that advantage appears to have evaporated in several states. Republicans who choose to stay fully on the MAGA line in their primaries will then have to defend a difficult economic record in November, before a broader and more demanding electorate than the primary base.

### Scandals and their accumulation

The Trump administration is accumulating controversies that, taken individually, may seem minor, but whose accumulation creates an image of favoritism and opacity. The story of the **Reflecting Pool** cleaning contract awarded without competitive bidding to a Republican donor, revealed by the New York Times — legally defensible but ethically dubious — illustrates this pattern. These stories feed the Democratic narrative of an administration serving the wealthy and powerful rather than "the ordinary American."

There is also the MAGA fracture over the Iran deal. Republicans from the hardest fringe — who wanted the total destruction of Iran's nuclear program and refused any negotiated agreement — feel betrayed by Trump. This disappointment in MAGA's most ideologically pure base creates abstentions and protest votes in some primaries. It is one of the variables that can explain surprising results like the Arizona -19 defeat.

*Republicans who lose in Arizona are not losing because voters have suddenly become Democrats. They are losing because Republicans and conservative independents stayed home — dissatisfied with the administration but not ready to vote Democratic. Abstention is the silent vote that kills majorities.*

## The Potential Realignment of the Republican Party

### Who comes after Trump in the GOP?

The question of Trump's succession within the Republican Party is beginning to take on a more concrete shape. **JD Vance**, vice president and architect of the Iran deal, is clearly positioning himself for a 2028 presidential run. His defense of the Iran deal — controversial in the hard base — positions him as a pragmatic rather than ideological MAGA figure. Other names are circulating: Ron DeSantis, who failed against Trump in 2024 but whose Florida continues to offer him a national platform. Glenn Youngkin in Virginia. And potentially Nikki Haley, who ran on a more traditionally conservative line in 2024.

What is remarkable is that all these potential successors must navigate the same dilemma: be close enough to Trump not to alienate the MAGA base that dominates Republican primaries, but distinct enough to attract independents without whom no general election can be won. That is a precarious balance, all the more so since Trump himself has shown no tolerance for any perception of disloyalty.

### The post-MAGA generation: a still-blurry vision

What the Republican Party still lacks for a successful post-Trump transition is a coherent alternative vision. MAGA is above all a protest identity — anti-elite, anti-establishment, anti-immigration, pro-Trump. It is not a governance doctrine. The 2026 electoral results could accelerate thinking on what a competitive American conservatism might look like in 2028 and beyond: more pragmatic, less personalized around one individual, capable of speaking to a more diverse America without abandoning the economic and cultural values that animate the Republican base.

That realignment, if it happens, will be long and painful. Trump is not the kind to relinquish the reins. But the June 2026 primaries — Arizona at -19, Georgia under strain, the YOLO Caucus in the Senate, MAHA beating MAGA in some states — may be the opening lines of a story that will be written over the next decade of American politics.

*I am not American, and I watch these internal Republican transformations with a mix of fascination and unease. Fascination because great democracies periodically reinvent themselves — and that is their strength. Unease because the 2026–2028 window is also the moment when crucial geopolitical decisions — Ukraine, China, Iran — will need a stable and coherent America. A Republican Party in internal civil war is not good news for Western stability.*

## Lessons for Democrats: No Reason to Celebrate Too Soon

### The Democratic establishment finds its footing

Democrats posted strong results in the June 3, 2026 primaries, winning or building commanding leads in states like New Jersey, Iowa, and California, while MAGA candidates suffered their first major defeats. Democratic press celebrated these results as a sign of a "Democratic awakening" and growing rejection of Trump.

But this optimistic reading needs tempering. Democratic primaries were mainly playing out in solidly Democratic districts or states — where establishment candidates were defending their natural turf. The results say little about the Democrats' ability to win in swing states in November. Ossoff in Georgia remains vulnerable even if Collins turns out to be a poor general-election candidate. And the Democratic movement itself is riven with tensions between its progressive wing and its center, between those who want to go further on economic issues and those who want to moderate the message to recapture lost white working-class voters.

### The risk of victorious arrogance

Democrats have a historical tendency to over-interpret partial victories as mandates for ambitious progressive agendas. In 2020, Biden's victory was interpreted by some as a mandate for radical transformation — a reading that ran into the reality of a 50-50 Senate and a House with a one-seat majority. Current signals suggest Americans are rejecting Trump rather than embracing a left-wing agenda. A Democratic Party that conflates the two risks squandering the structural advantage that MAGA's depreciation is handing it.

The real lesson of the June 2026 primaries is not that Democrats won. It is that American politics is in transition, traditional coalitions are reconstituting, and 2026 will be one of the most unpredictable years in recent American political history. In that relative chaos, the question is not which party is better — it is which one makes fewer mistakes.

*I said it for Republicans, I'll say it for Democrats: winning primaries does not predict winning in November. And celebrating too early is the most common strategic error in American electoral history. Americans have not changed profoundly — they are tired. Fatigue is not an ideology.*

## Arizona in the National Context: A Barometer of Coming Trends

### Why Arizona matters more than other states

Arizona is not merely a state with interesting results. It is a **first-order political barometer** for American national politics. Formerly a Republican stronghold, it has become the archetypal swing state — won by Biden in 2020, recaptured by Trump in 2024, now in motion again. Its demographics — a growing Hispanic community, an influx of newcomers from California and other coastal states, an aging white rural population traditionally Republican — make it a microcosm of America's transformations.

The MAGA defeat at -19 in a state Trump considered safely in his column sends a signal that strategists from both parties cannot ignore. If Arizona's trends replicate in other swing states — Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada — the November 2026 midterms could become a national referendum on the first half of Trump's second administration, with potentially devastating consequences for Republican majorities in the House and Senate.

### The accelerating electoral calendar

With mid-June runoffs, July primaries, and November generals, the 2026 electoral calendar is moving fast. Georgia and Arizona primaries are not ends in themselves — they are milestones in a long-distance race. Collins, if he wins the Georgia runoff, will have a few months to broaden his electorate beyond the MAGA base and convince Georgia independents he can represent them in the Senate. That is a difficult task for a candidate whose entire political identity is built on perfect alignment with a presidential figure struggling in the polls.

Arizona, for its part, enters a period of contests that will culminate in a gubernatorial race expected in July 2026 — where Republican **Andy Biggs**, backed by Trump, faces incumbent Democratic Governor **Katie Hobbs** with a considerable polling deficit. Polymarket was giving Biggs 51.5% in the Republican primary. But the general against Hobbs looks far more difficult in a state where Trump sits at -17.

*I think Arizona 2026 will be studied in political science books for years. It is the state that most clearly illustrates the contradiction at the heart of the MAGA strategy: maximize base turnout to win primaries, but alienate the independents needed to win generals. That is a circle no one has yet managed to square.*

## Impact on Foreign Policy and the Western Order

### A divided Congress, a more unstable foreign policy

Primary results are not purely domestic American events. They have direct implications for foreign policy and, by extension, for the security of the Western order. A divided Congress — or worse, a Senate or House that flips Democratic after November 2026 — would make implementing Trump's foreign policy even more difficult. The Iran deal, already contested within his own ranks, would need congressional ratification or implicit validation for the lifting of certain sanctions. If Congress resists, the deal could unravel.

Aid to Ukraine is another issue directly tied to electoral outcomes. A more Republican but more MAGA Congress could further reduce American support for Kyiv. A Congress partially flipping Democratic could conversely relaunched that support — at the cost of additional presidential confrontations. Europe, which so desperately needs American constancy in its support for Ukraine, is watching the 2026 midterms with entirely understandable anxiety.

### What the world must understand about American primaries

For America's allies and partners around the world, American primaries are not an internal affair without consequences. They are signals about the direction American foreign policy will take in the years ahead. A weakening of MAGA in the primaries could foreshadow a relative moderation of Trump's policy in his second half — less transactional, more multilateral. Or conversely, a resurgence of MAGA hawks frustrated by the Iran deal could push Trump toward more extreme positions to reassure his base.

The West needs America to remain a pillar of collective security, a supporter of Ukraine, a counterweight to China and Iran. MAGA defeats in Arizona and tensions in Georgia do not guarantee that — but they show that Americans, in a significant portion of the country, remain skeptical about the direction their country is taking. That is a signal of hope for those who believe in a united West.

*I watch the American primaries of 2026 and I see an American people that does not yet know exactly what it wants — but is beginning to know what it no longer wants. That is often how great political changes begin: through an accumulation of rejections before alternatives take clear shape. 2026 may be the year of rejection. 2028 may be the year of choice.*

## The Mechanics of Runoffs: When the Electoral System Creates Its Own Dynamics

### The Georgia runoff: a double-edged weapon

Georgia's **runoff system** — which requires a candidate to obtain more than 50% of the vote to be declared the winner in the first round, failing which a second round is held between the top two — created the Collins-Dooley situation. Collins had finished first in the May 19 primary with a lead over Dooley, but neither had surpassed 40%. That meant a large pool of unallocated Republican votes — voters who had supported other first-round candidates whose orientation in the runoff was uncertain.

In these conditions, Trump's last-minute endorsement on the Sunday before the Tuesday runoff was an attempt to convert those floating votes in Collins' favor. The question was whether that late endorsement — coming after Trump waited for the first-round outcome before committing — would carry the same impact as an early, enthusiastic one. In a primary where momentum and dynamics count as much as positions, the timing of the endorsement is itself a signal of Trump's confidence — or uncertainty — in his own candidate.

### The Kemp effect: an establishment that resists

Governor Kemp's support for Dooley is an undervalued factor in analyzing this race. Kemp has a real political organization in Georgia, considerable fundraising capacity, and institutional credibility with Republicans who do not fully identify with MAGA. His choice to back Dooley — a candidate without political experience but with an image of being a Trump collaborator without being his dependent — was an attempt to create a third path between Collins' pure MAGA and Democrat Ossoff.

This strategy is consistent with Kemp's 2022 logic: resist MAGA pressure, build his own broad Republican coalition, and win. Kemp had handily won his gubernatorial primary against the Trump opponent despite presidential attacks. His ability to replicate that performance through Dooley remains to be proven — but Georgia's recent Republican history suggests the Kemp establishment remains a real, distinct force, and sometimes more effective than the pure MAGA apparatus.

*Kemp is one of the most interesting Republicans on the current American political scene. He survived Trump's wrath. He proved that you can be a Republican without being a servile MAGA follower. And his political survival gives hope that the Republican Party still contains elements capable of building something beyond the Trump personality cult.*

## The Post-Trump Generation: Candidates Who Refuse the MAGA Mold

### A new Republican guard emerges in key states

Beneath the visible fractures of the 2026 primaries, something deeper is taking shape: a **new generation of Republican candidates** who refuse to fit the MAGA mold while also refusing a return to Bush-Romney positions. These candidates — found in **Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Colorado** — adopt hybrid positions: **hawks on immigration, pragmatists on the economy,** and frankly skeptical of Trump's diplomatic adventures with Tehran or Moscow. They never call themselves Never-Trumpers. They prefer the term "results Republicans."

This phenomenon is still embryonic, but it carries the seeds of a **profound realignment.** The mistake would be to confuse it with the institutional resistance of Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, who paid for their constitutional loyalty with their political careers. The new post-MAGA Republican guard is not fighting on the terrain of **2021 values** — it is fighting on the terrain of **2026 results.** That is terrain where Trump can lose, and he knows it. His campaign teams have begun closely monitoring primary cycles in **ten pivot states** ahead of 2028.

### The electoral arithmetic shifting under MAGA's feet

In Arizona, numbers published by Noble Predictive Insights in May 2026 are devastating for the MAGA dynamic: among independent voters — the group that decides every general election — **only 27% approve of Trump's performance.** His economic approval rating in this crucial state stands at **-27 net points.** These numbers are not anomalies — they reflect a national trend in which Trump's expanded coalition is shrinking as the **real effects of trade policies,** cuts to social programs, and persistent inflation make themselves felt in households.

The mechanics of runoffs amplify these tensions. In a second round, only the most motivated voters show up — and in 2026, the most motivated voters in several key states are **not MAGA enthusiasts, but determined opponents.** The Trump strategy of early endorsements for the most loyal candidates may work in broad primaries where the MAGA base is large enough. In low-turnout runoffs with a hostile independent electorate, it is an increasingly risky bet. **The arithmetic does not lie.**

*I'll admit I watched the MAGA empire with a certain disbelief since 2016 — like a political force that seemed to defy the laws of electoral gravity. Arizona 2026 reminds me that those laws always apply, sooner or later. Enthusiasm compensates for one cycle. Economic results, on the other hand, are measured at the checkout and in the fridge. And there, no narrative holds.*

## Conclusion: The Machine Stalls, But Doesn't Stop

### What these primaries are really telling us

The June 2026 primaries — Arizona at -19, Georgia under strain, the YOLO Caucus in the Senate — do not signal the collapse of Trump or the end of MAGA. They signal something more precise and ultimately more important: **the end of infallibility.** Trump remains powerful in primaries. But he is no longer invincible. His endorsement remains useful but is no longer automatically decisive. His base is solid but fraying in the electoral segments on which victories in competitive states depend.

### Fall 2026: the real test

The real decisions will be made in November 2026. If MAGA Republicans win their primaries in Arizona, Georgia, and elsewhere but lose the generals, the message will be unambiguous: primary-election America and general-election America are two different electorates, and MAGA optimizes for the first at the expense of the second. That scenario could accelerate the Republican realignment discussed earlier. Or conversely, Trump could succeed in mobilizing sufficiently to buck the trend — he did it in 2016, in 2020 (even while losing), and in 2024. The history of American politics in recent years is also a history of forecasters' errors. Caution is warranted. And close attention, too.

### Primary Sources

[Washington Post — Trump endorses Collins in Georgia Senate runoff — June 14, 2026](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/06/14/trump-georgia-senate-endorsement-collins-dooley/d217c504-67ec-11f1-830e-133d20cadd28_story.html)

[Newsweek — MAGA outsiders will test Trump's endorsement power in key GOP runoffs — June 2026](https://www.newsweek.com/videos/maga-outsiders-will-test-trumps-endorsement-power-in-key-gop-runoffs)

[Noble Predictive Insights — Trump Approval Hits All-Time Low in Arizona — May 21, 2026](https://www.noblepredictiveinsights.com/post/trump-approval-hits-all-time-low-in-az-as-democrats-narrowly-lead-generic-ballot)

### Secondary Sources

[Politico — Establishment Dems surge, MAGA quakes — June 3, 2026](https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2026/06/03/establishment-dems-surge-maga-quakes-00948068)

[NPR — Republicans' YOLO Caucus: senators with nothing left to fear — June 18, 2026](https://www.npr.org/2026/06/18/nx-s1-5850389/republicans-yolo-caucus-bill-cassidy-john-cornyn-thom-tillis)

[Bloomberg — Why MAGA Republicans Keep Winning When Trump Is Losing — May 27, 2026](https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2026-05-27/paxton-cornyn-primary-why-maga-republicans-win-as-trump-s-approval-sinks)

[Ballotpedia — Arizona gubernatorial election, 2026](https://ballotpedia.org/Arizona_gubernatorial_election,_2026)

[Polymarket — Arizona Governor Republican Primary Winner — June 2026](https://polymarket.com/event/arizona-governor-republican-primary-winner)

**By Maxime Marquette, columnist**

## Columnist's transparency note

### Editorial stance

I am not a journalist but a **columnist and analyst**. My expertise lies in observing and analysing the geopolitical, economic and strategic dynamics that shape our world. My work is to take political strategies apart, to understand global economic movements, to put the decisions of international actors in context and to offer analytical perspectives on the changes that are redefining our societies.

I do not claim the cold objectivity of traditional journalism, which stops at reporting facts. **I claim analytical clarity**, rigorous interpretation and a deep understanding of the complex issues that concern us all. My role is to give meaning to the facts, to place them in their historical and strategic context, and to offer a critical reading of events.

### Method and sources

This text keeps the basic distinction between **verified facts and interpretive analysis**. The rule never changes: a factual claim is published only when a verifiable source supports it, and the sources this article actually used are listed under **Sources**, never here.

**Primary source families** used by the publication, when the story has them: official statements from governments and international institutions, public statements by political leaders, reports from intergovernmental organisations, dispatches from recognised international news agencies.

**Secondary source families**: specialised publications, internationally recognised news media, analyses from established research institutions, reports from industry organisations.

When an article cites statistical, economic or geopolitical data, it comes from the institutions that produce it (intergovernmental organisations, central banks, national statistics offices), and the exact institution is named under **Sources**.

### Nature of the analysis

The analyses, interpretations and perspectives in the analytical sections of this article are a **critical, contextual synthesis** based on the information available, the trends observed and the expert comments cited in the sources consulted.

My role is to interpret these facts, to set them in the context of today's geopolitical and economic dynamics, and to give them a coherent meaning within the larger story of the changes shaping our time. These analyses reflect expertise built through continuous observation of international affairs and an understanding of the strategic mechanisms that drive global actors.

This article describes a documented state of affairs on its publication date, not a prediction: later developments may shift its outlook. No update is promised in advance; when an article is corrected or completed, the change is dated in the text.

---

Source: Maxime Marquette, MadMax. When citing, name the author and link https://mad-max.co/en/article/analyse-georgie-arizona-la-machine-dendossement-de-trump-grippe-dans-les-primaires-repub