# In Ankara, NATO Pledges €70 Billion to Ukraine > Introduction: a summit under heavy diplomatic tension - Author: Maxime Marquette - Publisher: MadMax (https://mad-max.co) - Section: Reportage - Published: 2026-07-04 - Canonical URL: https://mad-max.co/en/article/a-ankara-lotan-promet-70-milliards-deuros-a-lukraine ## Introduction: a summit under heavy diplomatic tension ### A text already approved before the official opening Days ahead of the **NATO summit in Ankara**, scheduled for **July 7 and 8, 2026**, the **ambassadors of all thirty-two member countries** had already approved the text of the final declaration, a move confirming the scale of the commitment expected toward **Ukraine** and the Atlantic Alliance's **collective defense**. According to **Reuters**, the text, seen by the agency before its official release, commits leaders to affirm an **"ironclad commitment"** to **Article 5** of the North Atlantic Treaty. This clause, which states that an attack on one ally is an attack on all, remains the cornerstone of **Western deterrence** against **Russia**. Its public reaffirmation, amid a **tense climate** in which several voices worry about a **gradual American disengagement** from Europe, sends a **strong signal** that **Kyiv** and **European capitals** had been eagerly awaiting. ### President Trump expected at the heart of the proceedings U.S. President **Donald Trump** is set to attend this summit, and his presence lends particular weight to the declaration, since several European allies had feared for months a **gradual pullback** of America's commitment to **collective European security**. According to **Euronews**, Washington's apparent confirmation regarding the collective defense of the whole Alliance carries special significance. **NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte** had already laid the groundwork at a ministerial meeting in Sweden in May, stating bluntly that the **commitment to Article 5** remains **"ironclad"** and that the Alliance's response to any attack would be **"devastating."** *Let's be clear about this: in a world where Vladimir Putin continually tests the limits of Western patience, this public reaffirmation of Article 5 is not a routine diplomatic exercise — it's a red line drawn in indelible ink.* ## The €70 billion pledged to Ukraine ### A figure crystallizing weeks of negotiation According to the declaration seen by **Reuters**, NATO members are committing to provide **€70 billion**, or roughly **$80 billion U.S.**, in military assistance to **Ukraine** for the year **2026**, with a pledge to maintain **"at least equivalent levels"** in **2027**. This figure is the culmination of **weeks of tense negotiations** among European allies. German Chancellor **Friedrich Merz** had confirmed as early as **July 1** that NATO allies would need to commit at least **€70 billion** in military and financial support to Ukraine, according to remarks reported by the **EFE** news agency. That figure, however, is not entirely made up of new funds. ### A tally combining old and new pledges According to the **Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung**, this **€70 billion** figure combines **€30 billion** from the **European Union's** loan program for Ukraine, and **€40 billion** corresponding to the commitment made at the **2024 Washington summit**. If allies also confirm a comparable level for 2027, the combined total would reach roughly **€140 billion** over two years. A notable detail reported by several outlets, including **RBC-Ukraine**: the financing would reportedly be secured without direct **U.S.** participation, leaving the bulk of the financial burden to **European allies and Canada**, a development confirming the **gradual shift of the center of gravity** of military support toward Europe. *We can't celebrate this halfway: €70 billion is enormous, but the fact that Washington remains on the sidelines of direct financing confirms an underlying trend that should worry anyone who believes America must remain the central pillar of Western security.* ## Italy pumps the brakes on the long-term commitment ### A holdout that complicates consensus Despite the agreement in principle on **€70 billion** for 2026, **disagreements persist** over committing to a comparable level of support in **2027**. According to **RBC-Ukraine**, **Italy** specifically opposes a long-term commitment tied to a precise date, leaving that portion of the text bracketed in preliminary versions of the declaration. This Italian resistance illustrates a **recurring fault line** within the Alliance between countries wanting to guarantee predictable, lasting support for Ukraine, and those preferring to preserve budgetary flexibility amid domestic economic pressures. ### Ambassadors return to the negotiating table **NATO ambassadors** gathered in **Brussels** were expected to hold further rounds of talks before the summit's official opening, a dynamic showing just how closely every comma of this declaration is being **scrutinized** by the **thirty-two member capitals**. *As frustrating as this Italian hesitation may be, it illustrates an uncomfortable truth: Western unity against Russia is never guaranteed, it's negotiated word by word, budget line by budget line — and that fragility is exactly what Moscow hopes to exploit.* ## Russia labeled a long-term threat ### Language that leaves no ambiguity According to a copy of the document reviewed by **Euronews**, the summit's final declaration will describe **Russia** as a **"long-term threat to Euro-Atlantic security and stability,"** wording that confirms the **hardline stance** the Alliance has held since the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. This language is far from trivial in the current diplomatic context: it confirms that despite internal pressures and budget fatigue, NATO refuses to downplay the threat posed by **Vladimir Putin's** regime to the **security of the entire European continent**. ### Iran also targeted by the declaration The same document reportedly states, again according to **Euronews**, that **"Iran can never possess a nuclear weapon,"** broadening the Alliance's **spectrum of security concerns** beyond the European theater alone, toward the growing tensions in the **Middle East**. *This dual firmness toward Russia and Iran in the same text is no accident: it reflects a clear-eyed geopolitical read, that of an authoritarian axis stretching from Moscow to Tehran, and the West is right to name it plainly rather than look away.* ## The target of 5% of GDP in defense spending ### A commitment made in The Hague, now put to the test At last year's **summit in The Hague**, NATO members had pledged to raise defense spending to **5% of gross domestic product** by **2035**, an **ambitious target** split between **3.5%** for core defense needs and **1.5%** for broader resilience and security measures. Secretary-General **Mark Rutte** stressed, while preparing for the Ankara summit, the need to turn these financial commitments into **concrete military capabilities**, noting that the question is no longer whether allies must invest more, but how quickly they can convert that money into equipment and genuinely deployable forces. ### Defense industrial production at the heart of the talks Beyond the numbers, Ankara is also expected to mark progress on **defense industrial production**, a **crucial issue** for allowing Europe to produce, more quickly, the munitions, air-defense systems, and drones needed for its own security and Ukraine's. *Spending figures mean nothing without factories running at full tilt: that's the real credibility test of this decade, and Europe can no longer hide behind budget promises if production lines don't keep pace.* ## Turkey's pivotal role as host ### Ankara calls for a clear reaffirmation of solidarity Turkish Defense Minister **Yaşar Güler** said **Turkey** expects this summit to reaffirm solidarity and unity within the Alliance, along with a renewed commitment to **Article 5**, according to remarks reported by **Turkish authorities** themselves. Güler stated that the summit's main goal is to underscore the Alliance's unity and its determination to protect the **Euro-Atlantic area** against current threats and challenges, while building a **multidimensional security architecture** for NATO's future. ### A geographic choice loaded with symbolism The choice of **Ankara** as host city is not incidental: **Turkey** occupies a **uniquely strategic position** within the Alliance, at the crossroads of Europe, the **Middle East**, and the **Black Sea**, a region where tensions with Russia and the fallout from the Ukrainian conflict are directly felt. *Holding this summit in Ankara, rather than in a more comfortable Western European capital, sends a message: NATO must watch its eastern and southern flanks with the same seriousness it has traditionally reserved for the Atlantic.* ## Arms contracts announced on the summit's sidelines ### Tens of billions in new contracts expected According to **Times Network**, NATO members are expected to announce in Ankara **arms contracts worth tens of billions of dollars**, a concrete demonstration of the **acceleration of European rearmament** in the face of the persistent Russian threat. This wave of contracts continues efforts European countries have pursued for several years to rebuild **defense industrial capacity** long neglected after the end of the Cold War, an effort now deemed urgent given Russian aggression. ### A lingering dependence on the United States Despite this acceleration, several analysts point out that Europe remains heavily dependent on **American military equipment** for its most advanced capabilities, a reality that complicates recurring calls for greater **European strategic autonomy**. *You don't build credible strategic autonomy in a few months of contracts, however impressive the figures: Europe has to accept that this path will take an entire decade, not a single spectacular summit.* ## Persistent worries about an American pullback ### A troop reduction that fuels doubts According to a report by **Eurasia Review**, the **United States** is reportedly seeking to ease European concerns about a gradual withdrawal of American troops from the continent, in a context where the **Trump** administration has repeatedly expressed its wish to see Europe shoulder a bigger share of its own defense. This dual message, reassuring on the commitment to Article 5 yet worrying on physical military presence in Europe, illustrates the complexity of the current transatlantic relationship under this American administration. ### The Middle East conflict pulling attention elsewhere The summit must also contend with competing priorities, notably tensions linked to Iran's potential closure of the **Strait of Hormuz**, an issue absorbing a growing share of **American strategic attention**, potentially at the expense of the European file. *This is the great challenge of our era: convincing an American administration focused on the Middle East and the Indo-Pacific that Europe still deserves front-row attention, as Beijing and Tehran take up ever more space in Washington's strategic calculus.* ## The PURL mechanism and the purchase of American weapons ### More than six billion dollars already committed According to data published by **NATO** itself, allies have already committed more than **six billion U.S. dollars** in military equipment purchased from the United States through the **PURL** mechanism, with deliveries already underway to Ukraine as of June 2026. This mechanism illustrates a form of **pragmatic compromise**: rather than relying on direct American donations, European allies themselves finance the purchase of American equipment, a solution that satisfies both Washington's desire to cut its own direct spending and Ukraine's urgent need for advanced materiel. ### A reminder of the long-term pact signed in Washington NATO also recalls that at the **2024 Washington summit**, allies had committed to providing a minimum of **€40 billion** in funding in 2024, a commitment far exceeded since actual contributions reached more than **€50 billion** that year, nearly **60%** of which came from European allies and Canada. *This 2024 precedent deserves to be recalled every time doubt creeps in: when Europe promises, Europe generally delivers more than promised, and that track record should keep guiding measured skepticism toward the new announcements coming out of Ankara.* ## Kyiv's expected reaction ### Relief tinged with caution For the Ukrainian government, confirmation of this **€70 billion** package represents a **welcome relief** after months of uncertainty over the durability of Western support, in a context where every **delayed weapons delivery** translates directly into losses on the front line. Still, several Ukrainian officials have learned to stay cautious about summit announcements, knowing that turning financial pledges into actual deliveries of weapons and ammunition often takes months, if not years. ### The need for stronger transparency mechanisms The original German proposal behind this €70 billion package specifically included the creation of **new transparency mechanisms** regarding each country's contributions, a **direct response** to past criticism over the lack of precise tracking of individual allied commitments. *Transparency about who's paying for what is not a bureaucratic footnote: it's what will allow Western public opinion to keep supporting this indirect war effort for years to come, if needed.* ## What this summit reveals about Western cohesion ### Real unity despite internal tensions Despite disagreements over the exact duration of financial commitments, the Ankara summit confirms a fundamental reality: the **Atlantic Alliance** remains capable of producing **substantial consensus** against the Russian threat, even amid a difficult domestic political climate for several of its members. This ability to maintain a common front, despite **internal budget pressures** and national electoral calculations, is in itself a **powerful strategic message** aimed at the **Kremlin**, which has hoped since the war began to see Western unity crack. ### The true test of long-term durability The real test will not be decided in Ankara but in the **months and years that follow**: allies' ability to concretely honor their **2027** commitments will determine whether this declaration remains a **historic milestone** or merely a diplomatic communication exercise with no real follow-through. *History will judge Ankara not by the words spoken in the summit hall, but by the shells delivered, the aircraft sent, and the air-defense systems installed on Ukrainian soil in the twelve months that follow.* ## Critical voices and Russian skepticism ### Moscow denounces a Western escalation Unsurprisingly, media close to the **Kremlin** have dismissed this aid package as merely prolonging a conflict they want to see end on Russian terms, insisting that this money will do more to fuel Western defense industry than to genuinely help the Ukrainian population. This reading, widely echoed by Russian propaganda, deliberately ignores the fact that this military support is a direct response to aggression initiated by Russia itself in 2022, and that halting it would simply mean forcing Kyiv into **capitulation**. ### A minority of Western voices calling for budget restraint Within Western countries themselves, some voices continue to question the scale of these repeated financial commitments, citing internal budget pressures and the need to prioritize other public spending amid populations sometimes weary of a dragging conflict. *I understand budget fatigue, but history will never forgive the West for hesitating in the face of a dictator who, for his part, shows no sign of fatigue in his determination to redraw Europe's borders by force.* ## The future of the transatlantic relationship after Ankara ### A fragile balance between Washington and Europe This summit marks an important step in the **gradual redefinition** of the transatlantic relationship, in which **Europe** now shoulders a growing share of the financial and military burden, while the **United States** retains an **ultimate guarantor role** through Article 5, without directly financing the bulk of support for Ukraine. This evolution, if it holds over time, could reshape the **Western security architecture** for decades to come, with a more autonomous Europe still dependent on the American strategic umbrella in the event of a major direct confrontation. ### The need to turn promises into lasting action It remains to be seen whether the **32 member countries** can translate this declaration into concrete, lasting action, in a geopolitical context where **Russia's strategic patience** appears limitless and where every sign of Western division is immediately exploited by Kremlin propaganda. *Ankara needs to mark a turning point, not just a waypoint: if the pledged €70 billion doesn't quickly translate into concrete deliveries, this summit will be nothing more than a **footnote** in the history of this war.* ## Canada's position and non-European allies ### Ottawa confirms its contribution to the collective package **Canada**, a founding NATO member though geographically distant from the European theater, is also expected to contribute to the **€70 billion** package, confirming its status as a reliable partner alongside European allies in financing the Ukrainian war effort, even without direct American participation. This Canadian contribution, while proportionally more modest than that of the major European powers, illustrates the truly **transatlantic** scope of this collective effort, which extends well beyond the borders of the European continent to engage the whole of **Western democracies**. ### The United Kingdom maintains its role as a military leader The **United Kingdom**, which has played a **leading role** since the conflict began in supplying arms and training to Ukrainian troops, is expected to continue holding a **central position** in implementing the commitments made in Ankara, particularly in **coordinating deliveries** of military equipment. This British continuity, despite domestic political changes in recent years, shows that support for Ukraine transcends the usual **partisan divides** within major Western democracies. *The roles of Canada and the United Kingdom are a reminder of an essential truth: this war is not just a European matter, it's a test for the entire Western world, and every contribution, however modest, counts in this historic arm-wrestle against Russian authoritarianism.* ## Conclusion: Ankara, one milestone among others ### A strong but fragile signal The NATO summit in **Ankara** confirms, on paper, a renewed commitment to **Ukraine** and the Atlantic Alliance's **collective defense**, with a **€70 billion** financial package and a firm reaffirmation of **Article 5**. This outcome, achieved after weeks of tense negotiations, shows that **Western unity**, however imperfect and at times laborious, remains functional in the face of the Russian threat. The persistent disagreements, notably Italy's stance on 2027 commitments, are nonetheless a reminder that this unity remains fragile and will have to be renegotiated every year, amid a domestic political climate often hostile to massive new financial commitments. ### The real judgment will come later History will not remember the words spoken in Ankara, but rather the concrete ability of Western allies to deliver the weapons, ammunition, and defense systems promised, within the **announced timelines**, to a Ukraine that continues to pay the **blood price** for the security of the entire European continent. *If I had to take away just one lesson from Ankara, it's this: the West still knows how to stand together when the stakes demand it, and that may be the best news Vladimir Putin received this week, even if he'll never admit it publicly.* **By Maxime Marquette, columnist** ## Columnist's transparency note ### Editorial stance I am not a journalist but a **columnist and analyst**. My expertise lies in observing and analysing the geopolitical, economic and strategic dynamics that shape our world. My work is to take political strategies apart, to understand global economic movements, to put the decisions of international actors in context and to offer analytical perspectives on the changes that are redefining our societies. I do not claim the cold objectivity of traditional journalism, which stops at reporting facts. **I claim analytical clarity**, rigorous interpretation and a deep understanding of the complex issues that concern us all. My role is to give meaning to the facts, to place them in their historical and strategic context, and to offer a critical reading of events. ### Method and sources This text keeps the basic distinction between **verified facts and interpretive analysis**. The rule never changes: a factual claim is published only when a verifiable source supports it, and the sources this article actually used are listed under **Sources**, never here. **Primary source families** used by the publication, when the story has them: official statements from governments and international institutions, public statements by political leaders, reports from intergovernmental organisations, dispatches from recognised international news agencies. **Secondary source families**: specialised publications, internationally recognised news media, analyses from established research institutions, reports from industry organisations. When an article cites statistical, economic or geopolitical data, it comes from the institutions that produce it (intergovernmental organisations, central banks, national statistics offices), and the exact institution is named under **Sources**. ### Nature of the analysis The analyses, interpretations and perspectives in the analytical sections of this article are a **critical, contextual synthesis** based on the information available, the trends observed and the expert comments cited in the sources consulted. My role is to interpret these facts, to set them in the context of today's geopolitical and economic dynamics, and to give them a coherent meaning within the larger story of the changes shaping our time. These analyses reflect expertise built through continuous observation of international affairs and an understanding of the strategic mechanisms that drive global actors. This article describes a documented state of affairs on its publication date, not a prediction: later developments may shift its outlook. No update is promised in advance; when an article is corrected or completed, the change is dated in the text. ## Sources ### Primary sources - [Reuters — NATO leaders to affirm 'ironclad commitment' to collective defence in Ankara — July 3, 2026](https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/nato-leaders-affirm-ironclad-commitment-collective-defence-ankara-summit-text-2026-07-03/) - [Euronews — NATO to reaffirm iron-clad commitment to Article 5 at Ankara summit — July 3, 2026](https://www.euronews.com/2026/07/03/nato-to-reaffirm-iron-clad-commitment-to-article-5-at-ankara-summit) - [NATO — NATO's response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine — June 2026](https://www.nato.int/en/what-we-do/partnerships-and-cooperation/natos-support-for-ukraine) ### Secondary sources - [EFE — Merz says NATO allies to commit €70 billion in support for Ukraine — July 1, 2026](https://efe.com/english/latest-news/2026-07-01/merz-says-nato-allies-to-commit-e70-billion-in-support-for-ukraine/) - [RBC-Ukraine — NATO divided over €70 billion military aid package for Ukraine — June 30, 2026](https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/nato-divided-over-70-billion-military-aid-1782852983.html) - [Times Now News — NATO Summit 2026: Trump, Russia, Ukraine and Europe's Defence Spending Problem Explained — July 3, 2026](https://www.timesnownews.com/world/middle-east/nato-summit-2026-trump-russia-ukraine-and-europes-defence-spending-problem-explained-article-154900840) - [Turkish Directorate of Communications — Turkish Defence Minister says Türkiye expects reaffirmation of Article 5 commitments](https://www.iletisim.gov.tr/ENGLISH/dis_basinda_turkiye/detay/turkish-defence-minister-says-turkiye-expects-reaffirmation-of-article-5-commitments-at-ankara-nato-summit-bta) --- Source: Maxime Marquette, MadMax. When citing, name the author and link https://mad-max.co/en/article/a-ankara-lotan-promet-70-milliards-deuros-a-lukraine